Hi all,
This is just a reminder that the registration for the Code4Lib
conference begins tomorrow (Wed.) at 1 PM EST. If you'd like to
bookmark it, the registration page is up now at:
http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/C4L2010registration
This page contains a link to the registration form
One of the things that comes to mind is the need to distinguish between various
kinds of VoIP. By way of example, I'm currently using two VoIP systems in my
office. One is my desk phone -- a cisco-supplied IP Phone that is in effect
indistinguishable from my previous hard line phone. The
The University of Rochester is pleased to announce the 1.0 production
version of its new open source institutional repository software
platform, IR+. The University has been running IR+ in production since
August 2009.
The download can be found here:
Looks very nice. Congrats!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Sarr, Nathan
ns...@library.rochester.eduwrote:
The University of Rochester is pleased to announce the 1.0 production
version of its new open source institutional repository software
platform, IR+. The University has been running
Hi Eric and Brad,
Thanks very much for the positive comments.
We did notice that some of the URLs on the email wrapped. If anyone would
like to get a list in tiny URL format, please feel free to contact me.
Thanks again,
-Nate
Nathan Sarr
Senior Software Engineer
River Campus
Nathan,
Can you summarize how the IR+ software is different than other major
institutional repository software? I'm not directly involved with a
repository and so my understanding of the scope of these products lacks
detail. Where does IR+ fit into the big picture?
Thanks,
Mike Beccaria
Systems
I would appreciate that too. And if you want to write an article for the
Code4Lib Journal on how it differs from other IR software, why you did
it, and how you did it, it would be welcome. :)
Jonathan
Michael Beccaria wrote:
Nathan,
Can you summarize how the IR+ software is different than
+1 that suggestion!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I would appreciate that too. And if you want to write an article for the
Code4Lib Journal on how it differs from other IR software, why you did it,
and how you did it, it would be welcome. :)
Hi Mike,
When we designed IR+ we incorporated User Research into the requirements and
design processes of the system.
We found that we had a very hard time convincing our users to use our
Institutional Repository because it did not seem to meet many of their needs.
So we did two major
