Hi Darrel,
(Disclaimer: I work for the company) I would recommend
taking a look at SuperUpdate:
http://www.superupdate.com
Under $500, works on *nix and Windows, and great for
content that gets constantly accessed and modified.
Let me know if I can answer any questions online or
offline.
Best r
>
> A lot of people recommend mt for a basic, free CMS, but I
> don't think it
> would really be applicable in this case. MT is really a CMS
> designed for
> news items. Somthing that gets created, then archived. Not really for
> content that gets constantly accessed and modified.
>
> A lot of
> A lot of people recommend mt for a basic, free CMS, but I
> don't think it would really be applicable in this case. MT is
> really a CMS designed for news items. Somthing that gets
> created, then archived. Not really for content that gets
> constantly accessed and modified.
I did get that
My CMS has a very simple (too simple) staging/deployment setup at the
moment. In our next rev, I'd like to improve on it.
I basically have two matching databases containing the data for the
site. All content changes go into the staging db, and the staging site
uses this db so you can preview ch
Hi all. I do not know if it is me who should answer these questions
(probably list moms), but I've been collaborating on this list for more
1.5 years and I've learned that everything within the CM field can be
discussed - Products, Vendors, Services, Marketing, Technology, Research
& Development, F
From: "Marnix Schrooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have been going through the CMS message board and read a lot of
> interesting stuff on CMS systems. I'm quite new to this industry and I
> wondered how long it would take to execute an implementation of a
> medium-sized CMS system (I know this is vag
It only came across to me that you probably wanted to include the sales
scheduled time within the implementation schedule which I've not for
obvious reasons.
For the scheduled time for a sales can be varies from 1 to 8 months, but
I concur with Lennard Regebro that in normal conditions can go at
(I sent this several hours ago, but it didn't show up. Apologies if you
get two copies).
My CMS has a very simple (too simple) staging/deployment setup at the
moment. In our next rev, I'd like to improve on it.
I basically have two matching databases containing the data for the
site. All content
>1. Can anyone provide a definition of 'Content' versus
>an 'Application'?
You bring up a very interesting point here. For many portal vendors, the
distinction between a portlet and a piece of content started off being quite
clear. A portlet is a piece of code that runs on the server - and it m
> Really, sounded like a
> custom XML structure would make more sense, like he wants to
> extend a knowledgebase very specific to his needs, and
> probably starting from the structure of the information
> itself would make more sense than starting with (and perhaps
> being limited to) the str
Does anyone have experience with building sport-betting sites? Which sites use a cms
or all sites are in-house projects?
Also, the betting sites must contain huge statistical data, and too much custom code.
Is there a product which can ease building sport betting sites?
Sites i've found
-
The short answer is to manage replication by collection. Collection is a
good unit for this type of management because of its open ended
definition. A collection is just a bunch of stuff that goes together. So
people tend to naturally understand and even expect that a collection as a
whole w
Sorry I wrote that Barton wrote:
> consulting phase, development phase, implementation phase, testing
> phase
It's not true. It was Marnix. (Really sorry Barton).
I believe I have a problem with the email delivery system. I've never
received the first Marnix message with the original question. I
Just a quick note of thanks for all the helpful e-mails on my need for an
Interwoven development team. Several people also offered suggestions about
best practices, other resources. Thanks-Rohn Jay Miller
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.
hmmm... sounds like a workflow issue. nothing a good cms won't fix. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nuno Lopes
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 7:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Gerald Barton'; 'Marnix Schrooyen'
Subject: RE: [cms-list]
Hi all,
I just wanted to thank everyone who replied to this thread. I presented
my information this past week and walked out with half of what I wanted.
All in all, I'm happy since I could have walked out with nothing.
Thanks to those who espoused workflows: the explanation of workflows
caused a
Hi all
Early next year, we will be doing a pilot that will include integration
of MCMS 2002 and SharePoint. Will be happy to provide info, learnings
from that experience.
Sandra Beach
Principal Consultant
Information Strategy and Systems
Department of Primary Industries
Making information sys
> Could you elaborate on this a bit more please?
> I've been keeping a vague eye on XML but have
> not as yet found a need for it - or seen where it
> might improve on what I'm doing.
XML is just one possible way to structure info. It can play a role
either in the maintenance of content, or in
I don't know what they use, but in my experience, sites that require
very intensive statistical and transactional capability are often better
built as a custom application. I don't think any available CMS would be
very efficient in managing and analysing huge amounts of numerical data.
The other
Charles Reitzel wrote:
The short answer is to manage replication by collection. Collection is
a good unit for this type of management because of its open ended
definition. A collection is just a bunch of stuff that goes together.
So people tend to naturally understand and even expect that a
Sveiki cms-list,
What do you thing about SiteSupra CMS www.sitesupra.com ?
I worked with it few project .. and i liked it most.
--
Vaidas Zilionis aka why2liz
http://why2liz.esu.as
tel. +370 650 515 35
ICQ 35174940
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.
Hi Morkai,
FWIW, I would suggest keeping it simple if that's all you require. XML - while
undoubtedly useful and extensible - is not a cosmic panacea. If it's clear how it
could add value, then use it. If not, then don't. I've seen a few CMS projects get
mired in scope/feature/technology creep
Unfortunately, my CMS experience is deeper than it is broad. In my own CMS
systems, I just used rsync on the top-level collection directories and
rebuilt the search indexes for each collection. I.e. Logically, I just
copy the collection to its destination. Under the hood, Rsync moves the
min
23 matches
Mail list logo
