Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread David Cole
Hi Rolf, Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...) http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=680ca4baab85cbc1be98bcfd81b7e4402ffa8d84 We are supposed to have a continuous and a nightly

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread David Cole
FYI: The output that you see, both directly from ProcessorCount.cmake, and indirectly from the tools that it calls to try to determine the processor count, will be eliminated shortly (over the next few days)... but for now... it is being left in for "dashboard diagnostics" so that I can see what i

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: > Hi Rolf, > > Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this > morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...) > > http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=680ca4baab85cbc1be98bcfd > 81b7e4

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/11/8 David Cole : > FYI: > The output that you see, both directly from ProcessorCount.cmake, and > indirectly from the tools that it calls to try to determine the processor > count, will be eliminated shortly (over the next few days)... but for now... > it is being left in for "dashboard diagn

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: > Hi Rolf, > > Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this > morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...) Still needs some tweak, as the output is: getconf: Can't find _NPROCESSORS_ONLN Process

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: Hi Rolf, Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...) Still needs some tweak, as the output is: getco

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: > If they're really "cluttering" your output, then you're calling it too > much. You should only have to call this function once at the top level, > and just use the result from then on. I'm currently not calling it at all since there is no version s

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: > I'm leaving that output in there on purpose to see what happens on all of > our dashboard machines. I will not eliminate this extraneous output until > later. > > But, don't worry, this will not be merged to master until all the > extraneous output

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman: > On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: > >> Hi Rolf, > >> > >> Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this > >> morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch,

Re: [cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

2010-11-08 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman: On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole: Hi Rolf, Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this morning on a QNX machine?