>> I suggest to handle the desired search result counter
>> by an other data processing interface.
>> How would you like to treat program execution failures otherwise?
>
> I'm trying to run SmPL programs as part of a CI pipeline, so execution
> failure and (buggy) code pattern not found really
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:40:10PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> > changes have been found.
>
> I got used to the interpretation that a zero exit status
> should indicate a successful execution of the program.
I agree, but
> I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> changes have been found.
I got used to the interpretation that a zero exit status
should indicate a successful execution of the program.
> @finalize:python@
> @@
> exit(cnt)
>
> where cnt is incremented by another
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> > > changes have been found.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Paul Chaignon wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> > changes have been found. I have tried to add a rule with finalize:python
> > and the
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> changes have been found. I have tried to add a rule with finalize:python
> and the following code:
>
> @finalize:python@
> @@
> exit(cnt)
>
> where cnt is
Hi everyone,
I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
changes have been found. I have tried to add a rule with finalize:python
and the following code:
@finalize:python@
@@
exit(cnt)
where cnt is incremented by another Python rule everytime a required
change is
