Re: [cmake-developers] Patch to support SVN externals in CTest update

2012-09-03 Thread Xavier Besseron
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Brad King wrote: > > On 08/24/2012 08:50 AM, Xavier Besseron wrote: > > I have split my changes in a series of small patches. Please find them > > in attachment. > > I have made sure that everything is compiling correctly and that the > > CTest.UpdateSVN test runs

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013509]: FindBLAS.cmake cannot find acml5.1.0

2012-09-03 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13509 == Reported By:Bogdan Cristea Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013510]: OBJECT_DIR is not expanded for Ninja generator

2012-09-03 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13510 == Reported By:raspy Assigned To: =

Re: [cmake-developers] Version support for FindSDL_net.cmake

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/01/2012 08:10 AM, Benjamin Eikel wrote: > Hello again, > > Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012 um 12:39:28 schrieb Benjamin Eikel: >> Dear CMake developers, >> >> I extended the find module for SDL_net by version support (see the attached >> patch). If you are interested, I am willing to write simi

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake command line options -H and -B

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/02/2012 11:03 AM, Benjamin Eikel wrote: > I have a question concerning the command line options "-H" and "-B". The > usage > information says that "-H" shows the help, which is true when "-H" does not > receive any parameters (see cmDocumentation.cxx:1120ff). But when there is a > paramet

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013511]: Cannot use with VS 2012 RTM for ARM platform

2012-09-03 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13511 == Reported By:Sergey Yakovlev Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Patch to support SVN externals in CTest update

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/03/2012 05:17 AM, Xavier Besseron wrote: > Here is the new set of patches. Wonderful, thanks! I've merged the topic with minor tweaks to our 'next' branch for testing: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=7fbbd921 You can fetch and checkout commit b7c97859 to get the head

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013512]: no platform files are shipped for Blue Gene/Q

2012-09-03 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13512 == Reported By:Julien Bigot Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] Added very basic Windows CE Makefile support

2012-09-03 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:22:47 -0400, David Cole wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: Hi, On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:46:02 -0400, David Cole wrote: Brad merged one of your commits to 'next' today. Cool. He's coincidentally working on getting compiler ID unifor

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] Added very basic Windows CE Makefile support

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/03/2012 10:52 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > I saw that Brad merged one of my changes. Are there any other changes > the WinCE stuff depends on to get merged? Please rebase the remainder of the topic on upstream master, at least as recent as commit 25b0d946. Your changes will need to accou

Re: [cmake-developers] conditionals in generator expressions

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 08/31/2012 07:21 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > The above is not necessary. It can instead be literally: > > "$<$:-Wl,no-undefined>" > "$<$,$,b>>:-Wl,no-undefined>" > > The comma is ambiguous to the parser, but not to the generator expression. > I've updated my -refactor branch to deal with i

Re: [cmake-developers] conditionals in generator expressions

2012-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
Brad King wrote: > On 08/31/2012 07:21 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> The above is not necessary. It can instead be literally: >> >> "$<$:-Wl,no-undefined>" >> "$<$,$,b>>:-Wl,no- undefined>" >> >> The comma is ambiguous to the parser, but not to the generator >> expression. I've updated my -ref

Re: [cmake-developers] conditionals in generator expressions

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/03/2012 01:05 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > With the CMake generator expressions, I don't know the nodes at parse time, [smacks forehead] > So now that we've agreed on the language, and unless I've missed something, > I'll refactor that code to use helper methods rather than helper classes a

[cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
I use this command to get the current repository version number. Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' under linux or I obviously can't use that. Is there a test I can do in a cmakelists to test the shell processor? Is there something I can do to make this the same command? Under windows, wi

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread Brad King
On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: > I use this command to get the current repository version number. > > Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' > under linux or I obviously can't use that. > > Is there a test I can do in a cmakelists to test the shell processor? > > Is there something I

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Brad King wrote: > On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: >> I use this command to get the current repository version number. >> >> Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' >> under linux or I obviously can't use that. >> >> Is there a test I can do in a cmakelists

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread David Cole
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:15 PM, J Decker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Brad King wrote: >> On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: >>> I use this command to get the current repository version number. >>> >>> Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' >>> under linux or I obviously can't

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread David Cole
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, David Cole wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:15 PM, J Decker wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Brad King wrote: >>> On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: I use this command to get the current repository version number. Under windows I have

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
dir "c:\Program Files\tortoisehg Volume in drive C has no label. Volume Serial Number is F05B-C5AF Directory of c:\Program Files\tortoisehg 08/20/2012 10:47 PM33,544 hg.exe I don't know what hy.py would be . On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Cole wrote: > On Mo

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread David Cole
OK... Is hg.exe in the PATH? Do you get different results if you use the full path to hg.exe rather than just "hg"? On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:48 PM, J Decker wrote: > dir "c:\Program Files\tortoisehg > Volume in drive C has no label. > Volume Serial Number is F05B-C5AF > > Directory of c:\Prog

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, David Cole wrote: > OK... Is hg.exe in the PATH? Do you get different results if you use > the full path to hg.exe rather than just "hg"? > hg is in the path; although, when hg is not in the path, the result is the same. hg.exe is the same result PATH=C:\Windows;

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
I do have a workaround by taking the quotes out of the path... On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:23 PM, J Decker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, David Cole wrote: >> OK... Is hg.exe in the PATH? Do you get different results if you use >> the full path to hg.exe rather than just "hg"? >> > hg is

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread David Cole
That's not a workaround, that's the solution. The quotes don't belong there. On Sep 3, 2012, at 10:24 PM, J Decker wrote: > I do have a workaround by taking the quotes out of the path... > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:23 PM, J Decker wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, David Cole wrote:

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

2012-09-03 Thread J Decker
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cole wrote: > That's not a workaround, that's the solution. The quotes don't belong there. > I dunno seems to be an application specific failure > > > On Sep 3, 2012, at 10:24 PM, J Decker wrote: > >> I do have a workaround by taking the quotes out of t