Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-10 Thread Christian Horn
Hi cobbler-devel, there are some suse sles related things that could make sense to be included directly in cobbler. These pieces are currently here: https//fluxcoil.net/doku.php/cobbler/sles . Uwe, I think the existing suse pieces are from you, so you might be able to point out some things I am

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-10 Thread Michael DeHaan
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christian Horn wrote: > Hi cobbler-devel, > > > there are some suse sles related things that could make sense to > be included directly in cobbler. > These pieces are currently here: > https//fluxcoil.net/doku.php/cobbler/sles > (http://fluxcoil.net/do

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-13 Thread Christian Horn
Hi cobbler-dev, On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:22:51PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christian Horn wrote: > > > there are some suse sles related things that could make sense to > > be included directly in cobbler. Suming up the patch (against current git):

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Horn
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:33:39PM +0100, Christian Horn wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:22:51PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Christian Horn wrote: > > > > > there are some suse sles related things that could make sense to > > > be included directly

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-20 Thread Jörgen Maas
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Christian Horn wrote: > > Any comments? > Hi Christian, The networking snippet should be updated to reflect the new interface_type naming scheme for bonded interfaces. I never got around to fixing that after i submitted the SuSE snippets. Also support for the $s

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-20 Thread Michael DeHaan
> > Also; > Personally i think it's better to include as much useable autoyast > snippets/stuff in Cobbler even if they're not implemented yet for RHEL. In my > opinion the included stuff should be a starting point for users, not an > out-of-the-box-one-size-fits-all solution. > A base conf

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-21 Thread Christian Horn
Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Jörgen Maas wrote: > The networking snippet should be updated to reflect the new interface_type > naming scheme for bonded interfaces. New version of the patch attached, did you have that in mind? > Also support for the $subnet variable > (now $ne

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-01-21 Thread Christian Horn
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:32:05PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > > > Also; > > Personally i think it's better to include as much useable autoyast > > snippets/stuff in Cobbler even if they're not implemented yet for > > RHEL. In my opinion the included stuff should be a starting point > > f

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-02-02 Thread Christian Horn
Hi, modifications required, or not considered useful? Christian On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Christian Horn wrote: > Hi, > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Jörgen Maas wrote: > > The networking snippet should be updated to reflect the new interface_type > > naming sch

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-02-02 Thread Michael DeHaan
Anything for SuSE's default sample.xml should first strive for parity with the Red Hat example -- ideally it should set up networking, have the config integration, etc. I'm not against shipping a "complex" example showing more but "complex" should not be the default. I'd like it to aim for pa

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-02-02 Thread Christian Horn
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > Anything for SuSE's default sample.xml should first strive for parity > with the Red Hat example -- ideally it should set up networking, have > the config integration, etc. The autoyast_complex.xml provides the network setup in rh

Re: Some questions regarding extension of cobbler suse snippets/templates

2012-02-02 Thread Michael DeHaan
I think we're ok as is unless anyone has objections/suggestions. Send me a github pull request and we can merge it. Yes, it sounds like it should just replace the default if it more or less does what the RHEL-compatible one does. I was confused earlier because it had some bonus capabilities th