Re: … the actual OpenSSL

2015-01-11 Thread Uli Kusterer
On 12 Jan 2015, at 02:48, Marco S Hyman wrote: >> My question is in two parts: > > See https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable > > "The resulting library and 'openssl' utility is largely API-compatible with > OpenSSL 1.0.1. However, it is not ABI compatible - you will need to relink > you

Re: … the actual OpenSSL

2015-01-11 Thread Marco S Hyman
> My question is in two parts: See https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable "The resulting library and 'openssl' utility is largely API-compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.1. However, it is not ABI compatible - you will need to relink your programs to LibreSSL in order to use it, just as in moving f

… the actual OpenSSL

2015-01-11 Thread Quincey Morris
On Jan 11, 2015, at 15:07 , Uli Kusterer wrote: > > Short caveat: Do not get the actual OpenSSL. Get LibreSSL Jumping to a new thread here, since I’m going OT for the original thread. But I have an actual question at the end. I wondered about this issue just yesterday, looking at the open sour

Re: licence key validation method

2015-01-11 Thread Uli Kusterer
On 11 Jan 2015, at 21:59, Charles Srstka wrote: > IMO, it’s better to just static-link OpenSSL into the app and use that. Short caveat: Do not get the actual OpenSSL. Get LibreSSL, which is a fork of OpenSSL done by the OpenBSD folks (i.e. people who actually know security) done after all the

Re: licence key validation method

2015-01-11 Thread Jens Alfke
> On Jan 11, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Charles Srstka wrote: > > IMO, it’s better to just static-link OpenSSL into the app and use that. Kind of big, though! libSodium* (based on NaCl) is a much smaller crypto library, which also has the benefit that it uses an elliptic-key algorithm, Curve25519, wh

Re: licence key validation method

2015-01-11 Thread Charles Srstka
On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Jens Alfke wrote: > >> On Jan 10, 2015, at 10:34 PM, 2551 <2551p...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> Yes, that's precisely what I'm looking for and don't seem able to find. Can >> anyone suggest one? I've been all over stackexchange etc, and t

Re: licence key validation method

2015-01-11 Thread Jens Alfke
> On Jan 10, 2015, at 10:34 PM, 2551 <2551p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, that's precisely what I'm looking for and don't seem able to find. Can > anyone suggest one? I've been all over stackexchange etc, and there seems to > be a lot of confusion out there (or, rather, the more I read, the mor

Re: Mouse tracking under a transparent view still working

2015-01-11 Thread Navneet Kumar
Hi, Implemented tracking area in the transparent view, still the under view's button shows hovering. It seems complicated after reading: http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/cocoa/19-the-nstrackingarea-report.html

Re: Mouse tracking under a transparent view still working

2015-01-11 Thread Markus Spoettl
On 11/01/15 07:12, Navneet Kumar wrote: So the mouse click etc are not passing through, but the hover button under it still shows hovering effect by drawing the border. You probably need to establish a tracking area on the view that is supposed to absorb the mouse events. The reason is that -mo