ginolegigot commented on PR #35136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35136#issuecomment-1823990626
Hello @potiuk and @Taragolis!
May i have a review ? Or call someone who can do it ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
potiuk commented on PR #35801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35801#issuecomment-1824049973
Actually - I made it even better (see the latest version). I also figured
how to do it so that we do not have to keep the separate lists of variables to
pass in neither docker-compose ba
hamedhsn commented on PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#issuecomment-1824067974
@bolkedebruin build is green now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
svvema opened a new issue, #35812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35812
### Description
Adding a commented line in compose file like `-
${AIRFLOW_PROJ_DIR:-.}/airflow.cfg:/opt/airflow/airflow.cfg ` would save new
users tons of time when customizing the configuration fi
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #35812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35812#issuecomment-1824107782
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for ap
Taragolis commented on PR #34744:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34744#issuecomment-1824170057
closed in favor of #35798
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
Taragolis closed pull request #34744: Make core compatible with `pendulum` 3
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34744
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
bolkedebruin commented on code in PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#discussion_r1403221124
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/spark_kubernetes.py:
##
@@ -17,173 +17,271 @@
# under the License.
from __future__ import annotations
-import
Taragolis commented on issue #35812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35812#issuecomment-1824228946
docker-compose sample is not a production level example. It just exists for
simple purpose "Quick run and say 'Whoa! it actually works!'" however
configuration for production mig
Taragolis commented on issue #35812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35812#issuecomment-1824234548
> Also the current default bind -
${AIRFLOW_PROJ_DIR:-.}/config:/opt/airflow/config is misleading where file
airflow.cfg should be stored in the container.
It might be sto
Lee-W opened a new pull request, #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
pankajkoti commented on code in PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#discussion_r1403251382
##
BREEZE.rst:
##
@@ -949,6 +949,23 @@ In this case, disabling IPv6 in the host machine and using
IPv4 instead resolved
The similar issue could happen if you are
phanikumv commented on code in PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#discussion_r1403253983
##
BREEZE.rst:
##
@@ -949,6 +949,23 @@ In this case, disabling IPv6 in the host machine and using
IPv4 instead resolved
The similar issue could happen if you are
Lee-W commented on code in PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#discussion_r1403255497
##
BREEZE.rst:
##
@@ -949,6 +949,23 @@ In this case, disabling IPv6 in the host machine and using
IPv4 instead resolved
The similar issue could happen if you are behi
Lee-W commented on code in PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#discussion_r1403255497
##
BREEZE.rst:
##
@@ -949,6 +949,23 @@ In this case, disabling IPv6 in the host machine and using
IPv4 instead resolved
The similar issue could happen if you are behi
Lee-W commented on code in PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#discussion_r1403256063
##
BREEZE.rst:
##
@@ -949,6 +949,23 @@ In this case, disabling IPv6 in the host machine and using
IPv4 instead resolved
The similar issue could happen if you are behi
Taragolis commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-1824276280
`No such image` Error also could be resolve by run one of this command, both
of them also support `--python` option
```console
breeze ci-image pull
```
or
```co
potiuk commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-1824305316
Actually this is not the right solution. The problem is that image should be
automatically build if it is missing, there should never be the need to pull it
manually.
Likely this
droppoint commented on PR #35800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35800#issuecomment-1824311383
The completed pods are not a problem because they consume no resources, and
they will be deleted during the airflow cleanup-pods cronjob execution.
However, a TaskInstance can get stu
hamedhsn commented on PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#issuecomment-1824328879
@bolkedebruin I will fix your above comment. What is the best place to put
some usage examples, can you point me to the location?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Taragolis commented on issue #35805:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35805#issuecomment-1824329980
@scnerd would you change issue title to less broad and which could describe
your problem in short
---
In addition I have a look `boto3` documentation for
[`Redshift
hamedhsn commented on code in PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#discussion_r1403314801
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/custom_object_launcher.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or mo
hamedhsn commented on code in PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#discussion_r1403317000
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/spark_kubernetes.py:
##
@@ -17,173 +17,271 @@
# under the License.
from __future__ import annotations
-import date
slmg opened a new issue, #35815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35815
### Official Helm Chart version
1.10.0
### Apache Airflow version
2.6.3
### Kubernetes Version
1.27.7
### Helm Chart configuration
values.yaml
```yaml
hakuno commented on code in PR #35362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35362#discussion_r1403329260
##
chart/templates/_helpers.yaml:
##
@@ -995,3 +995,11 @@ capabilities:
app: keda-operator
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
+
+{{- define "deployment_strategy" }
hakuno commented on code in PR #35362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35362#discussion_r1403329260
##
chart/templates/_helpers.yaml:
##
@@ -995,3 +995,11 @@ capabilities:
app: keda-operator
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
+
+{{- define "deployment_strategy" }
jordi-crespo opened a new issue, #35817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35817
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### What happened
airflow_version: 2.6.2
Deployed in: Azure Kubernetes Service
I am encounterin
bolkedebruin commented on PR #22253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22253#issuecomment-1824404326
> @bolkedebruin I will fix your above comment. What is the best place to put
some usage examples, can you point me to the location?
I'd like to see documentation here as a se
Taragolis opened a new pull request, #35818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35818
Currently `write_default_airflow_configuration_if_needed` create Airflow
Home directory, which should work in case if user doesn't redefine
`AIRFLOW_CONFIG` environment variable.
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #35819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35819
Adding OpenLineage support for the following operators:
- S3FileTransformOperator
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines
bolkedebruin opened a new pull request, #35820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35820
This allows storage options to be passed on to the underlying
implementation. It does require a release of the providers as the signature of
`get_fs` has changed.
@kaxil @uranusjr @Tarag
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 910c95ea64 Consolidate environment variable calcula
potiuk merged PR #35801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35801
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
Taragolis opened a new pull request, #35821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35821
Use same name of product as it mentioned in the official page:
https://opensearch.org/
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelin
Lee-W commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-1824629892
> Was there any special you've done (cleaning docker etc.? @Lee-W - can you
come up withe a scenario where this could happen ? I might try to reproduce it,
but if you more ore less know h
Taragolis commented on code in PR #35820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35820#discussion_r1403531115
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/fs/s3.py:
##
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class SignError(Exception):
"""Raises when unable to sign a S3 request."""
-def get_fs(conn_
dstandish opened a new pull request, #35822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35822
This object was completely unused in OSS but others may have depended on it
and it is kinder to remove it in a major release.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
dstandish commented on PR #35800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35800#issuecomment-1824655540
In case it is important to adopt pods, but we need a fix to do it safely,
just throwing out some ideas before i disappear for holiday.
The scheduler can know which other schedul
potiuk commented on PR #35813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35813#issuecomment-1824658121
Ok. I think (maybe you can check) just adding
check_and_rebuild_image_if_needed() when the start command run should solve the
problem. It I lis for sure done in shell command and default
JCoder01 commented on code in PR #35800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35800#discussion_r1403249411
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/executors/kubernetes_executor.py:
##
@@ -642,39 +641,6 @@ def adopt_launched_task(
del tis_to_flush_by_key[ti_key]
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ef2ad070c2 Add OpenLineage support to `S3FileTran
vincbeck merged PR #35819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35819
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
xmariachi commented on issue #35474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35474#issuecomment-1824683187
> @xmariachi Hi, I also use mwaa and have come across this behaviour. What
is the status of the task when it gets stuck? We had the task in a queued
state, and noticed the sqs ag
hterik opened a new issue, #35823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35823
### Description
Right now the definition for `Context` is a `TypedDict` with `total=False`.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/910c95ea64b6e14bff842a031e019c95f2ed/airflow/utils/context.p
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new f8b9239e57 Updating con
pankajkoti merged PR #35822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35822
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airfl
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pankajkoti pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from ef2ad070c2 Add OpenLineage support to `S3FileTransformOperator`
(#35819)
add ca97feed18 Revert Remove PodLogg
romsharon98 opened a new pull request, #35824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35824
Fixes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35815
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/a
Taragolis commented on issue #35823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35823#issuecomment-1824768315
> The addition of total=False was done in following PR and seems very
unrelated to the change at hand there. Maybe it was a mistake?
I think this was added due to deprecate
vincbeck merged PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
vincbeck closed issue #35703: Add EC2RebootInstanceOperator and
EC2HibernateInstanceOperator to Amazon Provider
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35703
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
vincbeck merged PR #35821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35821
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ca1202fd31 Add `EC2HibernateInstanceOperator` and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new eb691fc013 Use `OpenSearch` instead of `Open Sear
bolkedebruin commented on code in PR #35820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35820#discussion_r1403643831
##
airflow/providers/google/cloud/fs/gcs.py:
##
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
schemes = ["gs", "gcs"]
-def get_fs(conn_id: str | None) -> AbstractFileSystem:
+def get_f
ShivamPatel-24 commented on issue #35823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35823#issuecomment-1824789835
Hi @Taragolis, I am looking to contribute, but am new to it.
Can you guide me through what needs to be done to resolve this issue?
--
This is an automated message f
hussein-awala commented on code in PR #35185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185#discussion_r1403682530
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/kubernetes_commands.py:
##
@@ -1036,8 +1047,47 @@ def _deploy_airflow(
executor=executor,
use_standa
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #35804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35804#discussion_r1403683906
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/auth_manager/avp/facade.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributo
pankajkoti opened a new pull request, #35825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35825
closes: #35698
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rs
pankajkoti commented on PR #35825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35825#issuecomment-1824864322
Preview of the locally built docs:
 were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new b07d79908c Implements JSON-string connection rep
potiuk commented on PR #35185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185#issuecomment-1824872772
I guess later we can add multi-namespace mode to run in CI. We likely do not
want to add another dimention for k8s tests but we can do what we do in
databases with some kind of rotating
pateash opened a new pull request, #35827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35827
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-
potiuk merged PR #35827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35827
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new afe14ceb62 breeze - docs added pipx python flag (#3
pateash commented on issue #12696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12696#issuecomment-1824877991
this is already done using --anonymize so should be closed
@turbaszek
https://github.com/apache/airflow/assets/16856802/02a2a8a7-130c-487e-bec7-226acdb7baa3";>
vs
hussein-awala commented on PR #35185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185#issuecomment-182483
> I guess later we can add multi-namespace mode to run in CI. We likely do
not want to add another dimention for k8s tests but we can do what we do in
databases with some kind of
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
husseinawala pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 0e157b38a3 Fix K8S executor override config u
hussein-awala commented on PR #35185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185#issuecomment-1824891188
Finally 🎉
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
hussein-awala merged PR #35185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35185
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@ai
hussein-awala opened a new pull request, #35828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35828
Currently, the test runs with 3 parallel processes, but there are 4 tests.
The last test starts when the 3 other tests finish, which leads to resources
and time wasting. Running the 4 tests in
potiuk commented on PR #35828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35828#issuecomment-1824908372
Few comments:
Let's see. Tried that before but it was introducing a lot of random failures
(likely 4 k8s simply use too much memory).
Likely we could think about switching a
pateash commented on issue #35415:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35415#issuecomment-1824923428
hi @hliu-VoleonGroup
this logicalDate represents(logical date of next dagrun) or the Data
interval end time ( when SLA was fired ).
https://github.com/apache/airflow/ass
hussein-awala commented on PR #35828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35828#issuecomment-1824939251
> doing it this way is good for experimenting, but not good for merging
Yes, it's just to test, then we can discuss the implementation if we find
some benefits.
--
This
vincbeck commented on code in PR #35804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35804#discussion_r1403761025
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/auth_manager/avp/facade.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor
jscheffl commented on issue #35817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35817#issuecomment-1824963562
Reading this I can confirm that statsd is working in our setup in K8s with
the standard helm chart very stable sine ~1 year at least.
Am I correct to assume that your statsd con
jscheffl commented on issue #35806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35806#issuecomment-1824972361
Thanks for the analysis and the details shared! This helps understanding
your concerns directly.
Regarding (1): I underatand
Regarding (2) I believe the standard in a
potiuk commented on PR #35828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35828#issuecomment-1824976608
> > doing it this way is good for experimenting, but not good for merging
>
> Yes, it's just to test, then we can discuss the implementation if we find
some benefits.
And ye
potiuk commented on PR #35828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35828#issuecomment-1824976961
Yeah... same case - a lot of "connection reset by peer" - which likely means
killed by lack of memory.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825004349
This merge broke the system tests; t4g.micro instances can not be
hibernated. Did you test this out? If so, I don't suppose you remember which
instance size worked for you?
`
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825009160
Looking through the code, it looks like you are checking for a hibernation
option, but the exception you are raising `raise AirflowException(f"Instance
{instance['InstanceId']} is not
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #35195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35195#issuecomment-1825012227
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #34451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34451#issuecomment-1825012274
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
Joffreybvn commented on PR #35591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35591#issuecomment-1825016420
Thanks for the detailed answer !
I won't go for proxy settings and extra parameters in this PR. Just for
info, adding a tool like [forwarder](https://github.com/saucelabs/forwa
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #35591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35591#discussion_r1403798873
##
airflow/providers/http/hooks/http.py:
##
@@ -71,20 +71,13 @@ def __init__(
self.method = method.upper()
self.base_url: str = ""
self.
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #35591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35591#discussion_r1403798873
##
airflow/providers/http/hooks/http.py:
##
@@ -71,20 +71,13 @@ def __init__(
self.method = method.upper()
self.base_url: str = ""
self.
dashton90 commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825021497
I tested on an m4.large instance
And didn't come across as harsh at all. Please let me know how I can assist
with the system tests.
--
This is an automated message from the A
dashton90 commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825022256
As a separate note, are these tests available publicly? Would be happy to
follow any additional steps before opening a PR in the future
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825024215
What do you think about the unit tests? Do they need to be tweaked?
> I tested on an m4.large instance
Cool. I'll see if I can find documentation around which sizes DO w
dashton90 commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825027155
> Cool. I'll see if I can find documentation around which sizes DO work, but
at least we have a place to start now.
The supported instances are listed
[here](https://docs.aws.a
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825031115
> The supported instances are listed
[here](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/hibernating-prerequisites.html#hibernation-prereqs-supported-instance-families)
Yo
dashton90 commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825031778
Just re-reading through your comments:
> Looking through the code, it looks like you are checking for a hibernation
option, but the exception you are raising raise AirflowExcept
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825035261
> If you'd like, I can update the example to use an m4 or t3 instance.
I'm running it against my live AWS account. It is going need a few other
changes, too. The AMI architect
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825035554
> The example_ec2 DAG would never get to this operator since it is failing
during instance creation.
Yup, good catch. My mistake.
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
dashton90 commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825038027
> Do you want to poke at it and get it sorted out, or do you want me to?
If you're already on it then I'll leave it to you. But happy to take over if
you need another set of eye
ferruzzi commented on PR #35790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35790#issuecomment-1825044746
It looks like in order to get this working we're going to need to set up a
KMS key and manually define the device mappings to configure an EBS volume. I
won't be able to get this done
potiuk opened a new pull request, #35830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35830
Some of our pre-commits were using code from Breeze in rather complex way -
by inserting PYTHONPATH and importing code from there. That was complex and
brittle and with recent changes of ShelParam #3
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
