Oops; I just got it through my thick head that this is an LLVM patch! OK,
much more helpful than I thought, thanks.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Dave Abrahams d...@boostpro.com wrote:
Yes, thanks, Brad. I hope one day we'll be able to use those features,
but I was hoping someone could
On 02/21/2014 09:53 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
look at the llvm/clang build and make some specific recommendations
There is a thread on llvm-commits and cfe-commits discussing changes
for exactly this purpose:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.scm/93120
-Brad
--
Powered by
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 19:59:44 -0800, Dave Abrahams wrote:
Thanks, but as far as I can tell, only static libraries are involved here
Would it be possible to build them as shared for a one-time run? If not,
you may be left with --gc-sections or removing all library linkings
until you get no
Hi there,
I'm following up on this recent thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/9324/focus=9330
Unfortunately, most of what was discussed there appears to involve advanced
CMake knowledge that I don't have. Would it be possible for someone to
look at the
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 18:53:48 -0800, Dave Abrahams wrote:
I'm following up on this recent thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/9324/focus=9330
Unfortunately, most of what was discussed there appears to involve advanced
CMake knowledge that I don't have.
Thanks, but as far as I can tell, only static libraries are involved here
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 18:53:48 -0800, Dave Abrahams wrote:
I'm following up on this recent thread:
