Re: [cmake-developers] Adding Qt5 Support

2012-09-20 Thread Luis Kabongo
OK thanks Steve, the missing piece of information for me was the Known Issues. I understand this will be fixed at some point and that I don't need to invest more time on this then. Thanks! On 19 September 2012 23:18, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Bill Hoffman wrote: Here are some

Re: [cmake-developers] Exporting dependent library targets in multiple export sets

2012-09-20 Thread Brad King
On 09/19/2012 04:14 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Wednesday 19 September 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hmm, I was almost done implementing it... when creating the export file, we do not know how the Config file will be named, i.e. we do not know the name of the package, so we cannot set

[cmake-developers] RuntimePath test failures

2012-09-20 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, There are many failures of the RuntimePath test today. I can't reproduce the failure, and I don't see a pattern in the failing builds. I assume my branch is causing it though :). http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=159923423build=2572308 Can someone find out what is going on? I've

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013551]: CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX: mention in the documentation when it starts to be available

2012-09-20 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13551 == Reported By:Sylwester Arabas Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] RuntimePath test failures

2012-09-20 Thread Brad King
On 09/20/2012 08:01 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: There are many failures of the RuntimePath test today. I can't reproduce the failure, and I don't see a pattern in the failing builds. I assume my branch is causing it though :). http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=159923423build=2572308

Re: [cmake-developers] RuntimePath test failures

2012-09-20 Thread Stephen Kelly
Brad King wrote: Could someone run a test on one of the failing machines so we can narrow it down? I didn't track it down to the exact commit but something in the range 837d2b9f..d238d844 caused the order of the runtime search path on the RuntimePath executable to be switched: Interesting.

Re: [cmake-developers] RuntimePath test failures

2012-09-20 Thread Brad King
On 09/20/2012 08:42 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Brad King wrote: Could someone run a test on one of the failing machines so we can narrow it down? I didn't track it down to the exact commit but something in the range 837d2b9f..d238d844 caused the order of the runtime search path on the

Re: [cmake-developers] RuntimePath test failures

2012-09-20 Thread Stephen Kelly
Brad King wrote: It is fixed after the revert. Great, as I suspected. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

Re: [cmake-developers] Exporting dependent library targets in multiple export sets

2012-09-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 20 September 2012, Brad King wrote: On 09/19/2012 04:14 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Wednesday 19 September 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hmm, I was almost done implementing it... when creating the export file, we do not know how the Config file will be named, i.e. we do

Re: [cmake-developers] Exporting dependent library targets in multiple export sets

2012-09-20 Thread Brad King
On 09/20/2012 12:20 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: if(NOT TARGET Foo) if(CMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NAME) set(${CMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NAME}_FOUND FALSE) What happens if other imported targets have already been defined? Then the targets file will have been partially loaded.