klsnreddy opened a new pull request #8983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8983
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
tanjinP commented on issue #8970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8970#issuecomment-632979988
I can take this on as it relates to #8883
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a change to tag nightly-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
*** WARNING: tag nightly-master was modified! ***
from 94a7673 (commit)
to f107338 (commit)
from
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974#discussion_r429505660
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -72,98 +68,90 @@ class VaultBackend(BaseSecretsBackend, LoggingMixin):
:type
kaxil opened a new pull request #8982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8982
Remove defunct code from setup.py
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for
Acehaidrey edited a comment on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632969149
hey @jhtimmins thanks for the update! That is okay with me. I just don't
know how to make this test pass otherwise and @dimberman has asked for it. do
you think we
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632969149
hey @jhtimmins thanks for the update! That is okay with me. I just don't
know how to make this test pass otherwise and @dimberman has asked for it
kaxil opened a new pull request #8981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8981
Remove duplicate line from CONTRIBUTING.rst
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests
jhtimmins commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632960556
@Acehaidrey Not sure about increasing the memory, but several of us are
actively working to reduce the image size to solve that issue. Hard to give an
exact timeline, but can
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632944238
hey @dimberman @ashb I am getting some exit code 137 meaning oom issues.
that is why tests are failing. but wondering if you knew where to touch those
containers to request
Acehaidrey commented on a change in pull request #8598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8598#discussion_r429486073
##
File path: airflow/providers/apache/hive/hooks/hive.py
##
@@ -708,7 +708,11 @@ def _get_max_partition_from_part_specs(part_specs,
partition_key,
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632927893
@dimberman yes I can rebase and try again, it seems the tests are failing to
some connection issue with hive which are not related to this. I'm thinking its
intermittent ?
dimberman commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632926745
@Acehaidrey can you please fix the tests? Will merge when passing.
This is an automated message from the
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632915369
not a problem @jhtimmins I know you are all busy! please let me know if I
can help ever! would love to be closer to community :) but regarding this PR
was there anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114413#comment-17114413
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6569:
-
mikeclarke commented on pull request #7232:
URL:
mikeclarke commented on pull request #7232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7232#issuecomment-632915407
> Can you do rebase to the latest master? I would like to accept these
changes, but I need green tests (excluding quarantine)
Rebased again, thanks.
Acehaidrey edited a comment on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632915369
not a problem @jhtimmins I know you are all busy! please let me know if I
can help ever! would love to be closer to community :) but regarding this PR
was there
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8702#issuecomment-632912320
No problem thank you @dimberman !
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mikaeld opened a new issue #8980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8980
**Description**
airflow.operators.slack_operator only has the SlackAPIPostOperator
implementing 'chat.postMessage' Slack API method. I created an Operator for the
'files.upload' API method for a
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8980#issuecomment-632892218
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
mik-laj opened a new pull request #8979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8979
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [X] Description above provides context of the change
- [X] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
mik-laj opened a new pull request #8978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8978
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [X] Description above provides context of the change
- [X] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #8977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8977#issuecomment-632886031
It seems to me that all files are checked.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/f1073381ed764a218b2502d15ca28a5b326f9f2d/tests/test_project_structure.py#L84
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #8977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8977#issuecomment-632886031
It seems to me that all files are checked.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/f1073381ed764a218b2502d15ca28a5b326f9f2d/tests/test_project_structure.py#L84
mik-laj commented on issue #8977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8977#issuecomment-632886031
It seems to me that all files are checked.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/f1073381ed764a218b2502d15ca28a5b326f9f2d/tests/test_project_structure.py#L84
However, I
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632872285
Updated to just bust cache.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
potiuk opened a new issue #8977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8977
**Description**
The test_project_structure does not check for files that are protocols or
secrets. Only operators/hooks/sensors are checked.
**Use case / motivation**
If there are
potiuk commented on issue #8977:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8977#issuecomment-632866996
cc @mik-laj
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
potiuk opened a new pull request #8976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8976
Breeze had --push-images switch to also push images to repo
but it was often needed to build and push images separately.
We have now a possibility to push an already built image with
dimberman commented on a change in pull request #8777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8777#discussion_r429407770
##
File path: chart/values.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
+# Default values for airflow.
+# This is a YAML-formatted file.
+# Declare variables to be passed
sarahmaas commented on issue #8119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8119#issuecomment-632843330
I'd like to work on adding swagger UI for this.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
schnie commented on a change in pull request #8777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8777#discussion_r429394334
##
File path: chart/values.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
+# Default values for airflow.
+# This is a YAML-formatted file.
+# Declare variables to be passed
schnie commented on a change in pull request #8777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8777#discussion_r429393752
##
File path: chart/templates/configmap.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+
+## Airflow ConfigMap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114288#comment-17114288
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6569:
-
mik-laj commented on pull request #7232:
URL:
mik-laj commented on pull request #7232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7232#issuecomment-632828928
Can you do rebase to the latest master? I would like to accept these
changes, but I need green tests (excluding quarantine)
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #8846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8846#issuecomment-632825269
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
This is an automated message from the
mik-laj merged pull request #8846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8846
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from b055151 Add context to execution_date_fn in ExternalTaskSensor (#8702)
add f107338 Add support for
casassg commented on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632819478
I prefer to avoid doing that. Seems to add quite a bit of code complexity
and I doubt it will impact significantly the user experience. I think it should
be fine from users to
jaketf commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429358908
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -435,20 +435,52 @@ def _get_pipeline(
"workflows",
casassg commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429363622
##
File path: docs/concepts.rst
##
@@ -116,6 +116,47 @@ DAGs can be used as context managers to automatically
assign new operators to th
op.dag
casassg commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429362120
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +148,142 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
casassg commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429339659
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +148,142 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632802828
yeah, I thought this might be deliberate, bit wondered if it was a
pre-commit 1 vs 2 problem.
This is an
aoen commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429349413
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +147,141 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
jaketf commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429345281
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -386,15 +480,29 @@ def start_pipeline(
pipeline_name,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #8975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8975#issuecomment-632788174
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
crazzysun opened a new pull request #8975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8975
Issue #8969
- Create an Airflow operator atlas entity don't use execution date as part
of the qualified name anymore.
- Add config property for enabled/disabled creating missing inlets,
samuelkhtu commented on issue #8525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8525#issuecomment-632786479
Quick update. The PR is under review.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632774494
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/699984569?check_suite_focus=true is
the problem I was dealing with
This is
potiuk commented on pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974#issuecomment-632766569
Hey @ashb @kaxil -> here is the first of the Hooks. This one is implemented
for Vault. I extracted the client out of the Backend and added all the missing
authentication
potiuk opened a new pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632759670
(I'm not sure at all if this is the right fix or not, but thought I'd try it)
This is an automated message from
ashb opened a new pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8972#issuecomment-632754220
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
MichaelJDrK opened a new issue #8972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8972
**Apache Airflow version**:
1.10.10
**What happened**:
Use airflow out of the box, create any DAG, run the DAG.
Log will contain nested log messages like this (one line):
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114144#comment-17114144
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-3819:
-
tylux commented on pull request #4660:
URL:
tylux commented on pull request #4660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4660#issuecomment-632749722
Can this get revisited? This goes against Kubernetes best practices to rely
on a different mechanism i.e dag code to set the resource limits instead of
standard pod limits.
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429307560
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/operators/datafusion.py
##
@@ -674,14 +676,23 @@ def execute(self, context: Dict):
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v1-10-test by this push:
new 17150ae Pin Version of Azure Cosmos to
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429292921
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -386,15 +480,29 @@ def start_pipeline(
pipeline_name,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114118#comment-17114118
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6569:
-
maxcountryman commented on pull request #7232:
URL:
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429236013
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -357,12 +418,45 @@ def list_pipelines(
)
return
maxcountryman commented on pull request #7232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7232#issuecomment-632730483
It seems like the tests that are failing are unrelated to this patch and
seem to be the same tests that are also failing on master.
What's blocking merging this in
dimberman closed pull request #8958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8958
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
dimberman commented on pull request #8702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8702#issuecomment-632705967
Hi @Acehaidrey apologies for the delay. I've merged the PR and will work to
backport it on 1.10.11 :)
This
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9a4a2d1 [AIRFLOW-5262] Update timeout exception to include dag (#8466)
add b055151 Add context to
dimberman merged pull request #8702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8702
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
yerrysherry opened a new issue #8971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8971
$ airflow version
1.10.10
Database:
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core),
Webserver - scheduler:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8971#issuecomment-632701306
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
mik-laj opened a new issue #8970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8970
Hello,
A better guide that describes how to use KubernetesPodOperator would be
useful. This is one of the most frequently used Airflow operators, so many
users have problems with this operator.
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429236013
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -357,12 +418,45 @@ def list_pipelines(
)
return
nodyke opened a new issue #8969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8969
**Description**
As part of data lineage implementation, there is requirement to sending
lineage data from airflow to Apache Atlas. Current module, what represented in
1.10 stable version,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8969#issuecomment-632671185
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
U-Ozdemir commented on issue #8207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8207#issuecomment-632669193
Hello, I have submitted a part of the guide. It can be used by others here
working on it aswell. Any feedback is always welcome.
Best regards,
Ozdemir
U-Ozdemir opened a new pull request #8968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8968
This my first time working with an open source project and I posting here
the first attempt for an ML operator guide. It is still in progress now, but
some feedback is always welcome.
#
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #8968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8968#issuecomment-632661432
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
ashb edited a comment on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632646688
> The main question is: do we want to support that? Is this "hack" worth it,
and do IDEs get massively confused by this?
I think if IDEs support it, and we add tests
ashb commented on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632646688
> The main question is: do we want to support that? Is this "hack" worth it,
and do IDEs get massively confused by this?
I think if IDEs support it, and we add tests for it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ash Berlin-Taylor updated AIRFLOW-3367:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
1.10.11
> Test celery with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113951#comment-17113951
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-3367:
--
Commit
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 229f631f2dafa7a698e634a614c8fa4102f68b38
Author: Joshua Carp
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 3 04:19:25 2018 -0500
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 3f3a4b5e2a0fb256c023d6087026608697f40a2f
Author: Ash Berlin-Taylor
AuthorDate: Tue May 19 13:21:44 2020 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
discard 24b7416 Fix race in Celery tests by pre-creating result tables (#8909)
discard d13c681 [AIRFLOW-3367] Run
ashb closed issue #8967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8967
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ashb commented on issue #8967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8967#issuecomment-632642806
migrations are recorded when they are performed, and are only run once.
It should be impossible for the table to be dropped without also recording
that the migration was deleted.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113950#comment-17113950
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-3367:
--
Commit
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 179fbb6 Cache 1 10 ci images (#8955) (#8959)
new d13c681 [AIRFLOW-3367] Run celery integration test with
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 24b74168afe26500abaf82fd388eccee18611c4e
Author: Ash Berlin-Taylor
AuthorDate: Tue May 19 13:21:44 2020 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit d13c6810674dae4abbc572116852e6b331c9f40e
Author: Joshua Carp
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 3 04:19:25 2018 -0500
ashb commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632634642
Ahha, cool. yes. `git rebase` can be tricky the first thousand times you run
it - I've been there!
Don't worry to much about closed PRs, do what is easiest for you to not
JavierLopezT commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632633845
Hi @ashb, thank you. The only reason is that there is a huge mess with git
and I was thinking about a fresh start. It is explained a little deeper here
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And...
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
ashb commented on pull request #8701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8701#issuecomment-632633027
@VijayantSoni Probably just using `unittest.mock` is enough here, yes please
-- we've done that in a few other places I think
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
ashb commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632632193
Hi @JavierLopezT The screenshot you posted looks like a nice feature -- is
there a reason you closed this PR?
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7335#issuecomment-632631751
Ohhh, yeah, you may be right.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113943#comment-17113943
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6711:
-
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113932#comment-17113932
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4512:
-
psuanm5030 commented on pull request #5288:
URL:
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo