Sorry about the indentation ... I've still got a bit of trouble
switching between coding conventions.
On that note, are there documented coding conventions, coding guidelines
or similar somewhere?
Nils
On 09/27/2012 11:01 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012, 17:10:20
Why is TIMESTAMP misleading?
Per default it currently outputs year, month, day, hour, minute and second.
This includes both a date (a day on a calendar) as well as time (time of
day).
"Timestamp" I'd define as both date and time bound to an event (here the
call or the (sub-)command).
"Date"
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13561
==
Reported By:icando
Assigned To:
=
Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2012, 17:10:20 schrieb Nils Gladitz:
> I've tried to reimplement this as a sting sub-command (patch attached).
Looks good, but the indentation looks wrong at some places.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
Powered by www.kitware.co
Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2012/9/27 David Cole :
> > H. Good idea.
> >
> > Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
> > "string(" like RANDOM is?
> >
> > And... while we're at it, I've always thought we should add the
> > ability to get the creation/modified/access t
2012/9/27 David Cole :
> H. Good idea.
>
> Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
> "string(" like RANDOM is?
>
> And... while we're at it, I've always thought we should add the
> ability to get the creation/modified/access times from a file via the
> CMake file
I've tried to reimplement this as a sting sub-command (patch attached).
Nils
--
Nils Gladitz, B.Sc.
DICOM, Konnektivität und Entwicklung
Scivis wissenschaftliche Bildverarbeitung GmbH
Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 5
D-37085 Göttingen
GERMANY
Handelsregister Nr. / Trade Register No. B3100 Göttingen
Ge
On 09/27/2012 08:59 AM, Brad King wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 08:37 AM, David Cole wrote:
>> Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
>> "string(" like RANDOM is?
>
> It should be a string(TIMESTAMP) subcommand.
We haven't added any top-level commands since 2008. At this
I wouldn't mind if this were a string subcommand.
Initially I wanted something like this to tag package filenames.
What gave me another push is this CMake test:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=160586053&build=2583145
It seems to fail on my system because it relies on the US locale
f
On 09/27/2012 08:37 AM, David Cole wrote:
> Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
> "string(" like RANDOM is?
It should be a string(TIMESTAMP) subcommand.
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/ope
H. Good idea.
Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
"string(" like RANDOM is?
And... while we're at it, I've always thought we should add the
ability to get the creation/modified/access times from a file via the
CMake file command. If we allow getting the "cur
I've tried creating a patch (attached; should apply to master) that adds
a timestamp creation command.
It builds on strftime but only allows a limited number of conversion
specifiers.
I tried to only allow those which are portable (C89), locale independent
and of fixed range and length (with the
12 matches
Mail list logo
