Re: [CMake] Version 2.8 affects exception handling?

2009-11-30 Thread Brad King
Bill Hoffman wrote: Bill Spotz wrote: when the epetra dynamic library gets linked under the new cmake and not the old. This could be problematic because it is using the compiler /usr/bin/c++, which on my system is version 4.0.1 (although the gfortran compiler is version 4.4.1). So I have

Re: [CMake] Version 2.8 affects exception handling?

2009-11-28 Thread Bill Hoffman
Bill Spotz wrote: I finally got around to doing this, and the only difference in the compile flags is that the new version of cmake uses the compiler flag -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 where the old one does not. My MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable is set to 10.5 either way,

Re: [CMake] Version 2.8 affects exception handling?

2009-11-28 Thread Bill Spotz
On Nov 28, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Bill Spotz wrote: I finally got around to doing this, and the only difference in the compile flags is that the new version of cmake uses the compiler flag -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 where the old one does not. My MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET

[CMake] Version 2.8 affects exception handling?

2009-10-21 Thread Bill Spotz
Hi, I am a Trilinos developer, so I recently upgraded to CMake version 2.8 so that I could test the Trilinos release 10 tarball. I am seeing certain unit tests fail that were working before (in the Trilinos release 10 repository) and this is the current state of my debugging process:

Re: [CMake] Version 2.8 affects exception handling?

2009-10-21 Thread Bill Hoffman
Bill Spotz wrote: Hi, I am a Trilinos developer, so I recently upgraded to CMake version 2.8 so that I could test the Trilinos release 10 tarball. I am seeing certain unit tests fail that were working before (in the Trilinos release 10 repository) and this is the current state of my