eladkal commented on issue #26542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26542#issuecomment-1916233877
> So I think if we ALSO have a way how to bring older celery configuration
to "reasonable defaults", it's worth considering to explain that in the
documentation and even our Helm
eladkal commented on issue #36994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36994#issuecomment-1916229857
I would rather this not be a UI feature. This is very dangerous operation
and with a single click of a button that was done by mistake can cause serious
problems to large
hussein-awala commented on PR #37072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37072#issuecomment-1916205910
> We usually use infrastructure as code to install the cluster and
additional things together. what is the significance installing Kueue alone?
Not true, we have an
Anush008 commented on code in PR #36805:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36805#discussion_r1470662843
##
pyproject.toml:
##
@@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ alibaba = [
"oss2>=2.14.0",
]
amazon = [
+ "PyAthena>=3.0.10",
Review Comment:
It came in with one of the merge
Anush008 commented on code in PR #36805:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36805#discussion_r1470662469
##
tests/providers/qdrant/operators/test_qdrant.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license
VladaZakharova commented on PR #37072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37072#issuecomment-1916161115
Hey @dirrao @raphaelauv !
Thank you for looking my changes.
This operator is the first one in a set operators that are needed to cover
functionality we have for GKE
jkarun opened a new issue, #37084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37084
### Apache Airflow version
2.8.1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.6.1
### What happened?
I am using dynamic task mapping of TriggerDagRunOperator
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37084#issuecomment-1916150562
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
tanelk commented on issue #37073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37073#issuecomment-1916128216
The same issue occurs when not using task groups, but it is handled a bit
more gracefully:
tanelk commented on issue #37073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37073#issuecomment-1916117531
I looked at it a bit more and the issue seems to be with the
airflow.models.taskmap.TaskMap design. The
airflow.models.taskinstance._record_task_map_for_downstreams method does not
amoghrajesh opened a new pull request, #37083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37083
Small visual fix for breeze cheatsheet
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
amoghrajesh commented on PR #35393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35393#issuecomment-1916093168
@bbovenzi @potiuk are we good for a merge here?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
amoghrajesh commented on PR #37082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37082#issuecomment-1916089538
@potiuk it is not complete, but would probably require few levels of reviews
here.
Appreciate your patience
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
amoghrajesh opened a new pull request, #37082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37082
Recently, it came to my attention that we have few unsaid rules and
practices followed regarding the security issues and their fixes in Airflow.
Introducing a new document to
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#discussion_r1470591576
##
chart/templates/scheduler/scheduler-deployment.yaml:
##
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
## Airflow Scheduler Deployment/StatefulSet
amoghrajesh commented on PR #36804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36804#issuecomment-1916066467
Oops, that was a bad rebase, removed all reviewers who got added due to it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
amoghrajesh commented on PR #36804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36804#issuecomment-1916059253
@pierrejeambrun I made the changes using flex of Box, results look the same
now:
amoghrajesh commented on code in PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#discussion_r1470577903
##
chart/templates/scheduler/scheduler-deployment.yaml:
##
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
## Airflow Scheduler Deployment/StatefulSet
amoghrajesh commented on PR #36804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36804#issuecomment-1916051280
> I don't think that manually translating by 2 px is the way to go, this is
hacky. (That might not work on every browser, screen size etc...). Just using
the flex property of the
merobi-hub opened a new issue, #945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/issues/945
Error-free installation of Airflow using the
[Quickstart](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/start.html
seems to require `virtualenv`, but there is no mention of this in the
Lee-W opened a new pull request, #37081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37081
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
jedcunningham commented on PR #36882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36882#issuecomment-1916006948
> > I see you added retires counter. What do you think about custom delay
between each retry of exceeded quota also? My issue is the high rate of
requests to Kubernetes API and
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #36882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36882#discussion_r1470543337
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/provider.yaml:
##
@@ -350,6 +350,15 @@ config:
type: string
example: ~
default: ""
+
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#discussion_r1470539324
##
helm_tests/airflow_core/test_scheduler.py:
##
@@ -901,3 +902,19 @@ def test_overridden_automount_service_account_token(self):
josh-fell commented on code in PR #36805:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36805#discussion_r1470517045
##
pyproject.toml:
##
@@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ alibaba = [
"oss2>=2.14.0",
]
amazon = [
+ "PyAthena>=3.0.10",
Review Comment:
Is this a related change?
josh-fell commented on code in PR #36953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36953#discussion_r1470489935
##
airflow/providers/teradata/example_dags/example_teradata_operator.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#
dirrao commented on PR #36882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36882#issuecomment-1915929151
> I see you added retires counter. What do you think about custom delay
between each retry of exceeded quota also? My issue is the high rate of
requests to Kubernetes API and currently
shayoo9814 commented on issue #37078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37078#issuecomment-1915906602
I still believe there is value to be gained from the proposed change for the
following reasons.
1. Consistent interface for Airflow customizations
`airflow.cfg` is what
RNHTTR commented on code in PR #36797:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36797#discussion_r1470456522
##
airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py:
##
@@ -1098,6 +1098,7 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: dict[str, Any])
-> Operator:
hussein-awala commented on issue #8792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8792#issuecomment-1915863325
As a workaround, we can use the new callbacks class:
```python
class XComCallbacks(KubernetesPodOperatorCallback):
@staticmethod
def on_pod_completion(*,
potiuk commented on PR #37055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37055#issuecomment-1915824822
> Now that you explicitly fail if both parameters are specified, you could
potentially simplify this statement: `if self.max_rows_per_file and not
self.groupby_kwargs:` But I'll leave
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8914e49551 SqlToS3Operator: feat/ add
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #37055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37055#issuecomment-1915824330
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to
check our [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues) for
additional
potiuk merged PR #37055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37055
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #37078: Add two new fields (gunicorn_logconfig &
gunicorn_logconfig_dict) to airflow.cfg to allow users to configure Airflow
Webserver logs
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37078
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on issue #37078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37078#issuecomment-1915819055
You can configure gunicorn settings by GUNICORN_CMD_ARGS variable
SuperBo commented on PR #37025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37025#issuecomment-1915809441
hi @Joffreybvn, I fixed the code style
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk closed issue #37074: Config variable
execute_tasks_new_python_interpreter not sufficiently documented
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37074
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #34224: Add run_id to event logs API
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34224
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #34707: BeamRunPythonPipelineOperator:
push_xcom dataflow_job_id right before starting pipeline
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34707
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #35610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35610#issuecomment-1915805486
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #36222:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36222#issuecomment-1915805441
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
hussein-awala commented on issue #8792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8792#issuecomment-1915799699
I'm interested in this proposed feature (btw it is not a bug). I tried to
create something generic as @potiuk suggested, but it's too complicated since
we don't return any
hussein-awala commented on PR #37079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37079#issuecomment-1915788086
I will add some tests after discussing the solution.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
hussein-awala opened a new pull request, #37079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37079
Closes: #8792
This PR adds a new argument `do_xcom_push_on_failure` to
`KubernetesPodOperator` to load and push the XCom with a different key when the
pod fails.
--
This is an
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37078#issuecomment-1915763537
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
shayoo9814 opened a new issue, #37078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37078
### Description
Today, Airflow users lack the ability to configure Airflow Webserver logs.
(Users can only configure [access
logs](https://docs.gunicorn.org/en/stable/settings.html#accesslog),
jscheffl closed issue #36119: Audit logs entry as clear event even if we click
on the tasks.
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36119
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jscheffl commented on issue #36119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36119#issuecomment-1915583326
Fixed in #36941
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
eladkal commented on code in PR #37043:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37043#discussion_r1470167194
##
airflow/providers/apache/hive/CHANGELOG.rst:
##
@@ -27,6 +27,17 @@
Changelog
-
+7.0.0
+.
+
+
+Breaking changes
+
+
+*
dstandish commented on PR #36876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36876#issuecomment-1915475826
> I am good for it - @dstandish ? What do you think?
Seems we just replace warnings.warn with deprecated decorator, seems fine,
to me
--
This is an automated message from
jscheffl commented on issue #37074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37074#issuecomment-1915443970
Have you considered raising a PR and contributing an improvement?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
hussein-awala commented on PR #37058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37058#issuecomment-1915398665
> > > If we chose 2 then it makes sense to move it into common.io (with all
the extras that it requires cause it is a 'new' capability for a provider).
> >
> >
> > I
ketozhang commented on code in PR #37047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37047#discussion_r1470039181
##
docs/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/operators.rst:
##
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ You can print out the Kubernetes manifest for the pod that
would be created
bolkedebruin commented on PR #37058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37058#issuecomment-1915338997
Ok ill move it to the provider.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
eladkal commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469998144
##
docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/deprecations.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+ .. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or more
eladkal commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469994293
##
docs/spelling_wordlist.txt:
##
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ avp
Avro
avro
aws
+AwsBaseAsyncHook
Review Comment:
That is odd
I don't think the right fix is to add
kacpermuda commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469992933
##
docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/deprecations.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+ .. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or
kacpermuda commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469991675
##
docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/deprecations.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+ .. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or
eladkal commented on code in PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#discussion_r1469990838
##
helm_tests/airflow_core/test_scheduler.py:
##
@@ -901,3 +902,18 @@ def test_overridden_automount_service_account_token(self):
eladkal commented on code in PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#discussion_r1469989502
##
helm_tests/airflow_core/test_scheduler.py:
##
@@ -901,3 +902,19 @@ def test_overridden_automount_service_account_token(self):
kacpermuda commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469989464
##
docs/spelling_wordlist.txt:
##
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ avp
Avro
avro
aws
+AwsBaseAsyncHook
Review Comment:
Ah, this will be needed when #36876 is merged
eladkal commented on code in PR #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075#discussion_r1469966259
##
docs/apache-airflow-providers/core-extensions/deprecations.rst:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+ .. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or more
eladm26 commented on issue #37030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37030#issuecomment-1915231534
Hi,
Will be happy to take this one as a first issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ImpressionableRaccoon opened a new pull request, #37076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37076
try to use endpoint from connection if it not specified in `backend_kwargs`
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
potiuk commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915219666
We release our providers roughly every two weeks. Byut if you REALLY want
you can easily build your own provider packages we have instructions available
to do so - this way you
potiuk commented on PR #37058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37058#issuecomment-1915207986
Yeah. My suggestion was bad idea and you pointed out it's not needed indeed.
And yes I thought that the change could actually be split In two : Base XCOM
change for small/big values for
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915166094
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues?q=is%3Aissue+Status+of+testing+Providers+is%3Aclosed+
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
paramjeet01 commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915158946
@raphaelauv When are we planning to release the new version ? or is it
automated by pipelines and we wait till then ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
raphaelauv commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915150429
close cause fix is merged , does not mean it was deploy in a new release
and `7.14.0` is 2 days old , It can't include a fix merged 30 minutes ago
--
This is an
gbonazzoli commented on issue #36678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678#issuecomment-1915131712
The issue is said to be closed but it seems that
`apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes 7.14.0` does not think so.
```
ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not
jedcunningham commented on PR #36917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36917#issuecomment-1915114549
Okay, this should be ready now :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #37075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37075
## TLDR
I want to add a documentation page that will have all the deprecated
classes, methods, functions etc. It will get more information when #36876 is
merged (where i switched
raphaelauv commented on PR #37072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37072#issuecomment-1915062317
Why add an operator in airflow to install `kueue` in a GKE ?
the installation thanks to kubectl is not enough ?
Taragolis commented on PR #37060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37060#issuecomment-1915055196
Ok, seems like last changes finally fix all places where old `moto`
decorators/context managers are uses.
Just need to rebase it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
raphaelauv closed pull request #36684: bump: kubernetes client version
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36684
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
dirrao commented on code in PR #37069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37069#discussion_r1469838242
##
airflow/providers/google/cloud/operators/dataflow.py:
##
@@ -677,6 +677,9 @@ def set_current_job(current_job):
options = self.dataflow_default_options
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c36c4db3f7 Kubernetes version bump (#37040)
potiuk merged PR #37040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37040
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #36678: apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes requires
latest kubernetes version
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36678
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
potiuk commented on PR #37040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37040#issuecomment-1915025497
Oh. Fantastic ! Thank you !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on PR #37060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37060#issuecomment-1915016353
:eyes:
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk commented on issue #36994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36994#issuecomment-1915013335
Cool
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
kajanajustin commented on PR #36991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36991#issuecomment-1915007044
@potiuk static checks and the test_can_be_disabled for the scheduler were
failing so I added a new class for the function. Let me know if you think
everything looks good so we can
chenyair commented on PR #36882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36882#issuecomment-1914986603
I see you added retires counter. What do you think about custom delay
between each retry of exceeded quota also? My issue is the high rate of
requests to Kubernetes API and currently
bolkedebruin commented on issue #37067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37067#issuecomment-1914980481
Hey @ap-- ,
That just sounds awesome! Obviously any simplification while retaining
flexibility sounds great.
The generic need for a custom class on top of
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37074#issuecomment-1914962812
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
Joffreybvn commented on PR #37025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37025#issuecomment-1914962675
Just need to fix the code formatting. A run of `breeze static-checks` will
do it :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
Joffreybvn commented on issue #36839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36839#issuecomment-1914955285
I could not reproduce your issue. But I found another bug where a single
namedtuple 'Row' fails to be serialized, while a list of those namedtuples
works fine. Is your query
bolkedebruin commented on PR #37058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37058#issuecomment-1914950829
> > If we chose 2 then it makes sense to move it into common.io (with all
the extras that it requires cause it is a 'new' capability for a provider).
>
> I think I''d
dirrao commented on PR #37040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37040#issuecomment-1914902451
@potiuk
I have fixed rest of the issues. Thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
Taragolis closed issue #37071: Airflow migrations depends on alembic>=1.13
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37071
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
tanelk opened a new issue, #37073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37073
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
When returning multiple outputs from
VladaZakharova opened a new pull request, #37072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37072
This PR adds the ability to install Kueue inside specific types of clusters
in GKE.
For more details please check:
cesar-vermeulen opened a new issue, #37071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37071
### Apache Airflow version
2.8.1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
Airflow failed to upgrade from version
shardbread opened a new pull request, #37069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37069
An error was encountered when calling the execute method on a
DataflowTemplateJobStartOperator instance with an unspecified location.
This fix resolves the issue with an empty location in the
robg-eb commented on PR #33718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33718#issuecomment-1914788890
@dstandish and team - Thank you for creating this PR, as we are currently
unable to properly use retries with Deferrable (Async) sensors, because of the
inconsistency in retry /
sunank200 commented on code in PR #36710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36710#discussion_r1469598323
##
airflow/timetables/datasets.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements.
ap-- opened a new issue, #37067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37067
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
I'm opening this issue to track a
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37067#issuecomment-1914666408
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
