On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
> I don't think we have to implement the encryption in ircu directly,
> however: if instead we provide a means for ircu to load an external
> module of some sort that wraps connections—think in terms of link
> compression, for instance—I be
Guys, thank you, but due to Michaels hostility towards non Amercians who
enjoy their privacy, and with no chance of SSL in ircu, we took our vote a
few hours ago, and at UTC changed ircd's
Noel: I know for a fact that Mirc has SSL enabled, as does ChatZilla, one
of our admins has said there is
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:24:36AM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2013 2:30 AM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:15 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The only thing that US law has to do with anything is that the US --like
> 40 other countries, including
> >>
> > Complied with by a simple notice on ftp servers, and, funnily
> enough, inside the package you need to open and read before building,
> when was the last time you saw such a notice before downloading httpd,
> or postfix etc
>
> I can't say for sure how the law is interpreted in Australia,
On Jul 22, 2013 2:30 AM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:15 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
>
>>
>> The only thing that US law has to do with anything is that the US --like
40 other countries, including
>> most of those already mentioned has implemented export controls under
the Wass
