Hi all,
I am working on making my application carbon free. I could not find any
replacement for the API "GetApplicationTextEncoding" probably because this
API has not been marked as deprecated yet. Because of this API I need to
link with the carbon framework which I don't want. Can you please sugge
Le 21 nov. 08 à 10:42, spsaxena a écrit :
Hi all,
I am working on making my application carbon free. I could not find
any
replacement for the API "GetApplicationTextEncoding" probably
because this
API has not been marked as deprecated yet. Because of this API I
need to
link with the carbo
As per my understanding Carbon framework will be deprecated or completely
removed in future versions of OSX. Well that's the only reason I wish to
remove the carbon framework from my application now.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Le 21 nov. 08 à
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:14 AM, spsaxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As per my understanding Carbon framework will be deprecated or completely
> removed in future versions of OSX. Well that's the only reason I wish to
> remove the carbon framework from my application now.
Not all of Carbon is "d
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:42 AM, spsaxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am working on making my application carbon free. I could not find any
> replacement for the API "GetApplicationTextEncoding" probably because this
> API has not been marked as deprecated yet. Because of this API I ne
Hi,
Mike's comment is right on.
The sole purpose of GetApplicationTextEncoding() is to provide
functional compatibility with OS 9-era localization resources such as
STR#.
There really shouldn't be any need to make your app rely on the single
script approach even for a modern CFString-based
And if you really, really need to access legacy Mac OS 9 text files,
the correct encoding to use is CFStringGetSystemEncoding(), which is
in CoreFoundation.
GetApplicationTextEncoding(): legacy encoding (if any) corresponding
to the language *the app is running in*. As Aki says, it's for
Thanks all for your reply. I would like to go with your suggestion of
removing it.
S!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Michael Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:42 AM, spsaxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am working on making my application carbon free. I
