> Are you interested in working on a patch for this?
Yes, I'd give it a try. I signed up to Mantis, account: tamas.kenez so
you can assign it to me. I guess that's the next step.
Thanks,
Tamas
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 05:54 AM, Tamás Kenéz wrote:
>>> I t
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15520
==
Reported By:Walter Gray
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15519
==
Reported By:chenliang xu
Assigned To:
Great -- thanks for checking. This proposed change looks reasonable to me...
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Andrey Pokrovskiy
wrote:
>> does the external project's configure step re-run when you edit only the
>> CMAKE_CACHE_ARGS for it?
>
> Yes. Verified with the following example:
>
>
>
> does the external project's configure step re-run when you edit only the
> CMAKE_CACHE_ARGS for it?
Yes. Verified with the following example:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.2)
project(CMakeExternalProjectGenExpr)
include(ExternalProject)
set(ZF_QUEUE_INSTALL_PREFIX "${CMAKE_CURRENT_B
Le 17/04/15 15:50, Raffi Enficiaud a écrit :
Le 16/04/15 22:31, Brad King a écrit :
On 04/16/2015 04:19 PM, Domen Vrankar wrote:
I've pushed the patch with minor changes to next.
http://www.cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;h=0779b679
Thanks. The "fixup! " mark is useful only during incremental
d
Le 16/04/15 22:31, Brad King a écrit :
On 04/16/2015 04:19 PM, Domen Vrankar wrote:
I've pushed the patch with minor changes to next.
http://www.cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;h=0779b679
Thanks. The "fixup! " mark is useful only during incremental
development of an open topic. Once a commit is
On 4/16/2015 6:15 PM, Domen Vrankar wrote:
> I'm not certain that trying to squeeze the tests described above into
> RunCMake is the right way to go.
[snip]
> Would it be OK if I add something like CPackSemanticTests (I'm bad
> with names) into Tests directory and implement it similarly to
> RunCMa
On 04/16/2015 05:54 AM, Tamás Kenéz wrote:
>> I think the main challenge will be how to format error messages when
>> neither mode finds anything for a REQUIRED package.
>
> We can pretend they failed in the usual module;config order. So the
> wordings of the messages may remain as they are.
The
With this change, does the external project's configure step re-run
when you edit only the CMAKE_CACHE_ARGS for it?
(It did with the *.in / configure_file approach...)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Andrey Pokrovskiy
wrote:
> In current implementation of ExternalProject_Add generator express
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15518
==
Reported By:Paul "TBBle" Hampson
Assigned To:
11 matches
Mail list logo
