On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Dan Scott wrote:
> Oh dear $deity:
>
> Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to
> universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an
> extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each
> individual subscriber can set the repl
It's slow but you should be able to change your settings here, once
you have a password:
http://listserv.nd.edu/
It's actually been too slow once I get to a list for me to confirm.
Eby
On 4/2/07, Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh dear $deity:
Given the impossibility of elevating one pe
Oh dear $deity:
Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to
universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an
extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each
individual subscriber can set the reply-to behaviour to match their own
desired behavio
> On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
>>
>>> Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there
>>> you go.
>>
>> /me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
>
> -1 - replies should go to lists. :) i know,
ivity...
*snarky on*
So, when did this list turn into web4lib?
*snarky off*
-- jaf
- Original Message -
From: Code for Libraries
To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
Sent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access
&
ent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource
Access & Management Services)
-0
There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and
they are both equally boring.
//Ed
/me withdraws his vote and recasts it for the great state of
KeepEdsuNotBored!
+1 for both of these comments.
-Original Message-
From: Walter Lewis
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:49 PM
Ed Summers wrote:
> ...and they are both equally boring.
edsu++
Walter
who has managed to screw up no matter what the list settings
On 3/30/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
not true. click on the From and "Reply to Sender".
And even without that, you have copy/paste, the great equalizer. Consider
it a minor penalty for moving a public discussion into a private space.
-Mike
Ed Summers wrote:
There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and
they are both equally boring.
edsu++
Walter
who has managed to screw up no matter what the list settings
-0
There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and
they are both equally boring.
//Ed
I wouldn't say harmful, unless you send sensitive information without
checking. At that point I think it's actually email that's harmful, or
anything without an undo. Neither option is ideal as someone will
likely have to change who they are sending to at least some of the
time. However, I think c
On Mar 30, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 30, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely
unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for
example
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
bah!re
On 3/30/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 - replies should go to lists. :)
-1 to changing list behavior, +1 to Erik's comment.
-Mike
On Mar 30, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely
unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for
example
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
bah!reply-all sucks, it ends up duplicating mails unless
The problem of course is broken email clients lacking features. Hey, most email
lists these days send messages out with a "list-id" header that would allow my
email client to have a "Reply to list" function, as well as "Reply to Sender",
and "Reply to all", all of which could function independen
It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely
unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for
example
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Besides, not all email clients have a reply-to-sender feature (mine -
Apple Mail - for example doesn't), but pra
/me votes to drop this list in Google Groups...
-n
On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
turning_off_reply-to_munging_on_this_list--
--
Eric "List Owner" Morgan
turning_off_reply-to_munging_on_this_list--
--
Eric "List Owner" Morgan
On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there
you go.
/me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
-1 - replies should go to lists. :) i know, i know, its a very
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote:
Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there you go.
/me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.
21 matches
Mail list logo
