Ah, yep. I've never done a full rant about Drupal because it would take days
and run into many virtual pages. I gave it a good go, almost full time, for a
couple of years, even went to a regional conference.
It's a train wreck beyond that first easy 80% – especially if you care about
detail – b
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Stuart
Yeates
Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2014 1:31 p.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] statistics for image sharing sites?
On 05/14/2014 01:23 PM, Barnes, Hugh wrote
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Stuart
Yeates
Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2014 1:04 p.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] statistics for image sharing sites?
[snip]
> My secondary question is whether any httpd gurus h
Point of logic: the fact that you (or others) find them useful is orthogonal to
whether they should be from the same source.
That was the original question. No, wait, it was about discussing (discussing)
whether they should be together :)
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mai
Take back my distinction between job postings and discussion!
By extension, shall we say that if they are posted here, they are fair game for
ridicule, expressing interest, +1, and other kinds of comment?
(For clarity, the tone of this email is: possibly provocative, not entirely
serious)
It's not conversation though, it's more like broadcast. Surely I don't have to
explain on this particular list why this channel is not the perfect broadcast
outlet.
Further, it's quite distinct "subject" matter.
Let me not generalise about librarians, but don't these ideas resonate?:
* separat
And vegetarians, and Mormons, and folks who never met Roy :)
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Riley
Childs
Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2014 4:28 p.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Welcome to Roy4Lib
Just a re
Roy must be quite the guy, love to meet him.
D'ya think this thread has maybe passed it's useful-by date?
Constructive suggestion: take it onto Twitter, where I am not, with a hashtag
... ??
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Fo
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe
Hourcle
>> (They are on Wikipedia so they must be real.)
> Wikipedia was the first place you looked? Not IETF or W3C?
> No wonder people say libraries are doomed, if even people who work in
>
+1 to all of Richard's points here. Making something easier for you to develop
is no justification for making it harder to consume or deviating from well
supported standards.
[Robert]
> You can't
> just put a file in the file system, unlike with separate URIs for
> distinct representations wh
RV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] calibr: a simple opening hours calendar
Hugh,
Thanks for sharing. A quick question. If a library opens past midnight, does
that count more than one opening a day or no?
~Bohyun
On Nov 26, 2013, at 5:04 PM, "Barnes, Hugh" wrote:
> Hi folks
>
&
Hi folks
I took a calendar script posted to this list by Andrew Darby some time ago and
made some changes. I don't think there is any of Andrew's code left, so I've
rebranded it with an acknowledgement. (If I had my time again, I might have
coded it from scratch rather than built it over Andrew
4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Barnes,
Hugh
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 10:27 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Tool for managing subscription content metadata
Hi
An exercise we've just been through (don't ask!) has revealed a dire need to
track informat
Hi
An exercise we've just been through (don't ask!) has revealed a dire need to
track information about subscription service vendors (e.g. serials, databases,
e-book publishers) in a better way than Office documents. I am looking for a
tool, ideally one to rule them all. Throwing it out here.
For RNG, as long as your schema is reachable and referenced correctly, it looks
like this should work: http://validator.nu . Please let us know how you find it.
Nothing known or found in a quick scan for Schematron.
Somewhat surprised at the apparent lack of options.
Cheers
Hugh Barnes
Digital
15 matches
Mail list logo
