The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12521
==
Reported By:Bernhard Sputh
Assigned To:
Hi,
I've been pushing some changes to the unit tests on
the cmake-link-interface-libraries branch which is merged into next.
Where the unit tests that I wrote were failing before in some cases, my
changes make the dashboard go green again, but they don't actually make
CMake any better.
That
Hi,
I'm currently trying to add support for the source_group() command to the
Eclipse project generator.
It's not as straighforward as I expected.
I expected that if I do
source_group(Foo FILES main.cpp)
in the CMakeLists.txt, that then in the generate step, there would be a
cmSourceGroup obj
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> What I'd like to see is a distinction of feature support from platform
> support. In my case, I care about writing some features in cmake, but I
> don't care about watcom, GCC 3.3.1 etc. What I'd like to do is make sure my
> feature works on some 'reference platforms', which
2011/10/13 Brad King :
> On 10/13/2011 2:14 PM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
>>
>> 2011/10/13 Nicolas Desprès:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review. I have fix all the remarks.
>>
>> Pushed on my github:
>> https://github.com/polrop/CMake/commits/some-documentation-fixes
>
> That looks pretty good. I have two
On 10/16/2011 02:56 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Oct 16, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Having so many old platforms and compilers on the dashboard going red with
failure
So, I think I'm talking about two separate issues. One is whether failures
on platforms I don't care about are m
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
>> What I'd like to see is a distinction of feature support from platform
>> support. In my case, I care about writing some features in cmake, but I
>> don't care about watcom, GCC 3.3.1 etc. What I'd like to do is make sure
>> my feature works on so
On Oct 16, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On 10/16/2011 02:56 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> Having so many old platforms and compilers on the dashboard going red with
>>> failure
>>> So, I think I'm talking about two separate iss
Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2011, 01:24:59 schrieb Stephen Kelly:
> Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> What I'd like to see is a distinction of feature support from platform
> >> support. In my case, I care about writing some features in cmake, but
> >> I
> >> don't care about watcom, G
