gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 09:20 US/Pacific, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
Many thanks to Michael Melhem for his excellent work coming up with
the algorithm for expiring continuations and for implementing it! The
tests on my machine show the code w
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Reso
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 09:20 US/Pacific, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
Many thanks to Michael Melhem for his excellent work coming up with
the algorithm for expiring continuations and for implementing it! The
tests on my machine show the code works fine, so I checked i
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
Many thanks to Michael Melhem for his excellent work coming up with the
algorithm for expiring continuations and for implementing it! The tests
on my machine show the code works fine, so I checked it in CVS. Thanks!
I've also made some minor change to the control flow eng
Many thanks to Michael Melhem for his excellent work coming up with the
algorithm for expiring continuations and for implementing it! The tests
on my machine show the code works fine, so I checked it in CVS. Thanks!
I've also made some minor change to the control flow engine. When a
request is
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comment
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-17 18:46
---
> I think the runtime complexity of the code can be substantially lowered if we
> assume that all the continuations have the same expiration period, which
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-17 08:27 ---
Excellent work, Michael, thanks!
I think the runtime complexity of the code can be substantially lowered if we
assume that all the continuations have the same expi
;
> On Monday, Dec 16, 2002, at 04:46 US/Pacific, Michael Melhem wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >FYI, bugzilla Patch [Bug 1538] implements "Expire Continuations" using
> >the cornerstone scheduler to periodically (as defined in the xconf)
> >clean
> &
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
st regards,
Ovidiu
On Monday, Dec 16, 2002, at 04:46 US/Pacific, Michael Melhem wrote:
Hi all,
FYI, bugzilla Patch [Bug 1538] implements "Expire Continuations" using
the cornerstone scheduler to periodically (as defined in the xconf)
clean
up expired flow continuations.
I decided to
Hi all,
FYI, bugzilla Patch [Bug 1538] implements "Expire Continuations" using
the cornerstone scheduler to periodically (as defined in the xconf) clean
up expired flow continuations.
I decided to use the cornerstone-scheduler because the avalon-monitor was
not appropriate, and I wante
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-13 17:32
---
Created an attachment (id=4167)
tgz file containing the new jars and files needed for the expire-continuations
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-13 17:30
---
Created an attachment (id=4166)
Patch diff file containing the changes need to implement Expire Continu
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15368
[PATCH] Expire Continuations
Summary: [PATCH] Expire Continuations
Product: Cocoon 2
Version: Current CVS
Platform: All
URL: http://
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
ific, Michael Melhem wrote:
>
> >Hi Ovidiu!!
> >
> >How are you mate, I guess you are not coming to the Frankfurt
> >Stammtisch :-P
>
> Wait a second, I want to come! ;)
Dont worry, we wont start eating until you arrive ;)
>
> >I was thinking
I was thinking about how to Expire Continuations and have come up with
the following:
We know from the "bus discussion" that placing every wk
(WebContinuation)
into the "expirations" Sorted TreeSet is a problematic solution. So how
about placing only the "leaf" nodes
Hi Ovidiu!!
How are you mate, I guess you are not coming to the Frankfurt
Stammtisch :-P
I was thinking about how to Expire Continuations and have come up with
the following:
We know from the "bus discussion" that placing every wk (WebContinuation)
into the "expirations"
Hi ReinHard,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:53:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I read
> [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103588507614819&w=2] that you are
>interested in implementing a background thread that removes
> all continuations which are not accessed w
Hi Michael,
I read
[http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103588507614819&w=2] that you are
interested in implementing a background thread that removes
all continuations which are not accessed within a certain period of time. Did
you already start with your efforts? Maybe I can support
21 matches
Mail list logo
