- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: New release 2.0.1 woes. Continue.
> > From: Alexander Smirnoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> &g
XSP machinery between these two versions.
Vadim
>
> Alex.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:04 PM
> Subject: RE: New re
pared with 2rc1 is
significally slower for more or less complicated XSP.
Alex.
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: New release 2.0.1 woes. Continue.
&
> From: Alexander Smirnoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Sorry for misleading about the "global" method, - it works fine.
>
> The problem actually is different:
>
> If I put "return" between open and close tags it results in empty
document.
> Look at example:
>
> http://apache.org/xsp";>
>
true)
return;
Quite important feature I would say.
Alex.
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: New release 2.0.1 woes. Continue.
>
Send in simple test file, couple of lines.
Vadim
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Smirnoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: New release 2.0.1 woes. Continue.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm
Hi,
I'm stuck big time with integration of new 2.0.1 release with my old 2rc1
server implementation. I had some problems with sitemap, but with the
help of Vadim I've got it more or less working. Thanks. Now problem
arised with xsp files...
It appears that if you put "global" method in your XSP
