Re: Outlets / IBOutlet declarations (was Re: InterfaceBuilder &Wiring Objects)

2008-11-19 Thread j o a r
On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Jeff Laing wrote: Well, that's sort of my point, really. I don't *know* what happens inside the *synthesized* code, the only thing I can do is look to Apple who do and what they've said in the past is "don't do it". Not "its not safe". So I don't think I can ma

RE: Outlets / IBOutlet declarations (was Re: InterfaceBuilder &Wiring Objects)

2008-11-19 Thread Jeff Laing
> From: Roland King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I think if you're talking about your own instance variables which you > are declaring and synthesizing, you have enough information to decide > if it's safe to call your property accessors in dealloc or not. Well, that's sort of my point, really. I d

Re: Outlets / IBOutlet declarations (was Re: InterfaceBuilder &Wiring Objects)

2008-11-19 Thread Roland King
Jeff Laing wrote: There's no difference between setting through a property, and setting through a plain old setter method. That said, it's up to you to decide if you want to go with the official recommendation or not. If you think that you have enough control over the implementation of your acce

RE: Outlets / IBOutlet declarations (was Re: InterfaceBuilder &Wiring Objects)

2008-11-19 Thread Jeff Laing
> There's no difference between setting through a property, and setting > through a plain old setter method. That said, it's up to you to decide > if you want to go with the official recommendation or not. If you > think that you have enough control over the implementation of your > accessor method