I've been working on a project for a few weeks now and suddenly today
I get this error while building (see below). I was getting this same
error in one of my real classes so after commenting out almost every
bit of code and still seeing the error, I decided to just create a new
TestClass
you forgot the break;
On 17-Apr-08, at 3:47 PM, Don Arnel wrote:
I've been working on a project for a few weeks now and suddenly
today I get this error while building (see below). I was getting
this same error in one of my real classes so after commenting out
almost every bit of code and
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Don Arnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
switch (1) {
default:
}
(x)(error: label at end of compound statement)
You need a statement to execute for the default case. The code you
have written is equivalent to:
-
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Don Arnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on a project for a few weeks now and suddenly today I get
this error while building (see below). I was getting this same error in one
of my real classes so after commenting out almost every bit of code and
on 4/17/08 4:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] purportedly said:
A break; is not required, but it does cause the compound statement
error to go away. Even with the break; inserted the other error still
occurs if the comments are removed.
On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Robert Kukuchka wrote:
you
The break isn't required, but something is. You could put
NSLog(@defaulting); after default:. Or you could put a semicolon; or
a lovely set of empty braces.
To fix the other problem, try this:
switch (1) {
case 1:
{
NSMutableArray *myArray=[[NSMutableArray
Change it to:
- (void)TestFunction
{
switch (1) {
case 1:
{
NSMutableArray *myArray=[[NSMutableArray alloc]
init];
break;
}
}
}
No need to declare
Ah, that did the trick! I love mailing lists!
Many thanks to all who responded.
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:15 PM, Michael Vannorsdel wrote:
Change it to:
- (void)TestFunction
{
switch (1) {
case 1:
{
NSMutableArray
GCC is alerting you to the fact that the switch at the end of the
statement is unnecessary. If you really want to do something for all
cases, use default. Otherwise just omit it. Using the empty
statement (; by itself) will fool GCC, but an empty default case is
useless.
--Kyle Sluder
On 18/04/2008, at 9:54 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
GCC is alerting you to the fact that the switch at the end of the
statement is unnecessary.
That's not what GCC is trying to do; GCC is trying to alert you to the
fact that it's invalid syntax. As I just said in my earlier e-mail,
labels must
10 matches
Mail list logo
