Robert,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm working on a project prototype where I'm trying
I believe that XMLForms are accessed by the pipeline via an Action
Component, based on AbstractXMLFormAction. This is the Component that can
& would handle most of what you are saying below. The Action taken by the
Action will depend on the command encoded in the request; one could, at
the end of
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> My only point here is that the message is somewhat misleading. The
>
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:35 AM
> Subject: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
>
> >
> >
velin
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> I believe that XMLForms are accessed by the pipeline vi
I've just begun looking at XMLForms, and I wonder if this makes any sense:
When the client posts the XForm, we can start with a completely empty DOM
which is filled in according to the XPath expressions in the XForm.
This DOM starts a pipeline as, say, a PostedXFormGenerator.
Then, there could
Thank you,
Ivelin
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Schram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
> I've just begun looking at XMLForms, and I wonder if this ma
> I'm working on a project prototype where I'm trying to implement a kind of
> "wizard" using XMLForms. The difference is that I'd like the XML docs
> written by the content people to define the resulting XML doc, without
> specifying it ahead of time. In other words, I'd like the elements &
> att