Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Brad King wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> Alexander Neundorf wrote: Attached is a first try of a patch against 2.4 branch. It introduces two new variables CMAKE_CREATE_PREPROCESS_RULES and >>> CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES. I think especially

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> Attached is a first try of a patch against 2.4 branch. >>> It introduces two new variables CMAKE_CREATE_PREPROCESS_RULES and >> CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES. I think especially the name >> CMAKE_CREATE

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Attached is a first try of a patch against 2.4 branch. > > It introduces two new variables CMAKE_CREATE_PREPROCESS_RULES and > CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES. I think especially the name > CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES is not good (sin

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Attached is a first try of a patch against 2.4 branch. > It introduces two new variables CMAKE_CREATE_PREPROCESS_RULES and > CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES. I think especially the name > CMAKE_CREATE_ASSEMBLE_RULES is not good (since actually everything except > assembli

Re: Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Hi, Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Original-Nachricht > > Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file > >> also a target whi

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Original-Nachricht > Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file >> also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which >> preprocesses

Re: Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Original-Nachricht Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file > also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which > preprocesses and compiles, but not assembles

Re: Convenience libraries [was Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?]

Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Ellson wrote: Brad King wrote: John Ellson wrote: Not sure that I'm following the converstation properly here, but can any of this be used to provide access to a set of .o for use as a "convenience library" ? No, these v

Re: Re: Convenience libraries [was Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?]

Hi, Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Ellson wrote: > > Brad King wrote: > >> John Ellson wrote: > >>> > >>> Not sure that I'm following the converstation properly here, but > >>> can any of this be used to provide access to a set of .o for use as a > >>> "convenience library" ? > >> > >

Re: Convenience libraries [was Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?]

John Ellson wrote: Brad King wrote: John Ellson wrote: Not sure that I'm following the converstation properly here, but can any of this be used to provide access to a set of .o for use as a "convenience library" ? No, these variables are used to specify rules for the generators to put in t

Convenience libraries [was Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?]

Brad King wrote: John Ellson wrote: Not sure that I'm following the converstation properly here, but can any of this be used to provide access to a set of .o for use as a "convenience library" ? No, these variables are used to specify rules for the generators to put in the build files. Th

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

John Ellson wrote: Brad King wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which preprocesses and compiles, but not assembles the file (so that you get the assembler code).

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Brad King wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which preprocesses and compiles, but not assembles the file (so that you get the assembler code). Is there a way to do

Re: [CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which preprocesses and compiles, but not assembles the file (so that you get the assembler code). Is there a way to do this with macros ?

[CMake] how to add capability to generate preprocessed and not-yet-compiled files ?

Hi, it would be nice if it would be possible to have for each object file also a target which only preprocesses the file and one which preprocesses and compiles, but not assembles the file (so that you get the assembler code). Is there a way to do this with macros ? I almost think this would h