I'm blogging (dobbscodetalk.com) on the subject of CMS Pipelines.
I like to drag images into the items. That makes a link to the original image.
Can anyone say whether I'd offend the host site by that sort of image paste?
http://vm.marist.edu/%7Epipeline/runtlibr.jpeg
Expected hits: 10k in a
Dave Jones wrote:
Hi, Jack.
I'm not the host owner, but I think that your use of the image is
within acceptable use.
Since you're blogging about CMS Pipelines, you might want to mention
some of the more
recent updates...support for named structures, new CRC and WARP
stages, etc.
It's much more
CMS-Piplelines bounced this, hope it doesn't get posted twice:
Dave Jones wrote:
Hi, Jack.
I'm not the host owner, but I think that your use of the image is
within acceptable use.
Okay, I dood it and we'll see if anyone hollers about it:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 17:06, Jack Woehr wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Hi, Jack.
I'm not the host owner, but I think that your use of the image is
within acceptable use.
Since you're blogging about CMS Pipelines, you might want to mention
some of the more
recent updates...support for named
On 30 Nov 2008 18:16:14 Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 17:06, Jack Woehr wrote:
No. UNIX has no deficiency of concurrency. In fact, of
Rexx, CLIST, JCL, and POSIX shell, only shell has intrinsic
constructs supporting concurrency.
I agree with that. There is a lot of support in
What I migth add is that the use of LOCATE the example is insafe.
When one show code to a broader public, the code should not leave too
many holes. The first LOCATE should better be PICK W3 == /DSC/, the
second LOCATE should become PICK W1 \== /VSM/.
2008/12/1 Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
