Re: Question on extending AbstractAction

2002-04-10 Thread Peter Royal
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 01:18 pm, Nick Airey wrote: > * Not defining a lifestyle at all means that an instance will be > created, used, and destroyed every time it is needed. This is probably > not very efficient. oh not probably, its not very efficient at all :) -pete -- peter royal -> [EMA

RE: Question on extending AbstractAction

2002-04-10 Thread Nick Airey
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 17:32, Nick Airey wrote: > On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 16:31, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > From: Nick Airey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > So does anyone have any ideas why say AbstractAction isn't poolable? > > Ok, for those interested in the answer, I'll summari

RE: Question on extending AbstractAction

2002-04-10 Thread Nick Airey
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 16:31, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Nick Airey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have written some action classes, extending class > > org.apache.cocoon.acting.AbstractAction and implementing the act() > > method. They're working fine. >

RE: Question on extending AbstractAction

2002-04-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Nick Airey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Hello everyone, > > I have written some action classes, extending class > org.apache.cocoon.acting.AbstractAction and implementing the act() > method. They're working fine. > > > My questions refer to the Cocoon 2.0.2 release. > > > Questi