Thanks Brad,
I think I can use FLAGS for now then, but if my requirements get more
complicated I'll use OPTIONS and require 3.11. I think the docs change would be
helpful.
Cheers,
Harry
Harry Mallon
CODEX | Senior Software Engineer
60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT
E harry.mallon@
On 05/01/2018 06:33 AM, Harry Mallon wrote:
> I just noticed that COMPILE_OPTIONS is 3.11.0 only. I can’t understand
> from the docs which of COMPILE_OPTIONS or COMPILE_FLAGS is preferred
> and why I might use one or the other.
COMPILE_OPTIONS for targets has existed for a long time. What is
new
Hi all,
I just noticed that COMPILE_OPTIONS is 3.11.0 only. I can’t understand from the
docs which of COMPILE_OPTIONS or COMPILE_FLAGS is preferred and why I might use
one or the other. I will use COMPILE_FLAGS as it is supported on 3.10 (which we
have on our linux build machine) for now.
I am
