On 09/22/2014 12:08 PM, dev wrote:
> Please see last comment at
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15166
[snip]
> Your nightly process needs to have mercurial around it seems and not
> subversion or git which I have.
Only git is needed. If hg or svn is available some extra tests
are acti
It seems so. I was thrown off by the multiple levels of indirection
happening since the actual values in the OPTIONAL_INCLUDES end up as
"foo1;foo2-NOTFOUND;bar". I was thinking that if(VARNAME) would only work
if the value of VARNAME was actually "VARNAME-NOTFOUND" but that's not the
case, it wo
Am Montag, 1. September 2014, 14:35:41 schrieb Chuck Atkins:
> Back on topic...
>
> > Solaris 10 + SolarisStudio
> > http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=3470493
> > No build failures, 4 test failures
> >
> > Solaris 10 + GCC (from OpenCSW)
> > http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?bui
Back on topic...
> Solaris 10 + SolarisStudio
> http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=3470493
> No build failures, 4 test failures
>
> Solaris 10 + GCC (from OpenCSW)
> http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=3470687
> No build failures, 5 test failures
>
I dug more into the test
>
> > I've got a UltraSPARC III machine with Solaris 10 that I just checked.
>
> Still chugging along I bet.
>
Some days yes, some days no. The PSU shorted out and filled the server
room w/ smoke a few years ago. It was slated for the trash but it seemed
like a shame to toss a neat old RISC box
On August 30, 2014 at 5:10 PM Chuck Atkins
wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I've got a UltraSPARC III machine with Solaris 10 that I just checked.
Still chugging along I bet.
> From what I can tell, gcc has no build errors and currently the only
> Solaris Studio build error is in liblzma. Try applying th
Hi dev,
I've got a UltraSPARC III machine with Solaris 10 that I just checked.
>From what I can tell, gcc has no build errors and currently the only
Solaris Studio build error is in liblzma. Try applying the attached patch
if you're using SolarisStudio to fix the build problem. In the mean time
On 30.08.2014 22:09, dev wrote:
The problem is probably in my own head because I tend to define "work"
as
the ability to completely compile AND pass a testsuite. Which means that
by that definition GCC never "works" but it gets pretty close.
Perhaps "close" is good enough for now however I won't
On August 30, 2014 at 4:02 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. August 2014, 16:00:34 schrieben Sie:
> > > > I need cmake to build cmake ? You mean there is no way to
> > > > bootstrap
> > > > cmake with just a compiler and a good solid basic UNIX system ?
> > > >
> > > > really ?
> > >
>
Am Samstag, 30. August 2014, 16:00:34 schrieben Sie:
> > > I need cmake to build cmake ? You mean there is no way to bootstrap
> > > cmake with just a compiler and a good solid basic UNIX system ?
> > >
> > > really ?
> >
> > No, you need CMake to run the dashboard. There is a bootstrap script,
> >
> > I need cmake to build cmake ? You mean there is no way to bootstrap
> > cmake with just a compiler and a good solid basic UNIX system ?
> >
> > really ?
>
> No, you need CMake to run the dashboard. There is a bootstrap script,
> but you
> can't submit dashboard results with that.
OKay, s
Am Samstag, 30. August 2014, 15:36:04 schrieb dev:
> On August 30, 2014 at 1:04 PM Nils Gladitz
>
> wrote:
> > On 30.08.2014 17:20, dev wrote:
> > > So some time ago I tried, over and over, to get cmake to build on a
> > > Solaris server and needless to say it was a fairly frustrating
> > > exper
On August 30, 2014 at 1:04 PM Nils Gladitz
wrote:
> On 30.08.2014 17:20, dev wrote:
> > So some time ago I tried, over and over, to get cmake to build on a
> > Solaris server and needless to say it was a fairly frustrating
> > experience. There seems to be GNIisms and GCCisms built in as well
>
On 30.08.2014 17:20, dev wrote:
So some time ago I tried, over and over, to get cmake to build on a
Solaris server and needless to say it was a fairly frustrating
experience. There seems to be GNIisms and GCCisms built in as well as
other non-portable problems. Therefore I want to get a nightly b
So some time ago I tried, over and over, to get cmake to build on a
Solaris server and needless to say it was a fairly frustrating
experience. There seems to be GNIisms and GCCisms built in as well as
other non-portable problems. Therefore I want to get a nightly build
going and perhaps work on s
15 matches
Mail list logo
