Hi,
modifications required, or not considered useful?
Christian
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Christian Horn wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Jörgen Maas wrote:
> > The networking snippet should be updated to reflect the new interface_type
> > naming sch
Anything for SuSE's default sample.xml should first strive for parity with the
Red Hat example -- ideally it should set up networking, have the config
integration, etc.
I'm not against shipping a "complex" example showing more but "complex" should
not be the default. I'd like it to aim for pa
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Anything for SuSE's default sample.xml should first strive for parity
> with the Red Hat example -- ideally it should set up networking, have
> the config integration, etc.
The autoyast_complex.xml provides the network setup in rh
I think we're ok as is unless anyone has objections/suggestions.
Send me a github pull request and we can merge it.
Yes, it sounds like it should just replace the default if it more or less does
what the RHEL-compatible one does.
I was confused earlier because it had some bonus capabilities th
