On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:31 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:32 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I suggest linking to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly
but
I guess that's your intention ;-)
Yes, but at that point we'll have to re-build the site once
On 11/3/03 7:32, Reinhard Pötz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/3/03 7:42, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Let's get the nightly build working asap
Carsten, are you talking about the nightly builds (GUMP) or
the nightly CVS
That is the only occurrence of the word xml-cocoon2 on the
server, all other problems are client-cache related...
I checked it again and now the link is correct. Probably a proxy server
issue because client caching is turned off in all my browsers.
Reinhard
Ok, it's working here as well, but shouldn't the links go
to cocoon-2.1?
Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Snapshot links at Cocoon website
That is the only
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, it's working here as well, but shouldn't the links go
to cocoon-2.1?
Good question ... I would link to
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly but this would need a
rebuild of the complete site (as Pier pointed out).
But maybe this
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 05:32 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I suggest linking to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/mirror.cgi#nightly
but
I guess that's your intention ;-)
Yes, but at that point we'll have to re-build the site once again...
Ok, we shouldn't be so limited in rebuilding the site
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 07:31:10AM -0500, Diana Shannon wrote:
snip/
3. I was really excited about Forrest transition, thinking the
automation would save me all of the above time which I could devote to
docs content. Unfortunately:
- only a few committers participated in the trial run, so it
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
which is what is used to generate the web
Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Diana Shannon wrote:
1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
Diana Shannon wrote:
2. Updating the live site repository is time consuming, at least for me,
on a slow dial-up connection (I live in a rural area of the US with no
broadband option). The api docs directory is the time killer here. I
spent eight hours, one night, simply performing a cvs update
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/3/03 7:42, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Let's get the nightly build working asap
Carsten, are you talking about the nightly builds (GUMP) or
the nightly CVS snapshots???
Because if the latter, I was just waiting
11 matches
Mail list logo
