2011/1/11 Michael Hertling :
> On 01/11/2011 12:55 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>>
>> Because some information (like latest git commit as version string) is no
>> longer available when using a source package. Of course I can put the
>> generated files into the source tree, but that's kind of agains
2011/1/11 Michael Hertling :
> On 01/11/2011 09:48 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
[...]
>> The fact is CPack doesn't know much about "source package" and
>> in fact it package source using the CPACK_INSTALLED_DIRECTORIES directory
>> list.
>> (look at the genera
2011/1/11 Andreas Schneider :
> On Tuesday 11 January 2011 16:01:14 Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
>> I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Java developer (and also Fedora user) so it makes
>> me very happy to know that someone are working to integrate Java in
>> CMake. My question is: sho
2011/1/12 Alexey Livshits :
> Hello,
> how can I determine the path to installed target?
When ?
If it is inside a CMakeLists.txt i.e. at CMake time usually you can't
unless you specify absolute install path in your install rules.
> The problem is, if I
> set DESTDIR for example "D:\", I the insta
2011/1/12 Alexey Livshits :
>> Yes, make the tests run without installation. To give more advice, we'd
>> need to know more about those "dependencies". Are they other
>> executables? Data files? Libraries?
>
> Well, if I could do that, I wouldn't ask ;)
> I have 2 versions, which are built from the
2011/1/12 Tim St. Clair :
> As a side issue: not all platforms which support the TGZ natively
> support fakeroot.
>
> I think ownership rights should likely be a CPACK option as a result.
True off course.
Would you be willing to file a feature request and possibly a patch proposal?
--
Erk
Membre
2011/1/12 Tobias Ellinghaus :
> Am Tuesday 11 January 2011 schrub Eric Noulard:
>
> [...]
>
>> in fact I think the "real" source for this is the fact the CPack lacks
>> the notion
>> of "EXTRA" distribution file which is available with autoconf
2011/1/13 :
> Hello,
> I have a doxygen custom target defined which works fine when executed
> manually in visual studio but since it is a custom command it is not added as
> dependency to ALL_BUILD
you can add it to ALL if you specify ALL in add_custom_target:
"add_custom_target(Name [ALL] [c
2011/1/14 Thomas Petazzoni :
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:34:16 +0100
> Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>
>> The FindQt4 module requires the uic executable to be present, otherwise
>> it declares the Qt installation as invalid and bails out.
>>
>> However, Qt can be compiled without the GUI (which is interest
2011/1/14 Thomas Petazzoni :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:06:04 +0100
> Eric Noulard wrote:
>
>> Clinton Stimpson is the maintainer of the QT4 module
>> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
>>
>> He is usually responsive so I bet he w
2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi :
> I'm trying to invoke a program which increment the build number on a header
> file. I'm currently using the following statement:
> add_custom_command(OUTPUT "./BuildNumber.h" COMMAND "java" ARGS "-jar"
> "${TOOLS}\\BuildNumberUpda
2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi :
> Il 17/01/2011 11.09, Eric Noulard ha scritto:
>>
>> 2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to invoke a program which increment the build number on a
>>> header
I just realized something.
Do you want
A) to inc
2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi :
> Il 17/01/2011 12.34, Eric Noulard ha scritto:
>> I just realized something.
>> Do you want
>> A) to increase the build number EACH time you build
>> B) to increase the build number WHEN of of the SOURCES change?
>
> The B is de
2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi :
> Eric Noulard ha scritto:
>
> 2011/1/17 Andrea Galeazzi :
>
>
> Il 17/01/2011 12.34, Eric Noulard ha scritto:
>
>
> I just realized something.
> Do you want
> A) to increase the build number EACH time you build
> B) to incr
2011/1/17 Michael Jackson :
> I have the following code:
>
> if ( "${CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P}" EQUAL "8" )
> set(CPACK_PACKAGE_FILE_NAME "${PROJECT_NAME}-Win64")
> elseif( "${CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P}" EQUAL "4" )
> set(CPACK_PACKAGE_FILE_NAME "${PROJECT_NAME}-Win32")
> else()
> set(CPA
2011/1/18 luxInteg :
> Greetings,
>
> I am learning cmake. I progressed to doing configH checks (libtool to cmake
> conversion). I have followed useful tips I obtained from this list and this
> link:-
>
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:How_To_Write_Platform_Checks
>
>
> I have a test project
Hi All,
Is it possible to get the list of all targets defined in a project (or
CMakeLists.txt or directory ...)
from within a CMakeLists.txt ?
Is there some properties for this?
I did search but didn't find anything, but may be I didn't looked in
the right place?
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « p
2011/1/18 Olivier Pierard :
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to add a step for our NSIS installer in order to define an
> environment variable to locate a license file which is sent separately
> to the package (best would be locating it through a 'browse' button).
>
> I'm a little bit lost in the CPack
2011/1/18 Clifford Yapp :
> Sounds like this issue:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-September/039388.html
>
> I can confirm the wrapper function approach works, using it in BRL-CAD.
Right,
I think a little bit more about it but I think it would be a interesting feature
and I may try
2011/1/18 luxInteg :
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 08:23:49 Eric Noulard wrote:
>
>> May be you can post your CMakeLists.txt here if it's not too big?
>> What is your platform/compiler target?
>> Linux/gcc, Windows/Visual etc...
>> I bet the " -MT -MD -MP&q
2011/1/19 Jack Poulson :
> I have no idea why this would occur, but with CMake 2.8.2 on x86_64 I'm
> getting strange behavior with check_function_exists. Namely, if I perform
> the sequence
> set(CMAKE_REQUIRED_LIBRARIES ${MATH_LIBS})
> check_function_exists(daxpy HAVE_DAXPY)
> whether or not /usr/
2011/1/20 SF Markus Elfring :
>> Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
>> break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
>
> I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new name
> can provide the desired service to retrieve target parameter
2011/1/20 Rolf Eike Beer :
>> When you have such different "levels" of option you may do something like:
>>
>> OPTION(DEVELOPER_OPT_ENABLE "Enable developer options" OFF)
>> OPTION(SYSTEM_INTEGRATOR_OPT_ENABLE "Enable system integrator
>> specific options" OFF)
>> OPTION(TOOL_USERS_OPT_ENABLE "E
2011/1/25 luxInteg :
> On Tuesday 25 January 2011 07:53:24 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> On 25.01.11 02:57:27, luxInteg wrote:
>> > Greetings
>> >
>> > I am learning cmake
>> >
>> > consider my project with two directories dir1 and dir2
>> >
>> > if I want to:-
>> > move to dir1 and add a library l
2011/1/26 Michal Turlik
>
> Hi all
> I am trying to build and link against a dependency out of the source tree.
> I tried to arrange a custom target/command combo but it did not work.
> Could someone help me with this?
> What I really need is how to let cmake and make be correclty launched for
>
2011/1/27 Alexander Neundorf :
> On Thursday 27 January 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> > That's it currently.
>>
>> Is it possible that a field or attribute can specify a format identifier
>> (in the near future)?
>
> AFAIK nothing is planned.
> With "sounds doable" I meant that this looks like
2011/1/28 Дима :
> How can I change or disable C/C++ testing during cmake command?
project(YourProject NONE)
from the doc;
Set a name for the entire project.
project( [languageName1 languageName2 ... ] )
Sets the name of the project. Additionally this sets the variables
2011/1/31 Andreas Pakulat :
> On 31.01.11 17:18:58, Louis Hoefler wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> I try to generate a cmake project and want to
>> build shared and dynamic libraries in one step.
>>
>> I therefore added two targets:
>> ADD_LIBRARY(${fox_default_libname} STATIC ${fox_cpp_files}
>> ${fox
2011/2/1 Maarten Nieber :
> Hi everybody,
> I´m mailing to find out what the community thinks of my feature request
> (http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=5974), which was unfortunately
> rejected, and maybe come up with a better idea that serves the same goal.
> However, first I want to say
2011/2/2 Peter Kümmel :
> CMake 2.8.3:
>
> When I install with "mingw32-make install/strip"
> the installed files are stripped.
>
> But when I set CPACK_STRIP_FILES to 1 and
> use NSIS with "mingw32-make package" the binaries
> are not stripped.
>
> CPackConfig.cmake looks correct:
>
> SET(CPACK_BI
2011/2/2 Peter Kümmel :
> On 02.02.2011 13:43, Eric Noulard wrote:
>>
>> 2011/2/2 Peter Kümmel:
>>>
>>> CMake 2.8.3:
>>>
>>> When I install with "mingw32-make install/strip"
>>> the installed files are stripped.
>>>
2011/2/2 Clifford Yapp :
> Is there any way to customize the Makefile output from CMake to
> include user-defined lines (say, something like "#include
> Makefile.inc") at the end of each Make file?
None that I am aware of.
Could you tell us why would you do that?
What's inside "Makefile.inc" ?
2011/2/2 Michael Wild :
>
> Put a CMakeLists.txt file in a/ and b/ and do the include_directories()
> and add_library() calls in there. That's the only way to have separate
> include directories since there is no corresponding target property
> (which admittedly would be nice to have).
As a workar
2011/2/2 Emmanuel Blot :
>> Currently, there is no way to turn this off.
>
> Very, very bad news ;-(
> IMHO, this is a recurrent issue with CMake. It seems there is no way
> to guarantee that a project that builds well with a version of CMake
> will build the same way with the next minor iteration
2011/2/2 Bill Hoffman :
> On 2/2/2011 11:14 AM, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, there is no way to turn this off.
>>
>> Very, very bad news ;-(
>> IMHO, this is a recurrent issue with CMake. It seems the
>
> I was wrong. Please read Brad King's posts on this, and then see if it
> answers y
Forgot the list initially
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Noulard
Date: 2011/2/2
Subject: Re: [CMake] Executable in the main directory
To: Enrique Izaguirre
2011/2/2 Enrique Izaguirre :
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to create an executable in your top directory if
2011/2/3 mina adel :
>
>
> Hi All
>
> In my code I use an available libraries (amd btf colamd)
>
> In order to compile those using cmake I use add_custom_command() to "cd"
> into each folder and then run "make" for each library.
You should have a look at:
ExternalProject_Add from the ExternalProje
2011/2/4 mina adel :
> Hi,
> Thank you so much for your reply.
>
> About archiving the libraries, can I use "ar" with "custom_command()" to
> archive the three libraries into one big library.?
This may not work on all platforms.
Some people seems to do the same trick
http://www.mail-archive.com/cm
2011/2/3 David Cole :
> Hello CMakers,
>
> The CMake issue tracker is located at:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug
>
> All of the issues except for the most recent 15 or so have been assigned and
> looked at by at least one CMake developer at one point in each issue's
> history. However, not all iss
2011/2/4 Tyler Roscoe :
> (removing cmake-developers; cross-posting felt wrong)
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:34:45PM -0500, David Cole wrote:
>> Since we do not have a status of "backlog" -- but we don't really use the
>> status values of "acknowledged" or "confirmed" very much, I am thinking we
2011/2/4 Dominik Szczerba :
> I use try_compile to configure my project and it works fine on linux.
> On Windows I get a lovely assertion failure, when calling cmake from
> VC command line:
>
> (typos possible, typed from a popup window)
>
> Debug Assertion Failed!
> Program:
> .\cmTryC
2011/2/7 Clinton Stimpson :
>
> Is there a reason the archive generators append "-ALL" to the package file
> name
> I specify when I set CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_IN_ONE_PACKAGE=1?
>
> Can we leave that to the user to decide if they want "-ALL" by putting it in
> CPACK_PACKAGE_FILE_NAME?
Yes there is.
2011/2/7 Clinton Stimpson :
> On Monday, February 07, 2011 01:38:22 pm Eric Noulard wrote:
>> 2011/2/7 Clinton Stimpson :
>> > Is there a reason the archive generators append "-ALL" to the package
>> > file name I specify when I set CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL_IN_
2011/2/7 Crni Gorac :
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:09 PM, David Cole wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> The commit to fix this bug is in the 2.8.4-rc2 release candidate:
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11144
>>
>> With it, you can set CPACK_NSIS_MUI_FINISHPAGE_RUN to an executable in your
>>
2011/2/8 Martin O'Brien :
> While I too find myself sometimes wanting convenience scripts - some people
> find the use of '-DENABLE_=ON' instead of --enable-'
> foreign, for example - the problem with them, IMO, is that they're
> impossible to make crossplatform without requiring the presence of so
2011/2/8 Michael Wild :
> And there's the hidden trap that the -D options must be *before* the -P
> option. Very nasty, especially for people who never used CMake before.
Yes right I was caught by that in the past.
> On 02/08/2011 09:27 AM, Martin O'Brien wrote:
>> Absolutely, and that is what I
2011/2/8 Martin O'Brien :
> I've resisted the urge to patch, since I really don't want to be dependent
> on a custom version of CMake.
My idea was more like proposing a feature request + patch in order to make
the feature go in upstream CMake.
I cannot ensure it will but...
> As far as how many
2011/2/8 Mathieu Malaterre :
> All,
>
> I am trying to generate binary zip of my project using CPack 3.8.3
> and looks like now it generates two zip files where each file has the
> name of the group. Did anyone noticed this change ? How do I revert it
> back to the old behavior all groups in the s
2011/2/8 Mathieu Malaterre :
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks a bunch for your tremendous work !
You're welcome, feedback of this feature is welcomed.
> Quick question would this means that the warning will also go away:
>
> "CPack warning: both CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL and CPACK_MONOLITHIC_INSTALL
> have bee
2011/2/8 Clinton Stimpson :
>>
>> I also saw that warning with this example (there's nothing in this example
>> about a MONOLITHIC install):
>>
>> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
>> project(hello)
>> install(CODE "message(installing...)" COMPONENT Hello)
>> set(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL Hello)
>> se
2011/2/10 Nathan J. Mehl :
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:56 PM, David Cole wrote:
>>
>> Probably comes from here:
>> cmCPackDebGenerator.cxx:
>> this->SetOptionIfNotSet("CPACK_PACKAGING_INSTALL_PREFIX", "/usr");
>
> *DING*
>
> Sigh, would have been nice if that had been anywhere in the documenta
2011/2/11 Moritz Moeller :
> On 02/11/2011 09:56 AM, Moritz Moeller wrote:
>> None of the DSOs gets stripped. Is this intentional with shared libs?
>> Any workaround or anything I am missing?
>
> So I worked around this myself by setting
>
> set( CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS -s )
>
> And I am aware I
2011/2/11 Moritz Moeller :
> On 02/11/2011 10:57 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>> Which kind of CPack package are you building?
>> DEB, RPM, TGZ, etc...
>
> I am building a tbz2.
> But this should happen long before the package is compressed, innit.
Nope.
With CPACK_STRIP_FILES
2011/2/14 Robert Bielik :
> Hi all,
>
> I seem to be missing something, cause I cannot find a target property for
> setting additional library directories (for a MSVC project)
Usually you do not specify "additional lib directories" you should
specify all libs you need with "target_link_libraries".
2011/2/15 Daryl N :
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on the use of CPack. I have CMake setup to generate
> binaries and shared libraries. Up until now I have only created a TGZ with
> rpath set to ".". This has worked nicely, but now I would like to create a
> Debian package for proper installation.
2011/2/15 David Cole :
> You cannot do "cmake-ish" things in the CPACK_PROJECT_CONFIG_FILE.
>
> Neither install commands nor set_target_properties calls do anything in this
> context.
Yes you are right, but we may have expected that
"CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH" may be used at INSTALL time
just like "CMAK
2011/2/15 Yngve Inntjore Levinsen :
> Dear CMakers,
>
> I am trying to package a 32bit binary on a 64bit system. It breaks with the
> (useless?) verbose output which follows below. What I could find of useful
> information was in _CPack_Packages/Linux/RPM/rpmbuild.err, which stated
> error: No co
2011/2/16 Yngve Inntjore Levinsen :
> Dear Eric,
>
> First, thank you for a very quick reply!
>
> The log you requested is attached. The rpmbuild.out file is empty, and the
> rpmbuild.err has one line which states:
> error: No compatible architectures found for build
>
> I am using cmake/cpack ver
2011/2/16 Yngve Inntjore Levinsen :
>
> The server OS is quite conservative when it comes to new packages, so I
> already had to go into a fight to get 2.6 series installed. I do not think
> that is possible system-wide but I am of course able to compile cmake myself
> and put it on my own share
2011/2/17 Yngve Inntjore Levinsen :
> Dear Eric,
>
> So I answered my own question perhaps, the very issue was in fact that I set
> CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE to i686 when I tried to build. Commenting out
> that part and the packaging worked.
OK.
> Two questions:
>
> - Will this package now
2011/2/17 Felipe Ferreri Tonello :
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 06:15:34 Nicolas Desprès wrote:
>>
>> That being said, I feel sad to see other CMake's like projects started
>> instead of contributing.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> I'm with you. I don't know why there are companies or people who starts other
2011/2/21 Łukasz Tasz :
> Hi All,
>
> Could somebody help me how to provide own predefined make varibable from
> cmake configuration?
> Such a variable should be avaliable in the context of all generated
> makefiles.
Since the makefiles are generated by CMake WHY do you need
to define a "make" var
2011/2/21 Łukasz Tasz :
> 2011/2/21 Eric Noulard :
>> What is your use case?
>
> In my case I'm making integration with ccache, and distcc, and as you
> know all of them are tuned only via ENV_VARS.
> Depending on CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE, compiler version, OS I would
2011/2/21 Michael Wild :
>>> Do you know such a call can be configured?
>>> for example:
>>> export MYVARIABVLE=test; cd dir; compiler_call
>>
>> I don't think there is an easy way to do that from within CMake.
>> You would need some way to set env var "before" launching the compile rule
>> the on
2011/2/24 thehighhat :
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:20 PM, David Cole wrote:
>> Do you have the same problem if you use a real binary for the 'make' instead
>> of this symlink?
>
> Yes, the same problem persists.
>
> I started with a clean builddir. Changed all references to use the
> actual file
2011/2/25 Martin O'Brien :
> I haven't really read most if this thread, so this may not apply, but this
> dialog box can be caused by trying to run a Win64 application on Win32, or
> trying to run any binary other than Win32 with a format that Windows
> understands on Win32.
Interesting,
Is the N
2011/2/27 :
> Hello i got some bug.
> I use W7 and username "C&C".
> So when i run "Configure" in gui under this user, Cmake throws an error:
> "cant build simple programm... and more unknown chars..." (full error log
> attached) and this not error of compiler.
> But when i run it on other user n
2011/2/26 Orcun Gokbulut :
> I'm trying to find out a way to generate multiple packages from a big
> project. There are some patches and hack available but I'm not experienced
> cmake user and I can not figure out how to use them.
>
> IMHO, an add_package command can be usefull instead of configuri
2011/2/28 Stephen Thomas :
> Hello,
> I'm very new to cmake and I'm attempting to build the webcamtools package.
> While I've been able to get CMake to work properly on the host I'm working
> on I really need it to configure for cross-compiling to a embedded ARM
> TS-7800 board. In reading throug
2011/3/3 Alexey Livshits :
> Hello CMakers,
> suppose I've got a library foo with tow configurations: foo_1 and
> foo_2. Both versions should have the same output name: foo. The
> problem is, the output directory for both ist the same, so the second
> will overwrite the first.
You can definition t
2011/3/4 Alexey Livshits :
>> You can definition two different library target
>> and use OUTPUT_NAME property to adjust the name
>>
>> add_library(foo1 ${foo_source})
>> set_target_properties(foo1 PROPERTIES
>> OUTPUT_NAME foo)
>>
>> add_library(foo2 ${foo_sour
2011/3/4 Laszlo Papp :
> Hi,
>
> Can I create an rpm package with cpack in order to not deal with spec files ?
Yes you can CPackRPM is meant to do that:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:CPackPackageGenerators#RPM_.28Unix_Only.29
The fastest path is to try:
$ cd /path/to/builddir
$ cpack -G RPM
>
2011/3/4 Alexey Livshits :
>> I am not a Visual Studio user so I may be missing your point here
>> but why having foo_1 and foo_2 ending up in the same workspace is a problem?
>>
>> As long as the lib/dll end up in separate dirs (using *_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY).
>
> Workspaces become too large, so I woul
2011/3/4 Laszlo Papp :
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>> 2011/3/4 Laszlo Papp :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can I create an rpm package with cpack in order to not deal with spec files
>>> ?
>>
>> Yes you can C
2011/3/5 Tim Gallagher :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use cmake with the Cray Fortran compiler. The compiler is
> wrapped through a script called ftn.
>
> When I have the PrgEnv-pgi (pgi compiler) or the PrgEnv-gnu modules loaded,
> it works with no issue.
>
> But, when I have it set to PrgEnv-cray, i
2011/3/5 Tim Gallagher :
> Eric,
>
> Excellent! Thanks!
>
> I don't know a whole lot about CMake (yet) -- would it be possible to make
> older versions aware of the compiler if I were to package only the updated
> files rather than install my own version of CMake? In other words, was it
> someth
2011/3/5 Laszlo Papp :
> Well, first I cannot build :)
I thought you were already using CPack for Deb package?
If you never used a cross-compiling setup with CMake then
read this first:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling
[...]
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le
2011/3/5 Tim Gallagher :
> It's not an option to do a global install. These are US government owned
> clusters. I asked them if they could install it and they won't for awhile --
> they tend to remain a few versions back on everything until they run
> extensive tests on new versions.
Conservati
2011/3/5 Laszlo Papp :
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>> 2011/3/5 Laszlo Papp :
>>> Well, first I cannot build :)
>>
>> I thought you were already using CPack for Deb package?
>>
>> If you never used a cross-compiling setup w
2011/3/6 Laszlo Papp :
> CPack froze for hours What happened ? Seems a "nice" infinite loop...
> Idea ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp
>
> cpack
> CPack: Create package using RPM
> CPack: Install projects
> CPack: - Run preinstall target for: Gluon
try with verbose/debug mode:
cpack --verbo
2011/3/6 Laszlo Papp :
> Hi,
>
> I do not get the infinite loop right now (not sure what caused it
> then), but I get an error while trying.
>
> djszapi@djszapi:/home/meego/gluon/buildroot /home/meego/gluon/build # cpack
> CPack: Create package using RPM
> CPack: Install projects
> CPack: - Run pr
2011/3/6 Laszlo Papp :
> Mmh, my previous mail is blocked because the cpack.log is too big.
>
> http://djszapi.homelinux.net/rpmbuild.out
> http://djszapi.homelinux.net/rpmbuild.err
> http://djszapi.homelinux.net/cpack.log
I do not quite understand what makes rpmbuild fail.
Could you send me [a l
2011/3/7 Laszlo Papp :
> Any progress on it ?
Nope.
I won't be very responsive this week.
> One more information, this n900-devel image uses
> internally qemu and I am not sure that can cause any issue for the
> build system.
I don't like I said I'm not that experienced with cross-compiling env.
2011/3/7 Laszlo Papp :
> As said, the working OBS spec files can be found here:
> http://repo.pub.meego.com/home:/sandst1/standard/armv7l/
> http://repo.pub.meego.com/home:/sandst1/standard/i586/
Not really, since binary RPMs do not contains the spec file,
but I did find the spec file in src:
http
2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp :
> Well: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11595
> That is fixed in cmake 2.8.4.
> Changelog: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-February/042839.html
> "CPackRPM fix bug 0011595 : Can't generate RPMs (on FC11...)"
>
> I am trying to build this version now on Me
2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp :
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
>> 2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp :
>>> Well: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11595
>>> That is fixed in cmake 2.8.4.
>>> Changelog: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-Februa
Hi,
I am starting a separate thread on this "hanging" issue.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Laszlo Papp
Date: 2011/3/8
Subject: Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages
To: Eric Noulard
Cc : CMake ML
1st run:
ca
-- The C compiler identification is GNU
-- The CX
2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp :
> I could not still build cmake.. But I did this modification
> locally you suggested and that is the output:
>
> CPack: Create package using RPM
> CPack: Install projects
> CPack: - Run preinstall target for: Gluon
> CPack: - Install project: Gluon
> CPack: Create packag
2011/3/8 NoRulez :
> Hello everyone,
>
> is there a way to generate sub and sub sub components with CPack and Nsis?
Yes theoretically there is.
But I never tried.
> I would like to have the following structure, but I couldn’t figure out how
> to do this:
>
> Component
> |
> +---
2011/3/8 NoRulez :
> Ok,
>
> I mean a parent group instead of sub component.
> But i doesn't find any documentations about this too.
look in CPack.cmake
or
cmake --help-module CPack
> If it isn't implemented in CPack, can i mix cpack and nsis scripts, and if so
> how?
CPack is using a NSIS tem
2011/3/10 David Cole :
> Well if the build directory is *in* the source directory, then make
> package_source *should* include it.
>
> This is not a problem, but the expected behavior.
> If you don't want the build tree in the source tree, then don't put it
> there.
Or do include "${CMAKE_BINARY_D
2011/3/9 David Cole :
> This is a question for folks at Stack Overflow. Literally. :-)
>
> I'm assuming you mean "_add_library(${name} ${ARGN})"?
>
> The "override and call original with a leading _" is probably not well
> documented anywhere. While it's useful on occasion, we do not recommend
> us
2011/3/13 徐亮 :
> I have a big project that include lib1, lib2, app1, app2.
> Before CPack 2.8.4, app1 and app2 have standalone CMakeLists.txt and
> pack RPM independently. So I can set different pre/post install
> scripts to these RPMs.
> In CPack 2.8.4, I can generate two component RPM for app1 a
2011/3/14 The Wanderer :
> (I apologize for setting the Reply-To header, but I know of no other way
> to prevent my being sent an additional off-list copy of any reply even
> when there is no specific need to draw my attention to that reply.)
> I am running cmake 2.8.2, installed via Debian testin
2011/3/14 Enrique Izaguirre :
> Hello friends,
>
> I have a problem when I try to compile several files, for some reason it
> takes only the first of the list to build it.
> It displays a few warnings and at the end the following error:
>
> make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/omap.dir/host/fastboot.c.o] Error
2011/3/15 Robert Bielik :
> Robert Bielik skrev 2011-03-15 08:59:
>>
>> Using 2.8.4, I'm trying to add an assembler file with cmake (64 bit VS2008
>> build), but I'm at a loss, I tried:
There has been a lot of work done (Alex and Brad I think) in topic
"ReworkedAsmSupport"
it has been merged to ma
2011/3/17 Dixon, Shane :
> I want to add some messages at the end of cmake that display all the
> DEB-related variables and what they’re set to. I’d prefer to now shows
> these when building on windows where DEB isn’t available. Is there
> something like
>
>
>
> If(DEBIAN_FOUND)
This is not cu
2011/3/18 Caner Candan :
> Hi all,
>
> Since I have several targets to compile, I was looking for a way to
> set some specific flags to one target among all others. In my example
> I would like to set the openmp flag to the target test and I got an
> error with the code below:
>
> -
2011/3/25 Tyler :
> I just use:
>
> set (CPACK_GENERATOR "ZIP")
>
> and that seems to work.
>
> I think those CPACK_BINARY_* variables you're setting are only
> meaningful in CPack's context, not in CMake's (i.e. those vars are
> what CMake writes out in CPackConfig.cmake for Cpack's later use).
T
2011/3/29 David Cole :
>
> Please discuss issues here as needed, and add notes to existing issues in
> the bug tracker that you are interested in seeing fixed for 2.8.5 -- we will
> be looking at the mailing list and activity in the bug tracker to help
> prioritize the bug fixes that will occur ove
201 - 300 of 1869 matches
Mail list logo
