Torsten Curdt wrote:
> ...well, could you really think of more? If I look into our sitemaps those are
> the most widely used ones. All other would be regexpr / wildcard.
>
> I don't think it's that bad... If I can really save that amount of per-request
> processing time - I would go for it!
I w
> > btw: do we already have an "always" matcher?
> > due to the lastest performance analysis we should better
> > substitute
> >
> > or
> >
> > with
> >
> >
>
> Well, you might end up with Matchers like
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> for performance reasons and the numbers of Matchers will expona
