ramkunwarmeghwal commented on issue #10964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10964#issuecomment-1857435187
Thanks @potiuk , solved this problem, increased timeout in airflow.cfg file
`web_server_master_timeout = 300` and `web_server_worker_timeout = 300`
--
This is an
Bowrna closed pull request #36234: Update BREEZE.rst with different test example
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36234
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch airflow_280blog
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
from b4405292d7 fixup! fixup! Airflow 2.8.0 blog post
add 6b2c41fc21 fixup! fixup! fixup!
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#discussion_r1427221843
##
airflow/providers/databricks/hooks/databricks_sql.py:
##
@@ -80,8 +85,18 @@ def __init__(
self.http_headers = http_headers
self.catalog =
Bowrna opened a new pull request, #36234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36234
Updating the breeze docs with different pytest example as the function
mentioned in the example is removed from the test_core.py
---
**^ Add meaningful
phanikumv commented on code in PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/906#discussion_r1427558606
##
landing-pages/site/content/en/blog/airflow-2.8.0/index.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+title: "Apache Airflow 2.8.0 is here"
+linkTitle: "Apache Airflow 2.8.0
phanikumv commented on code in PR #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/906#discussion_r1427557860
##
landing-pages/site/content/en/blog/airflow-2.8.0/index.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+title: "Apache Airflow 2.8.0 is here"
+linkTitle: "Apache Airflow 2.8.0
calvinwijya commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1857274476
> > > i think the new key version is: A8D3785C
> > > https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.2/en/checking-gpg-signature.html
> > > the thing is even if i set this before my
Taragolis commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1857165776
> we have a chance to get the same troubleshooting in the end of the 2024
Clarification in the end of October 2025
```console
pub rsa4096 2023-10-23 [SC]
Taragolis commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1857158711
I think the problem might be on Oracle side, packages are signed by expired
key `3A79BD29` and new GPG key doesn't `3A79BD29`, but according to the
shubham22 commented on issue #35490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35490#issuecomment-1857074044
I'd vote for simplicity and keeping things consistent irrespective of the
type of the field, which means `executor_config` should _always_ override the
`run_task_kwargs` for any
mycaule commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1857053157
you can also `RUN apt update --allow-insecure-repositories` until a fix is
coming out.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #35243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35243#issuecomment-1857050406
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #34666:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34666#issuecomment-1857050517
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #34311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34311#issuecomment-1857050732
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #34321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34321#issuecomment-1857050654
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #34487:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34487#issuecomment-1857050587
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #35431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35431#issuecomment-1857050343
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
o-nikolas commented on PR #36063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36063#issuecomment-1856968452
Yeah, I think this is fine if the triggerer doesn't take up too many
resources. Since often the test may not be making use of it. Depending on
whether the operators support it or not
tirkarthi commented on PR #35863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35863#issuecomment-1856858784
@bbovenzi Please feel free to push changes. I tried to fix conflicts since
recent xcom details page also had changes to tab number and panels in same file
so please verify if the
shohamy7 commented on issue #35353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35353#issuecomment-1856750083
Hi! @ahipp13
I saw your issue, and took a look in the current helm chart (1.12.0-dev) and
it looks that the first proposal of supporting extra configuration such as
ketozhang opened a new issue, #36233:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36233
### Apache Airflow version
2.7.3
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
raghukpara commented on PR #33490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33490#issuecomment-1856667241
All I'm looking for is the endpoint URL to contain "?tags=" at the end. If I
give multiple tags I get all DAGs that have them in common. However, I want the
AND operator to act
vincbeck commented on issue #32210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32210#issuecomment-1856643074
Not so much actually: #36232
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
vincbeck opened a new pull request, #36232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36232
Some config is now used only by the new fab provider. Thus, we should move
this config to the provider
See #32210.
---
**^ Add meaningful description
dnskr commented on code in PR #36156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36156#discussion_r1427284234
##
chart/values.yaml:
##
@@ -2277,8 +2277,6 @@ cleanup:
# Not recommended for production
postgresql:
enabled: true
- image:
-tag: "11"
Review Comment:
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856588839
Yeah. That's a quick fix if you need no mysql. I still cannot reproduce it
even if I run it from scratch . So I think it really depends which cache you
hit ... I am afraid we have
acmarco commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856583460
> It looks as though the apt repository still has the old gpg key set:
https://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian/conf/distributions
For us we couldn't get the reference to the old
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856580159
I think it might depend on which cache you hit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
fdintino commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856575558
It looks as though the apt repository still has the old gpg key set:
https://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian/conf/distributions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
souzagmu commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856574225
> > i think the new key version is: A8D3785C
> > https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.2/en/checking-gpg-signature.html
> > the thing is even if i set this before my apt-get
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856568052
```
> i think the new key version is: A8D3785C
> https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.2/en/checking-gpg-signature.html
> the thing is even if i set this before my
furquan39 commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856566185
> Can anyone post the full log of failing installation in text form, please?
##[error]#7 0.874 Get:12 http://deb.debian.org/debian-security
bullseye-security/main
souzagmu commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856564664
> Can anyone post the full log of failing installation in text form, please?
```
Removing intermediate container 046364755c82
---> 191275aaf947
Step 18/31 : RUN
ltken123 commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856564080
If you add the new key
`Step 5/38 : RUN sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com
--recv-keys A8D3785C
---> Running in bcfe67535615
Warning: apt-key is
ltken123 commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856562881
If you replace the key
`#8 [stage-1 3/29] RUN gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys
A8D3785C 2>&1
#8
souzagmu commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856559164
> How about this:
>
> ```dockerfile
> RUN sudo gpg --recv-keys 3A79BD29
> ```
i think the new key version is: A8D3785C
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856558211
Can anyone post the full log of failing installation in text form, please?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
ltken123 commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856555458
`RUN sudo gpg --recv-keys 3A79BD29`
This isn't working for me either, no so great workaround to get my builds to
continue is just to remove mysql for now
--
This is an
dstandish commented on PR #36227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36227#issuecomment-1856550024
also @troyharvey interestingly we have received reports of this happening
with DBT. it always seems to be DBT-related. we actually worked pretty hard to
reproduce but could not.
bbovenzi commented on PR #34887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34887#issuecomment-1856537227
@hterik Ok I'm happy to clean up this filters+main logic. Mind to rebase the
PR first?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856536425
( and I am talking about time not timezone) - whether your time is set
properly on your machine
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856535208
How about this:
```Dockerfile
RUN gpg --recv-keys 3A79BD29
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
bbovenzi commented on PR #33490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33490#issuecomment-1856534988
UX wise, I think its difficult to keep the dropdown simple while allowing
different logic gates. Perhaps we allow the input to be both a select and a
text input where a power user can
mycaule commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856533398
I am in Europe just like you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856531953
> A quick workaround that should fix if anyone sees the problem (I can't
reproduce it - likely due to timezone). I will come with some better fix also
for historical images but
bbovenzi commented on code in PR #33490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33490#discussion_r1427231779
##
airflow/www/views.py:
##
@@ -911,10 +928,11 @@ def index(self):
dag.can_trigger = dag.can_edit and can_create_dag_run
mycaule commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856523265
> A quick workaround that should fix if anyone sees the problem (I can't
reproduce it - likely due to timezone). I will come with some better fix also
for historical images but
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856515408
A quick workaround that should fix if anyone sees the problem (I can't
reproduce it - likely due to timezone). I will come with some better fix also
for historical images but this
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#discussion_r1427221843
##
airflow/providers/databricks/hooks/databricks_sql.py:
##
@@ -80,8 +85,18 @@ def __init__(
self.http_headers = http_headers
self.catalog =
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#discussion_r1427222586
##
airflow/providers/databricks/hooks/databricks_sql.py:
##
@@ -80,8 +85,18 @@ def __init__(
self.http_headers = http_headers
self.catalog =
Joffreybvn commented on code in PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#discussion_r1427221843
##
airflow/providers/databricks/hooks/databricks_sql.py:
##
@@ -80,8 +85,18 @@ def __init__(
self.http_headers = http_headers
self.catalog =
dstandish commented on PR #36227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36227#issuecomment-1856504013
Hi @troyharvey , my secret master plan is to do a larger refactor of KPO
logging.
In short here's the plan:
* run a log fetcher in a thread per container
* each log
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856469644
Similar to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk commented on issue #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231#issuecomment-1856468916
Looks like Oracle did it again and changed their key.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk opened a new issue, #36231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36231
### Discussed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36230
Originally posted by **furquan39** December 14, 2023
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please
eliskovets commented on issue #36110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36110#issuecomment-1856464285
Hi @pateash ,
Sorry, forgot to tell you, that I also have `"AIRFLOW__API__AUTH_BACKENDS":
"airflow.api.auth.backend.default"` set.
--
This is an automated message from
troyharvey commented on PR #36227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36227#issuecomment-1856462164
@dstandish Let me know if we can help test this. We have a long-running
KubernetesPodOperator running dbt and we had to turn off `get_logs` because of
timeout issues with the task
potiuk closed issue #36229: MYSQL fails to install due to incorrect GPG Key
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36229
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
vchiapaikeo commented on PR #36226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36226#issuecomment-1856403567
cc @eladkal , @potiuk , @BasPH, @hussein-awala - would love to hear what you
think when you have a moment
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
syedahsn commented on code in PR #36179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36179#discussion_r1427137966
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/utils/exponential_backoff_retry.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #36229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36229#issuecomment-1856376817
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
furquan39 opened a new issue, #36229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36229
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.4.1
### What happened?
When
dstandish opened a new pull request, #36228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36228
Method `write_logs` was using pod manager method `read_pod_logs` which has
some rather complicated logic that it doesn't need, because it does not
"follow" the logs and because by the time we
pateash commented on issue #36110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36110#issuecomment-1856364682
Hi @eliskovets,
i am not able to repo it using
`AUTH_ROLE_PUBLIC = "Admin"`
as per my knowledge it will only affect UI access not API.
Could you please help on how
vincbeck commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856225351
Creating diagrams is actually super fun! I experienced a bug though. When I
run the script as is, everything is fine but when I generate the diagrams
through the static checks
dstandish opened a new pull request, #36227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36227
I am trying to clean up KPO logging logic a bit.
I was trying to better understand the logic in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34412. It occurred to me that one way
to understand
vincbeck commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856213983
> Sphinx speaking riddles again
>
> I will take a look after my talk (I have a talk at https://osacon.io in 45
minutes so a little stressed ;) .
Thank you :D! And good
potiuk commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856211195
Sphinx speaking riddles again
I will take a look after my talk (I have a talk at https://osacon.io in 45
minutes so a little stressed ;) .
--
This is an automated message from
vincbeck commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856206101
In the meantime, do you know why it is complaining about
`sphinx.errors.SphinxWarning:
/opt/airflow/docs/apache-airflow/security/api.rst:24:unknown document:
vchiapaikeo opened a new pull request, #36226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36226
closes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35381
Creating a TemplatedSmtpNotifier class that simplifies sending emails based
on the discussion in
potiuk commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1856184404
Constraints with databricks 5.0.0 updated
https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/33121932d4cdcd2da27756ac149791365a88f08c
and tag for 2.8.0rc3 moved @ephraimbuddy
--
This is an
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to annotated tag constraints-2.8.0rc3
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
*** WARNING: tag constraints-2.8.0rc3 was modified! ***
from 9e3c26f64b (tag)
to f07a9837d6
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-8
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-8 by this push:
new 33121932d4 Updating
romsharon98 closed pull request #36225: Fix: test_auth fails
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36225
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
bolkedebruin commented on code in PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#discussion_r1426953507
##
airflow/providers/databricks/hooks/databricks_sql.py:
##
@@ -80,8 +85,18 @@ def __init__(
self.http_headers = http_headers
self.catalog =
romsharon98 opened a new pull request, #36225:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36225
It's been an error in the [test_auth.py
](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blame/01fd0d31b46682f4d700aaacf19cfe7a0fe9a057/tests/www/test_auth.py#L126)
that makes this command to fails breeze
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch airflow_280blog
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
from f75cdbd1ce fixup! Airflow 2.8.0 blog post
add b4405292d7 fixup! fixup! Airflow 2.8.0
bbovenzi commented on PR #35863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35863#issuecomment-1856136606
I'm also happy to contribute to this branch if that would be helpful.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 8bc15c3ee3 Updating
potiuk commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856113825
BTW. You can run the pre-comit script "as-is" - as long as you have diagrams
installed in your venv it works as regular Python script
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
potiuk commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856112440
> Sounds exciting! Let me try that
Indeed, I love how they implemented it and it's really nice to iterate on
diagram, it's super-fast- just change the code, run the pre-commit
potiuk commented on code in PR #35716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35716#discussion_r1426903084
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/pod.py:
##
@@ -672,6 +672,7 @@ def invoke_defer_method(self):
)
def execute_complete(self, context:
potiuk commented on issue #34644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34644#issuecomment-1856083901
Please let us know after you investigate and (hopefully) upgrade how the
things go, so that we can (hopefully) close the ticket - in the meantime I mark
it as pending response.
potiuk commented on issue #34644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34644#issuecomment-1856081623
The lack of more details seems to be because the message is not coming from
airflow but from the POD. The message is "just" displayed by the airflow's KPO
and the error is
vincbeck commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1856046976
> Comment/ Proposal. Why don't you prepare one/two diagrams, similar to the
ones that you had in the AIP. I recently integrated the nice Python "Diagram as
a Code" tool into our
vincbeck merged PR #36217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36217
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 01fd0d31b4 Remove Redshift mention from the list
nadavgross commented on code in PR #36221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36221#discussion_r1426847708
##
airflow/providers/apache/hive/operators/hive.py:
##
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ class HiveOperator(BaseOperator):
"hiveconfs",
"mapred_job_name",
potiuk commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1856011705
Also cc: @ephraimbuddy -> since we yanked 5.0.1, I will rerun the last
build for v2-8-stable to refresh constraints and move the tag once done
(currentlly 5.0.1 was in the constraints
potiuk commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1856003948
Yanked
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1855996509
> The databricks provider was already released with the breaking change->
[5.0.1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.0.1/).
Maybe this version should be
potiuk commented on PR #36211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36211#issuecomment-1855988839
Comment/ Proposal. Why don't you prepare one/two diagrams, similar to the
ones that you had in the AIP. I recently integrated the nice Python "Diagram as
a Code" tool into our
Joffreybvn commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1855988794
The databricks provider was already released with the breaking change->
[5.0.1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.0.1/).
Maybe this version should be
potiuk commented on code in PR #36147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36147#discussion_r1426814072
##
airflow/serialization/serde.py:
##
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ def _register():
@functools.lru_cache(maxsize=None)
def _get_patterns() -> list[Pattern]:
patterns =
potiuk commented on code in PR #36147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36147#discussion_r1426809710
##
airflow/serialization/serde.py:
##
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ def _register():
@functools.lru_cache(maxsize=None)
def _get_patterns() -> list[Pattern]:
patterns =
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new e83a98603e iterate through blobs before checking
potiuk commented on PR #36202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36202#issuecomment-1855973268
Just in time for RC3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk merged PR #36202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36202
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #36205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36205#issuecomment-1855968176
And I created https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36224 and assigned to
myself and will shortly take a close look at this - to make sure the common.sql
API is not only defined but
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
