Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2012 um 07:38:44, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Try the patch below when building CMake against Ubuntu's libarchive. This one works. But wait ... checking again without the patch ... ERROR

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-11 Thread Brad King
On 06/11/2012 10:08 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=a34015d3 Hmm, may I ask, when it should (have been) be committed? I regularly check out the sources, but the change is still missing. The topic is in the 'next' branch of the Git repo. We have

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-11 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 10:10:16, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/11/2012 10:08 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=a34015d3 Hmm, may I ask, when it should (have been) be committed? I regularly check out the sources, but the

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-06 Thread Brad King
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Try the patch below when building CMake against Ubuntu's libarchive. This one works. But wait ... checking again without the patch ... ERROR You made it. Thanks for testing:

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2012 um 07:38:44, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Try the patch below when building CMake against Ubuntu's libarchive. This one works. But wait ... checking again without the patch ... ERROR

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags (was: Welcome to June, time for the next release candidate)

2012-06-05 Thread Brad King
On 06/05/2012 08:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: The builtin cmlibarchive in CMake 2.8.8 is libarchive 3.0.2, from svn rev 4051, now Git commit 28267d8f: On ubuntu 12.04 it is package libarchive12, version 3.0.3-6ubuntu1. Can you provide a simple script that reproduces a bad tarball using cmake

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags (was: Welcome to June, time for the next release candidate)

2012-06-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 13:19:31, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/05/2012 08:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: The builtin cmlibarchive in CMake 2.8.8 is libarchive 3.0.2, from svn rev 4051, now Git commit 28267d8f: On ubuntu 12.04 it is package libarchive12, version

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 15:35:15, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/05/2012 01:19 PM, Brad King wrote: On 06/05/2012 08:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: The builtin cmlibarchive in CMake 2.8.8 is libarchive 3.0.2, from svn rev 4051, now Git commit 28267d8f: On ubuntu 12.04

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Brad King
On 06/05/2012 04:04 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: However, there were very few changes between the two versions of libarchive, at least upstream: $ git rev-list --count 28267d8..v3.0.3 Maybe this version (3.0.2) is erroneous too. The last working version on ubuntu 11.10 was

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Brad King
On 06/05/2012 03:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Ok, I created a dir with 340 entries. (330 entries was not enough). Thanks. I see the header in the tarball you sent: $ tar xvzf ../data.tgz |wc -l tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword `SCHILY.fflags' 341 However, I cannot reproduce it.

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Brad King
On 06/05/2012 04:43 PM, Brad King wrote: Is there any change in Ubuntu's package for libarchive that is not upstream? I traced through the source to see how SCHILY.fflags can ever be added to the archive. I think it depends on whether the HAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_FLAGS test is true when libarchive

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 16:43:15, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/05/2012 03:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Ok, I created a dir with 340 entries. (330 entries was not enough). Thanks. I see the header in the tarball you sent: $ tar xvzf ../data.tgz |wc -l tar: Ignoring

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 16:27:28, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/05/2012 04:04 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: However, there were very few changes between the two versions of libarchive, at least upstream: $ git rev-list --count 28267d8..v3.0.3 Maybe this version (3.0.2)

Re: [cmake-developers] libarchive and SCHILY.fflags

2012-06-05 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 17:11:47, schrieb Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com On 06/05/2012 04:43 PM, Brad King wrote: Is there any change in Ubuntu's package for libarchive that is not upstream? I traced through the source to see how SCHILY.fflags can ever be added to the archive. I