Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-08-26, at 23:28, Alan Altmark wrote: > > Unlike z/OS, the POSIX environment in CMS is integrated; it's not a > separate subsystem. > I'm not sure how this matters. For example, in z/OS JES is a separate(?) subsystem, but it feels integrated. > With an appropriate stage, the PIPE comma

[CMS-PIPELINES] Not at all "dead"

2017-08-27 Thread Thomas David Rivers
We've received a couple of notes from a mention on this e-mail list that we were "dead". I'd like to assure people that is not at all the case (I'm not sure why the opinion could even remotely be considered!) We just this month released our latest version 2.10 - about which you can learn more at:

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not at all "dead"

2017-08-27 Thread John P. Hartmann
I have already sent my apologies to Dave. I checked my facts and decided that things were quite alive, but forgot to delete the offending sentence before I sent my append. On 08/27/2017 03:55 PM, Thomas David Rivers wrote: We've received a couple of notes from a mention on this e-mail list that

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread Donald Russell
Thanks Alan, I just now submitted of RFE 09577 See http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=109577 On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Alan Altmark wrote: > Ya gotta get those RFEs opened. > > The IOCTL interface in TCP/IP now supports client and server transition >

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread Dave Jones
++1 On 08/27/2017 10:41 AM, Donald Russell wrote: > Thanks Alan, I just now submitted of RFE 09577 > > See > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=109577 > > > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Alan Altmark > wrote: > >> Ya gotta get those RFEs opened. >> >> The

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread Alan Altmark
USS is very much separate from MVS. CSL = Callable Services (Language). Google, man, google. Same goes for the Pipe storage stage. There are no stages I'm aware of that connect to an arbitrary fd, but you can write a stage that does that. Not sure where you're headed with this, Gil.

[CMS-PIPELINES] CSL (was: FTP ...)

2017-08-27 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-08-27, at 11:40, Alan Altmark wrote: > USS is very much separate from MVS. > Point of view? > CSL = Callable Services (Language). Google, man, google. Same goes for the > Pipe storage stage. > Getting there. > There are no stages I'm aware of that connect to an arbitrary fd, but

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread John P. Hartmann
If fd means filedescriptor, try pipe ahelp filedescriptor On 08/27/2017 07:40 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: USS is very much separate from MVS. CSL = Callable Services (Language). Google, man, google. Same goes for the Pipe storage stage. There are no stages I'm aware of that connect to an

[CMS-PIPELINES] CSL (was: FTP ...)

2017-08-27 Thread Paul Gilmartin
(Subject: changed -- this isn't FTP.) On 2017-08-27, at 13:04, John P. Hartmann wrote: > If fd means filedescriptor, try > > pipe ahelp filedescriptor > Bingo! Thanks! I notice revision codes for Level 1.1.9. Thanks again, gil

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] CSL

2017-08-27 Thread Dave Jones
Hi, Paul. I hope this helps some On 08/27/2017 01:06 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > On 2017-08-27, at 11:40, Alan Altmark wrote: > >> USS is very much separate from MVS. >> > Point of view? Yes, I suppose it depends on your point of view. MVS is made up of separate subsystems (implements as addr

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 08/27/2017 at 07:05 GMT, "John P. Hartmann" wrote: > If fd means filedescriptor, try > > pipe ahelp filedescriptor Since it's not in the list of supported states (pipe help), I have to be careful calling them out. But, yes, fd is a POSIX file descriptor. Alan Altmark Senior Managi

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] FTP stage that does encryption?

2017-08-27 Thread John P. Hartmann
Alan, aren't you on a least 6.4? FILEDESCRIPTOR should be there; in fact is has been in DMSPIPE ever since OpenExtensions went in, which is when we were young and handsome. But like so much else it was no doubt deemed too difficult to document other than in PIPE AHELP and later in the Author's ed