Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=680ca4baab85cbc1be98bcfd81b7e4402ffa8d84
We are supposed to have a continuous and a nightly
FYI:
The output that you see, both directly from ProcessorCount.cmake, and
indirectly from the tools that it calls to try to determine the processor
count, will be eliminated shortly (over the next few days)... but for now...
it is being left in for "dashboard diagnostics" so that I can see what i
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
> morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
>
> http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=680ca4baab85cbc1be98bcfd
> 81b7e4
2010/11/8 David Cole :
> FYI:
> The output that you see, both directly from ProcessorCount.cmake, and
> indirectly from the tools that it calls to try to determine the processor
> count, will be eliminated shortly (over the next few days)... but for now...
> it is being left in for "dashboard diagn
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
> morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
Still needs some tweak, as the output is:
getconf: Can't find _NPROCESSORS_ONLN
Process
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
Still needs some tweak, as the output is:
getco
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
> If they're really "cluttering" your output, then you're calling it too
> much. You should only have to call this function once at the top level,
> and just use the result from then on.
I'm currently not calling it at all since there is no version s
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
> I'm leaving that output in there on purpose to see what happens on all of
> our dashboard machines. I will not eliminate this extraneous output until
> later.
>
> But, don't worry, this will not be merged to master until all the
> extraneous output
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
> On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
> >> Hi Rolf,
> >>
> >> Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
> >> morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch,
On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine?
10 matches
Mail list logo