> My point is that an IDE should be able to edit the declarative spec
> without having run a configuration or even create a build tree. The
> spec should be the preferred form for making changes and stored in
> version control. Any intermediate spec generated by a procedural
> Language script
(For example, applying a long set of configurations for each
build target to be used as a plugin for an application with a lot of
restrictions).
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 11:45 AM, Shmuel H, wrote:
> > * From the other si
}
# Then, add my customized library:
my_add_library('myLib', 'myLib')
Note that it still would be possible to export these "scripted files" to a
simple JSON file.
I would be happy to hear your opinion about this general design.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:5
can't say that for every other user, but
I think it would make their life a lot easier too.
Kind regards,
Shmuel.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 04:23 PM, Shmuel H, wrote:
> > a few endless discussions about this topic
>
t;
> Best regards
> Jean-Michaël
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Shmuel H, <shmuelhcm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> First of all, I have been using CMake for a few years now, it is awesome
>> tool, thank you.
>>
>> The
blems with a language",
problems can be fixed, in this case, fixing them would result a completely
different language.
Regards,
Shmuel.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Pfeifer <dan...@pfeifer-mail.de>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Shmuel H, <shmuelhcm...@gmail.co
information, see the [closed] merge request #389
<https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/389>.
I would be happy to hear your opinion about this idea.
Best regards,
Shmuel H.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cma
