On 8/17/2017 12:11 PM, Eric Wing wrote:
Oddly, I don't have any direct experience with FLTK even though I've
known about it for years. The projects I get involved with usually
need a lot more native UI integration, so FLTK is never on the list.
And I personally prefer native UI experience. But f
On 2017-08-17 08:55-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
On 8/17/17, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2017-08-17 04:15-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
I hope I'm doing this right...but the resulting program I think looks
correct testing on my Mac. Attached are two pictures.
The first is a simple label in a window.
The secon
> If small and self-reliant are the criteria, how does FLTK
> (http://www.fltk.org/index.php) stack up? For something like
> cmake-gui it would probably work just fine, and AFAIK it doesn't
> require GTK... it uses LGPLv2 with a static linking exception, so
> it's probably as good/better than the
On 8/17/17, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2017-08-17 04:15-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
>
>> I hope I'm doing this right...but the resulting program I think looks
>> correct testing on my Mac. Attached are two pictures.
>>
>> The first is a simple label in a window.
>> The second is from your MessageBox line
On 2017-08-17 04:15-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
I hope I'm doing this right...but the resulting program I think looks
correct testing on my Mac. Attached are two pictures.
The first is a simple label in a window.
The second is from your MessageBox line.
Yes, I confirm those two PNG images have that
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Eric Wing wrote:
>> Hi Eric:
>>
>> My opinion is your point about size is weak because IUP normally depends on
>> a big suite of graphical libraries in the GTK+ case or a big set of
>> system libraries such as GDI/GDI+/Uniscribe or Direct2D/DirectWrite in
>> the Wi
I hope I'm doing this right...but the resulting program I think looks
correct testing on my Mac. Attached are two pictures.
The first is a simple label in a window.
The second is from your MessageBox line.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the
On 2017-08-16 23:27-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
Thanks to your post the possibility now exists that I or one of my
PLplot colleagues will develop an IUP-based device driver in the
intermediate future. So if that occurs I would plan to download and
build IUP for myself on Linux. And that would put me
> Hi Eric:
>
> My opinion is your point about size is weak because IUP normally depends on
> a big suite of graphical libraries in the GTK+ case or a big set of
> system libraries such as GDI/GDI+/Uniscribe or Direct2D/DirectWrite in
> the Windows case.
>
On systems the provide first class native
On 2017-08-16 09:16-0700 Eric Wing wrote:
I am not making a strong push for this, but I want to bring it up to
at least get people thinking about this... I am disturbed by the size
and complexity of Qt. My past experiences have not been good and I
find it a massive chore to get an environment se
10 matches
Mail list logo