Horst Rutter wrote:
>Do we have a way to read in XML directly from SQL Server 2000?
>That would be really cool and a performance booster, because
>there is no need for a SQL to XML transformation.
>I guess this also means one has to workaround JDBC for this.
>Anybody has a clue what it would tak
re.de/English/Produkte/JDBC_Overview/ms.htm
>
>Horst
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Stephen Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:10 PM
>Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
>
>
>
>I'm using SQL
, 2002 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Generator for SQL Server
My point is we could avoid the conversion of SQL result rows into XML in
Cocoon alltogether
if we query SQL Server for an XML result document, which is one of the
features of SQL Server 2000.
There is no JDBC involved.
I
://www.inetsoftware.de/English/Produkte/JDBC_Overview/ms.htm
Horst
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
I'm using SQL Server and would
s off-topic, but I'm tuning my Cocoon app and am very
interested in any improvement I can get.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Gene
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
>
>
> Oh!
>
> I'm using the MS JDBC Drivers. If I have to use SQL Server, is there
> another set of drivers I could use instead that would be faster?
>
> Steve
>
> > -Original Message-
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Generator for SQL Server
>
>
> Just a note on SQL Server: the Microsoft drivers really suck,
> and the performance is dismal. Changing drivers would help anyway.
>
> There is a link to a performance comparison between db in the
> arc
May 29, 2002 12:10 AM
Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
I'm using SQL Server and would be interested a performance boost too,
but, relative to all the other stuff going on, is the JDBC overhead
significant?
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Horst Rutter [mailto:[EMAIL PR
I'm using SQL Server and would be interested a performance boost too,
but, relative to all the other stuff going on, is the JDBC overhead
significant?
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Horst Rutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
