Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-08 Thread Richard Smith
As inserted: > From: Valcor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:51 -0500 > To: Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser > > Hello xplora, > > I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Hidden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Valcor
Hello xplora, I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted anything quite as complex as X, or even the ircd, so excuse my questions for appear completely and utterly stupid ;) No offence is intended. My coding experience isn't in this area, but it interests me, so I try to l

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Dave C.
nt: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser > Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and > I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly > monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I a

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Larry Kaeto
- From: "Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the ins

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-05 Thread Richard Smith
Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I am told that X is already being "taxed" to much on login. (although my way around that was simply to add a s

RE: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-22 Thread Casey Boone
if you dont want people using adduser then wouldnt it be easier to just not give them 400+ access? Casey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Coder-Com] a

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Chris Crowther
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote: > P.S. This looks good with times new roman (non proportional) Minor problem there is that some of us use CLI clients; general guideline, formating is a no-no, we like a our plain ordinary boring e-mail. -- Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther [EMAIL

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Alexander Maassen
Oh wait, sorry, you mean where only a certain level can adduser to a channel ? Well, thats possible, in order to make it work a channel would need a new setting called minaddlevel for example, there he could define the minimum level required to adduser (ranging 400 - 500), only a 500 should be abl

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Alexander Maassen
I got that, so do others, coded it ourself, issue is, the command has been rejected by cservice, so just forget about it, it won't be implemented, not even #define'able. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: