potiuk commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424966653
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
options =
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 82b3c11277 Improve CI.rst document clarity.
potiuk merged PR #36181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36181
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #36181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36181#issuecomment-1853413106
Nice. @UncertainBadg3r - I wonder how you prepared the PR - did you use
some LLMS or other tools to generate the clearer version of the description ?
Or was that written by hand ?
--
potiuk commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1853405709
Yeah. Apologies I missed that 臘
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on issue #36193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36193#issuecomment-1853406263
Sure :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to annotated tag 2.8.0rc2
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
*** WARNING: tag 2.8.0rc2 was modified! ***
from 34791d72d6 (commit)
to 0e8ee5bc2a (tag)
eladkal commented on code in PR #36197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36197#discussion_r1424897286
##
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_bug_report.yml:
##
@@ -31,17 +31,26 @@ body:
- "Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)"
validations:
Author: ephraimanierobi
Date: Wed Dec 13 06:18:41 2023
New Revision: 66027
Log:
Remove old release: 2.8.0rc1
Removed:
dev/airflow/2.8.0rc1/
Author: ephraimanierobi
Date: Wed Dec 13 06:18:08 2023
New Revision: 66026
Log:
Add artifacts for Airflow 2.8.0rc2
Added:
dev/airflow/2.8.0rc2/
dev/airflow/2.8.0rc2/apache-airflow-2.8.0-source.tar.gz (with props)
dev/airflow/2.8.0rc2/apache-airflow-2.8.0-source.tar.gz.asc
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to annotated tag constraints-2.8.0rc2
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
*** WARNING: tag constraints-2.8.0rc2 was modified! ***
from 35ebec1d9a (commit)
to
sunank200 commented on code in PR #36177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36177#discussion_r1424884362
##
airflow/providers/weaviate/hooks/weaviate.py:
##
@@ -396,28 +399,46 @@ def batch_data(
.. seealso:: `batch_config_params options
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-8-stable
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from d0c1c452ce Update RELEASE_NOTES.rst
add 34791d72d6 Fix compatibility of updated `airflow.io` with
ephraimbuddy merged PR #36189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36189
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
josh-fell opened a new pull request, #36198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36198
The `google-cloud-pubsub` library was [recently
released](https://pypi.org/project/google-cloud-pubsub/2.19.0/) with a bug fix
to update the `retry` parameter when using the SubscriberAsyncClient
o-nikolas commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1853290953
> ah can i work on this part of starting the triggerer with system-tests
@potiuk @o-nikolas ?
>
> Edit: I will open it as a different PR and submit the fix
Yes please!
Bowrna commented on issue #36193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36193#issuecomment-1853279483
Can i pick this issue too? @potiuk @vincbeck
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
Bowrna commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1853278229
ah can i work on this part of starting the triggerer with system-tests
@potiuk @o-nikolas ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
josh-fell opened a new pull request, #36197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36197
The current Airflow bug template asks users to specify other Airflow 2.X
versions "below" if not the latest pre-release, stable release, or `main`, but
never setting aside a place for this input.
UncertainBadg3r commented on PR #36181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36181#issuecomment-1853226292
> Static checks are failing, but this looks great!
Ah, trailing whitespace! It should all be removed now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
joshfell pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 6ee4d402e5 fix connection type webhdfs (#36145)
josh-fell merged PR #36145:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36145
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
josh-fell commented on code in PR #36177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36177#discussion_r1424807715
##
airflow/providers/weaviate/hooks/weaviate.py:
##
@@ -606,3 +627,220 @@ def object_exists(self, uuid: str | UUID, **kwargs) ->
bool:
"""
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
joshfell pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 09b6ab9081 Fix typo in dependency approach
josh-fell merged PR #36196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36196
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
josh-fell commented on code in PR #36171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36171#discussion_r1424797740
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/athena_sql.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor
cabbagepatchman opened a new pull request, #36196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36196
Noticed a minor typo while reviewing the readme
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
syedahsn commented on code in PR #36179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36179#discussion_r1424742197
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/utils/exponential_backoff_retry.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
syedahsn commented on code in PR #36179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36179#discussion_r1424741783
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/utils/exponential_backoff_retry.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
syedahsn commented on code in PR #36179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36179#discussion_r1424732236
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/executors/ecs/ecs_executor.py:
##
@@ -288,6 +333,9 @@ def attempt_task_runs(self):
_failure_reasons = []
potiuk commented on issue #36188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36188#issuecomment-1853104463
cc: @ferruzzi ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
cbuffett commented on issue #34497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34497#issuecomment-1853083625
Unfortunately I'm still seeing the infinite rescheduling issue after
upgrading to Airflow 2.7.2. I believe the issue still revolves around the fact
that the following code
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #32786:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32786#issuecomment-1853061371
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #35097: Replace numpy example with
practical exercise demonstrating top-level code
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35097
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 4a4913c6f7 Improve/simplify/remove superfluous
potiuk merged PR #36195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36195
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk opened a new pull request, #36195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36195
Few small nits in commands used for relase process for providers
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
potiuk commented on issue #36187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36187#issuecomment-1852905056
> We should indeed test, but should we not yank the older released
providers? This seems over doing the backwards compat (and maintaining it!)
While the feature , somewhat
potiuk commented on issue #36187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36187#issuecomment-1852897234
> Well maybe not as they are existing providers, unlike common.io. Still it
feels weird. If a change ends up in a provider before generally usable and
still being worked on we
potiuk commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424629695
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
options =
potiuk commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424629695
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
options =
bolkedebruin commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424623825
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
potiuk opened a new issue, #36194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36194
### Body
I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider
packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?
The guidelines on how
bolkedebruin commented on issue #36187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36187#issuecomment-1852883499
We should indeed test, but should we not yank the older released providers?
This seems over doing the backwards compat (and maintaining it!) While the
feature , somewhat
potiuk opened a new pull request, #908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/908
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch add-documentation-2023-12-12
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
at 1f579da82f Add documentation for packages - 2023-12-12
This branch includes the
bolkedebruin commented on PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#issuecomment-1852873466
Mmm yes I understand. Sorry for this, I mentioned when merging the other it
would require a release of the providers and wanted to prevent backwards compat
check (which is silly
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 6f57ee1256 Add capability of passing a bucket to
vincbeck merged PR #36192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36192
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Author: potiuk
Date: Tue Dec 12 21:10:16 2023
New Revision: 66014
Log:
Add artifacts for Airflow Providers 2023-12-12
Added:
dev/airflow/providers/apache_airflow_providers_daskexecutor-1.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
(with props)
Author: potiuk
Date: Tue Dec 12 21:03:56 2023
New Revision: 66013
Log:
Add new PGP key of Jarek Potiuk
Modified:
release/airflow/KEYS
Modified: release/airflow/KEYS
==
--- release/airflow/KEYS (original)
+++
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 64931b1a65 Prepare docs 1st wave of Providers
potiuk merged PR #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
vincbeck commented on issue #32210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32210#issuecomment-1852735740
I was just starting this task but I did not think about the consequences. If
we deprecate configs in the `webserver` section in core Airflow and copy these
to the FAB provider
vincbeck opened a new issue, #36193:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36193
### Description
Providers can provide custom auth managers. It would be interesting that, in
the same fashion as `airflow providers executors`, to have a CLI command
`airflow providers
potiuk commented on code in PR #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190#discussion_r1424513423
##
airflow/providers/daskexecutor/__init__.py:
##
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@
__all__ = ["__version__"]
-__version__ = "1.1.0"
+__version__ = "1.2.0"
try:
from
eladkal commented on code in PR #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190#discussion_r1424507863
##
airflow/providers/daskexecutor/__init__.py:
##
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@
__all__ = ["__version__"]
-__version__ = "1.1.0"
+__version__ = "1.2.0"
try:
from
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c2f440d827 Avoid bumping min-airflow-version in
potiuk merged PR #36191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36191
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
eladkal commented on code in PR #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190#discussion_r1424483662
##
airflow/providers/daskexecutor/CHANGELOG.rst:
##
@@ -27,11 +27,29 @@
Changelog
-
-1.1.1
+1.2.0
Review Comment:
if
eladkal closed pull request #907: Fix daskexecutor provider docs
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
vincbeck commented on code in PR #28900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28900#discussion_r1424467194
##
airflow/models/dag.py:
##
@@ -1383,8 +1384,43 @@ def normalized_schedule_interval(self) ->
ScheduleInterval:
_schedule_interval =
eladkal commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852652281
Following our discussion closed due to
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36191
Thanks @potiuk
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
potiuk commented on issue #31826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31826#issuecomment-1852647677
Reopened as @o-nikolas mentioned the idea here was for SYSTEM TESTS to
support triggerer - see
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1852622579
--
This is an
potiuk commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1852646164
Ah No. Indeed it's only start-airflow 臘
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
vandonr-amz opened a new issue, #31826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/31826
### Description
As discussed in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ss0605b561bcrrlogydgww1pzo97691j
It would be helpful to be able to start a triggerer process from the same
command line that
vincbeck opened a new pull request, #36192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36192
Sometimes the system test `example_emr` is failing because the underlying
EMR step is failing. In such case, for debugging purposes, we might want to
keep the bucket. Adding an option to pass a
potiuk opened a new pull request, #36191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36191
The change #36160 included removed providers in documentation generation -
which is unnecesary and we should not do it.
This PR avoids doing it for removed providers.
o-nikolas commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1852622579
But will this start the triggerer for system tests as well? Or just when
using start-airflow?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on code in PR #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190#discussion_r1424434055
##
airflow/providers/daskexecutor/CHANGELOG.rst:
##
@@ -27,11 +27,29 @@
Changelog
-
-1.1.1
+1.2.0
Review Comment:
See the discussion in
o-nikolas commented on issue #35164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35164#issuecomment-1852604590
Closing this one for now, since we lost engagement a bit. If we see this
again we could think about adding more logging, but so far we just have one
data point.
--
This is an
potiuk commented on PR #36180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36180#issuecomment-1852596743
> I had a feeling that the very mention of "we should add this to CI" would
trigger a Jarek-special PR.
Very much so :D
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
potiuk commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852591497
> That means modifying pre-commit and enabling 2.5.0 back
Does it? I think we do not do any pre-commit that would prevent dask
executor to keep 2.5.0 (but maybe I am wrong and
shubham22 commented on issue #34823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34823#issuecomment-1852585468
@treyyi - please let us know if you're looking into this. If not Treyyi@,
@flolas, would you have time to implement this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
o-nikolas commented on code in PR #36179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36179#discussion_r1424417256
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/utils/exponential_backoff_retry.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
eladkal commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852574305
> We should not bump min-airflow version for this package - it should be
identical as the last released version with the only difference being the
description in PyPI. There is no
josh-fell commented on PR #36180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36180#issuecomment-1852573398
Thanks for whipping that up @potiuk!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
josh-fell commented on PR #36180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36180#issuecomment-1852572656
I had a feeling that the very mention of "we should add this to CI" would
trigger a Jarek-special PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
josh-fell closed pull request #36180: Remove duplicate dropdown entry in
providers issue template
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36180
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852571177
Ah then 1.2.0 is wrong. We should not bump Airflow min version for
daskexecutor. Ths "upgrade min airflow" version will sklp bumping it at least.
We should not bump min-airflow
potiuk commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852565967
So both - releasing 1.1.1 package and documentation for it are absolutely
intended and needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
eladkal commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852566766
> Well. We SHOULD release daskexecutor 1.1.1 as part of this wave. That's
the whole point of having the last release which will have "removed" notice in
the `PyPI` description - there
potiuk commented on PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907#issuecomment-1852564367
Well. We SHOULD release daskexecutor 1.1.1 as part of this wave. That's the
whole point of having the last release which will have "removed" notice in the
`PyPI` description - there is
eladkal closed pull request #36190: Prepare docs 1st wave of Providers December
2023 RC2
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
eladkal opened a new pull request, #36190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36190
Providers for RC2:
daskexecutor, databricks, docker, google, odbc
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
eladkal opened a new pull request, #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/907
There is no daskexecutor 1.1.1
It seems that doc build created this package though it wasn't part of the
release wave - I will investigate and fix the problem with the doc build
--
This is an
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch dask
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
at b70120e764 Fix daskexecutor provider docs
This branch includes the following new commits:
new b70120e764
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-8
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-8 by this push:
new c96b5c79b3 Updating
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request, #36189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36189
Time for `2.8.0rc2`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a commit to branch v2-8-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-8-test by this push:
new 34791d72d6 Fix compatibility of
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 7799c51e15 Fix compatibility of updated
ephraimbuddy merged PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mpgreg commented on code in PR #36177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36177#discussion_r1424283026
##
airflow/providers/weaviate/hooks/weaviate.py:
##
@@ -606,3 +627,220 @@ def object_exists(self, uuid: str | UUID, **kwargs) ->
bool:
"""
client =
mpgreg commented on code in PR #36177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36177#discussion_r1424109843
##
airflow/providers/weaviate/hooks/weaviate.py:
##
@@ -396,28 +399,46 @@ def batch_data(
.. seealso:: `batch_config_params options
Jeoffreybauvin opened a new issue, #36188:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36188
### What do you see as an issue?
I wasn't sure if it's a doc issue or a code issue.
For me, dag_processing.processes should be considered as a gauge, not a
counter, due to negative
potiuk commented on issue #36187:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36187#issuecomment-1852328549
cc: @bolkedebruin
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424225335
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
options =
potiuk commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424216835
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
options =
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186#discussion_r1424205810
##
airflow/io/__init__.py:
##
@@ -86,7 +93,13 @@ def get_fs(
raise ValueError(f"No filesystem registered for scheme {scheme}") from
None
potiuk opened a new pull request, #36186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36186
The released providers added support to previous version of the `airflow.io`
- where options were not passed to `get_fs` method that provides Fsspec
compatible FileSystem. However #35820 added
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
