On Monday 23 Aug 2010 7:57:28 pm Clinton Stimpson wrote:
On 08/22/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/22 Eric Noularderic.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpsonclin...@elemtech.com:
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained
sub projects, and the
2010/8/23 Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com:
On 08/22/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/22 Eric Noularderic.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpsonclin...@elemtech.com:
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained
sub projects, and the sub
2010/8/22 Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de:
Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
means you want to get a single package whose content
is the
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com:
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained sub
projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for the component
names.
I do not usually work with sub-project and I must admit I don't even know
how CPack
2010/8/22 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/22 Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de:
Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
means you want to get a
2010/8/22 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/21 Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com:
I wondered if one would typically use groups if their project contained sub
projects, and the sub projects had different conventions for the component
names.
I do not usually work with
On Sunday 22 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
...
CPack is not aware **AT ALL** of subprojects :-(
It's even worse, since CPack is not meant to be included more than once
in the same tree.
In fact you already know that because you are the reporter of this:
Hi All,
I finally rebased my previous work on component support for Archive Generators
(i.e. STGZ TBZ2 TGZ TZZIP)
(see also ML discussions:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-July/038575.html
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-August/038663.html
2010/8/21 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
[...]
They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
means you want to get a single package whose content
is the merge of all components GROUPS
3.b)
On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/21 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
[...]
They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
means you want to get a single package whose content
Am Saturday 21 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
They change the number and the contents of the generated packages:
3.a) CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_GROUPS_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1
means you want to get a single package whose content
is the merge of all components GROUPS
3.b)
Hi Eric,
I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
you think there will be any workaround or small hack to make this work
with current CPackRPM?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Chris Wolf
2010/8/11 Thawan Kooburat ktha...@gmail.com:
Hi Eric,
I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
you think there will be any workaround or small hack to make this work
with current CPackRPM?
On 8/11/10 5:39 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/11 Thawan Kooburat ktha...@gmail.com:
Hi Eric,
I read though this thread and also two bug reports related to this issue.
It seems like it will take a while because of CPack design issue. Do
you think there will be any workaround or small hack
On 8/9/10 2:22 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/9 Chris Wolf cw10...@gmail.com:
On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/4 Kishore kitts.mailingli...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a
On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/4 Kishore kitts.mailingli...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people
On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/4 Kishore kitts.mailingli...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
2010/8/9 Chris Wolf cw10...@gmail.com:
On 8/9/10 12:11 PM, Kishore wrote:
On Friday 06 Aug 2010 4:18:36 am Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/4 Kishore kitts.mailingli...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
2010/8/6 Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com:
On Thursday, August 05, 2010 04:46:01 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/3 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/3 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
2. may always
On Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/6 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
...
I think I missed the fact that you did not used component GROUPS
at all in the first place :-)
Sorry I didn't follow closely...
What is
2010/8/6 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/6 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Noulard wrote:
...
I think I missed the fact that you did not used component GROUPS
at all in the first place :-)
2010/8/3 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/3 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2. may always be an option because it was the behavior we had before the
component support and ALL CPack generator may handle
On Thursday, August 05, 2010 04:46:01 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/3 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/3 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
2. may always be an option because it was the behavior we had
2010/8/4 Kishore kitts.mailingli...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the
2010/8/3 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/3 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2. may always be an option because it was the behavior we had before the
component support and ALL CPack generator may handle
2010/8/2 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate multiple
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 4:59:47 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate
On Aug 2, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate
Hi All,
I did add a patch for the multiple file problem
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10736
May be interested people can have a try and comment
this patch.
It adds the possibility for any CPack generators to generate multiple file.
It adds preliminary support for component to all
Hi All,
I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
Kishore said:
I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
David answered:
Could you elaborate on full support for multiple components in cpack either
in another thread,
or in a feature request bug in
On 7/30/10 6:35 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
Kishore said:
I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
David answered:
Could you elaborate on full support for multiple components in cpack either
in
On Friday 30 Jul 2010 5:05:56 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
Hi All,
I'll try to launch a specific thread for this following what
Kishore said:
I would like to see full support for multiple components in cpack.
David answered:
Could you elaborate on full support for multiple components in
32 matches
Mail list logo
