Re: [Coder-Com] Ircu2.10.11 and date -s

2002-12-07 Thread Kev
> The latest ircu is having a strange behaviour when the root uses date -s to > set a new time: > After some seconds it drops ALL client- and serverconnections except > operators with a ping timeout. (maybe the cookies expire, but i turned back t > he time > by 1 hour) > Ircu2.10.10 doesn't show s

[Coder-Com] Ircu2.10.11 and date -s

2002-12-07 Thread volta2
The latest ircu is having a strange behaviour when the root uses date -s to set a new time: After some seconds it drops ALL client- and serverconnections except operators with a ping timeout. (maybe the cookies expire, but i turned back the time by 1 hour) Ircu2.10.10 doesn't show such a behaviour

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11

2002-09-19 Thread Kev
> I am using ircu2.10.11 right now. It's great but I have question. Does it > support other language? Now I can use only English. Please advise. The IRC protocol has no way to specify the user's language. English is the only translation of the notices and numeric replies available. Even if some

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11

2002-09-19 Thread net
OTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:03 PM Subject: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 > Dear Sir, > > I am using ircu2.10.11 right now. It's great but I have question. Does it > support other language? Now I can use only English. Please advise. > >

[Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11

2002-09-19 Thread jammy
Dear Sir, I am using ircu2.10.11 right now. It's great but I have question. Does it support other language? Now I can use only English. Please advise. Another thing, Is there any ircservices supported on this version? I try to use ircservices version 39 but it doesn't support. [Sep 18 22:40:52

[Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11.beta51 - possible release candidate

2002-07-11 Thread Kev
Greetings. I consider beta51 a possible release candidate. All u2.10.11 servers currently linked to Undernet have been updated to it. If you see it doing anything you think even might be a bug, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] describing every detail you have, including what server you we

[Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 in chroot jail

2002-04-17 Thread bisou517
I'm attempting to run ircd (ircu2.10.11beta27) in a chroot jail. I compiled statically with no errors. However, the server only works if the ircd binary is in /bin (outside the jail) rather than the new root bin. Which suggests that I may be missing some files in the jail, but there are no errors

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 doesn't resolve hostnames

2002-04-07 Thread mr.volta
Message - >From: "mr.volta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:52 PM >Subject: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 doesn't resolve hostnames > > >| Any idea why my ircu doesn't resolve hostn

[Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 doesn't resolve hostnames

2002-04-07 Thread mr.volta
Any idea why my ircu doesn't resolve hostnames of clients and servers? All other ircds I've run on my machine (also ircu2.10.10) resolve hostnames. I don't run any bind. _ Get email for your site ---> http://www.everyone.net __

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-17 Thread Bas
Braden Temme wrote: > > I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine >people in the > channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: > > A Opped > B Opped > C Opped > > B Voiced > BAAAB Voiced > BAAAC Voiced > > C

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-17 Thread Tom Rons
> I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine people in the > channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: > > A Opped > B Opped > C Opped > > B Voiced > BAAAB Voiced > BAAAC Voiced > > C Nothing > CAAAB Nothing > CAAA

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Braden Temme
I need one more thing then. Lets say we have a hypothetical situation of nine people in the channel. Three have ops, three have voice, and three have no status: A Opped B Opped C Opped B Voiced BAAAB Voiced BAAAC Voiced C Nothing CAAAB Nothing CAAAC Nothing How would thi

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Sikorski
The ':o' modifier is just a flag, to save space/bandwidth it only indicates a change of state. So, if you see a ':o', or ':v' or ':ov' appended to a numeric, the subsequent numerics will also have that state (op'd, etc) applied to them. That is until you encounter another change of state :) C

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Carlo Wood
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 05:58:50PM -0800, Braden Temme wrote: > I think I found a bug. I noticed that when two servers link up they aren't fully >reporting who is > opped in a channel. In fact, its only reporting one person opped in each channel. > > Server Output: > AC B #chatweb 1016220367 +

[Coder-Com] ircu2.10.11 BUG

2002-03-16 Thread Braden Temme
I think I found a bug. I noticed that when two servers link up they aren't fully reporting who is opped in a channel. In fact, its only reporting one person opped in each channel. Server Output: AC B #chatweb 1016220367 +tn AEAAD:o,ACAAn,ACAAm NAMES output: #chatweb @DarkHorse @Knoxville @Bra