tating the obvious, if they are that good everyone would have
> one. Sounds like a gimmick to me.
>
> From: Josh Muckley via CnC-List
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 4:48 PM
> To: C List
> Cc: Josh Muckley
> Subject: Re: Stus-List spinnaker rig
>
> Andrew, with all due
Andrew, with all due respect your assessment may not be uninformed but it
does sound un-expierienced. I understand your position... I mean how hard
could it be to sail a spinnaker and if it's that hard then why do I want
it. Though, it is an unconventional sail which unless it was properly
Back in the ‘70s someone was making “puffy” chutes – they looked like Jerry
Seinfeld’s shirt. They didn’t last long.
From: Andrew Burton via CnC-List
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:31 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Andrew Burton
Subject: Re: Stus-List spinnaker rig
I'd venture to guess
I'd venture to guess that a regular kite would have worked equally well or
better for your friend. I did a fair bit of research on them, inspected (but
never flew) them, and talked to a lot of experts about the company's claims
about their product. When I was working on an article on downwind
Interesting comment, Andy — I’ve got a friend who’s got one up on Lake
Superior, and it’s worked well for him.
— Fred
Fred Street -- Minneapolis
S/V Oceanis (1979 C Landfall 38) -- on the hard in Bayfield, WI :^(
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:38 PM, Andrew Burton via CnC-List
>
ed message --
From: Josh Muckley <muckl...@gmail.com>
To: "C List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:36:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Stus-List spinnaker rig
On Apr 28, 2017 7:41 AM, "Kevin Deluzio via CnC-List" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
wrot
Really? wow! I'd love to hear more about your experience.
Josh
On Apr 28, 2017 9:39 PM, "Andrew Burton via CnC-List"
wrote:
> Snake Oil! Seriously. Stay away from it. Their claims are bunk.
> Andy
> C 40
> Peregrine
>
> Andrew Burton
> 61 W Narragansett
> Newport, RI
>
Snake Oil! Seriously. Stay away from it. Their claims are bunk.
Andy
C 40
Peregrine
Andrew Burton
61 W Narragansett
Newport, RI
USA02840
http://sites.google.com/site/andrewburtonyachtservices/
+401 965-5260
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 18:36, Josh Muckley via CnC-List
>
Others have expressed their appreciation for an asymmetric spinnacker which
I also echo. All of their points are valid, however you may find that the
effort involved with setting the A-sym just isn't worth the mild
improvement in speed/performance over an oversized headsail and whisker
pole.
Anybody have any thoughts on the parasailor?
http://www.parasailor.com/us/products/parasailor.html
Josh Muckley
S/V Sea Hawk
1989 C 37+
Solomons, MD
On Apr 28, 2017 7:41 AM, "Kevin Deluzio via CnC-List"
wrote:
> Hi All,
> This is my second season with my new to
#593
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Brown via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:28 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Michael Brown <m...@tkg.ca>
Subject: Re: Stus-List spinnaker rig
I will be prepping my mast next week and coul
Kevin,
First, the elevation of the exit/block for the pole lift is not critical.
+/- 2-4 feet should be OK.
Second, many of the older models had a "donut" on the forward side of the
mast for a pole lift exit. Simply a hole with a round metal washer-like
fitting.
My 35-1 has one of the donuts
I will be prepping my mast next week and could take measurements. I doubt you
would
want to mount a normal block on the front of the mast if you are carrying an
overlapping
headsail. It will rub and maybe catch on every tack. The 30-1 factory spinnaker
uphaul
fitting was a feedthrough with less
I'm sure you are going to hear this many times but if you don't race why not go
with an asymmetric spinnaker. No pole, no down haul and no lift. Much easier
to fly and better for reaching in light wind. Jerry J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Kevin Deluzio via CnC-List
14 matches
Mail list logo