Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-28 Thread giacomo
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > > > > > > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > > > > It depend of LogKit. > > > [snip] > > > > > > Well, I assumed - since Loggable got

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-28 Thread Torsten Curdt
> > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > > > > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > > > It depend of LogKit. > > [snip] > > > > > Well, I assumed - since Loggable got deprecated... (I thought _you_ > > > > > would be the

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-22 Thread giacomo
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > > > I volunteer to do it... > > > > > > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > > It depend of LogKit. > [snip] > > > > Well, I assume

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-22 Thread giacomo
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Eung-ju Park wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "giacomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled > > > > On Fri, 21

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-22 Thread Torsten Curdt
> > > > > I volunteer to do it... > > > > > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > LogKitManager itself is LogEnabled. but It manage org.apache.log.Logger. > It depend of LogKit. [snip] > > > Well, I assumed - since Loggable got deprecated... (I thought _you_ > > >

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-21 Thread Eung-ju Park
- Original Message - From: "giacomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled > On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, giacom

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-21 Thread giacomo
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, giacomo wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > > > > > a) only HEAD > > > b) HEAD and 2.0 > > > > > > I volunteer to do it... > > > > Is the LOgKitManagement

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-21 Thread Torsten Curdt
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, giacomo wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > > > a) only HEAD > > b) HEAD and 2.0 > > > > I volunteer to do it... > > Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? > > Giacomo Well, I assum

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread giacomo
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > a) only HEAD > b) HEAD and 2.0 > > I volunteer to do it... Is the LOgKitManagement able to handle LogEnabled components? Giacomo -

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Berin Loritsch
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Torsten Curdt wrote: > >>So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? >> >>a) only HEAD >>b) HEAD and 2.0 >> >> > I think we should forget the 2.0 branch as soon as possible, so > changing a) is sufficient. > > Before we vote on it, can you identify what really has t

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Peter Donald
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:35, Torsten Curdt wrote: > avalon-dev: Can someone please explain why Logger has moved? > This is giving me some real headaches with the cocoon > integration - since cocoon still uses Loggable with > the different Logger. It wasn't "moved" - it is a new class completely. Th

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Berin Loritsch
Torsten Curdt wrote: > I want to upgrade our cocoon components to use LogEnabled > instead of Loggable. Most of them extend AbstractLoggable, > so this is no big deal. But some _implement_ Loggable. > > Well, I thought "no big deal either". I changed them to > implement LogEnabled and renamed th

RE: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > > > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > > > > > a) only HEAD > > > b) HEAD and 2.0 > > > > > I think we should forget the 2.0 branch as soon as possible, so > > changing a) is

RE: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > > > a) only HEAD > > b) HEAD and 2.0 > > > I think we should forget the 2.0 branch as soon as possible, so > changing a) is sufficient. That's what I thought, too > Bef

RE: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: > > So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? > > a) only HEAD > b) HEAD and 2.0 > I think we should forget the 2.0 branch as soon as possible, so changing a) is sufficient. Before we vote on it, can you identify what really has to be changed? >From my memory there

Re: [VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
So should we upgrade cocoon to LogEnabled? a) only HEAD b) HEAD and 2.0 I volunteer to do it... -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] upgrading to LogEnabled

2001-12-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
I want to upgrade our cocoon components to use LogEnabled instead of Loggable. Most of them extend AbstractLoggable, so this is no big deal. But some _implement_ Loggable. Well, I thought "no big deal either". I changed them to implement LogEnabled and renamed the setLogger() method to enableLogg