Re: [Coder-Com] permanent channel creation

2002-12-05 Thread Fre
- Original Message - From: "Sofie Van Tendeloo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Coder-com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] permanent channel creation > What do you exactly mean with: 'move X off the channel?' > It not being on the channel

Re: [Coder-Com] permanent channel creation

2002-12-05 Thread Sofie Van Tendeloo
What do you exactly mean with: 'move X off the channel?' - Original Message - From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 5:09 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] perma

Re: [Coder-Com] Question

2002-12-05 Thread daaave
* Chris Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-05 17:13:04 +]: > I susspect it means diff -rC3: > > recursive > context > 3 lines of copied text. > > I personaly hate context diffs... Well, if that's the case, you guys are not working on a good track record her

Re: [Coder-Com] Question

2002-12-05 Thread Kev
> this patch if you like. I couldn't find any "patch submission > guidelines" on the coder-com web site, except this: > > # A patch must be submitted with a separate description section that > # include standard header fields, and the actual patch should be in > # "diff-rc3" format. > > I have

Re: [Coder-Com] Question

2002-12-05 Thread Chris Crowther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 05 December 2002 13:31, daaave wrote: > # "diff-rc3" format. I susspect it means diff -rC3: recursive context 3 lines of copied text. I personaly hate context diffs... - -- hikari [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Coder-Com] Question

2002-12-05 Thread Chris Crowther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 05 December 2002 13:31, daaave wrote: > anything about "rc3" so... But, the entire thing is only 3 lines, > really it takes just as long to simply type in the changes manually as > it does to apply the patch. ;) Speaking personal

Re: [Coder-Com] Question

2002-12-05 Thread daaave
* Tom Rons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-04 21:12:51 +0100]: > Hmm, you have a point there. Depending on how it is interpreted by the > person installing it, it may well look like a failure to run as root. > I too think it would be a good idea to change it. Well, I was going to make this change,