i18n and xmlform action

2002-12-08 Thread Hong Gia Dinh
Title: i18n and xmlform action Hi all i think i did stupid thing! i tried to apply i18n into my xmlforms but it can not understand the messages in the directory , it can not change into other language because in the link changing language (the bold lines), i am not sure and i dont know if i

Re: Changes made to flow system.js

2002-12-08 Thread Christopher Oliver
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Miles Elam wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Look at what sendPageAndWait() is supposed to do: 1) create the continuation object 2) store it someplace 3) get its id 4) invoque the sitemap with the required URI 5) pass the invocation parameters and the continuatio

Re: Changes made to flow system.js

2002-12-08 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Miles Elam wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: No, because there is a state-preserving channel (a connection) between you and the database. On the web or any other REST-architected networks, we don't. The Cocoon developers don't, but the script developer *does*. The Cocoon developers have imp

Re: Changes made to flow system.js

2002-12-08 Thread Miles Elam
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: No, because there is a state-preserving channel (a connection) between you and the database. On the web or any other REST-architected networks, we don't. The Cocoon developers don't, but the script developer *does*. The Cocoon developers have implemented it. The fa

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Ivelin Ivanov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Only one thing: why it's great to have somebody playing devil's advocate and somebody else excited about something new, let's not forget that we *all* are working in the same team and for the same di

Re: [Proposal] JS Flow vs Actions [was: Implementing XMLForm with Flow]

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
- Original Message - From: "Christopher Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 1:19 PM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow > Uh, how useful is it to insist that something be fully implemented to > prove a point in a discussi

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
This is actually a good example. For fairness sake, I haven't seen many J2EE applications which forward to login from different spots though. J2EE containers usually take care of login and return to original URL. Ivelin - Original Message - From: "Christopher Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
- Original Message - From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Only one thing: why it's great to have somebody playing devil's advocate > and somebody else excited about something new, let's not forget that we > *all* are working in the same team and for the same direction. I am t

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Christopher Oliver
Hi Ivelin, Ivelin Ivanov wrote: I have nothing new to add, but would like to balance the discussion with a reminder: - Original Message - From: "Ovidiu Predescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Implementing X

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Christopher Oliver
Uh, how useful is it to insist that something be fully implemented to prove a point in a discussion on a mailing list? The purpose of my example was to show that the flow layer allows you to avoid the state-machine code required in XMLForm actions (which is what you questioned in your original

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Ivelin Ivanov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ovidiu Predescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Check out Christopher's implementation using the control flow: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103923083624699&w=2 Good attempt, although unfinished. I already described its shortc

[Q]2.1 doesn't build javadocs on w2k

2002-12-08 Thread Ken C
Hi everyone,     I found the current cvs build dec 8 doesn't build javadocs; both the javadocs and api folder are empty although it says build successful. Some of the error message is as follows,     [javadoc] javadoc: Close body tag missing from HTML file org\apache\commons\httpclient\package.htm

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
- Original Message - From: "Ovidiu Predescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Check out Christopher's implementation using the control flow: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103923083624699&w=2 Good attempt, although unfinished. I already described its shortcomings. Bottom

Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
I have nothing new to add, but would like to balance the discussion with a reminder: - Original Message - From: "Ovidiu Predescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Implementing XMLForm with Flow > Brilliant exa

Re: [Austin XML Group] Looking for up to date Presentation

2002-12-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
Thanks for the pointer. - Original Message - From: "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://outerthought.net/gettogether/ is the material that was sent to > the printer for the Cocoon GetTogether. Please check with the original > authors whether they have no objections against re

Re: Flow debugger support checked in

2002-12-08 Thread Ross Gardler
Christopher Oliver wrote: After you get it running, here's a link to some documentation for using it: http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/debugger.html. Regards, Chris Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Marcus Crafter wrote: Hi All, Hope all is well. I've just checked-in support for using the