rdhabalia merged PR #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.
rdhabalia commented on PR #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409#issuecomment-1778201624
> "Once NIC limit is zero, we should get rid of nic usage calculation."
Load-balancer already does that.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
mattisonchao commented on PR #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409#issuecomment-1776313411
@rdhabalia
>Think this way: there is no way to get specific information then should we
handle this scenario or should we just not allow that user to use that
software? it's
rdhabalia commented on PR #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409#issuecomment-1775661556
> We calculated facts for the load balancer by NIC limit and usage. If 0 NIC
limit and >0 tx and rx will mislead the load balancer?
Think this way: there is no way to get specifi
mattisonchao commented on PR #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409#issuecomment-1774220932
Question:
We calculated facts for the load balancer by NIC limit and usage. If 0 NIC
limit and >0 tx and rx will mislead the load balancer?
--
This is an automated message f
rdhabalia opened a new pull request, #21409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21409
### Motivation
This PR #14648 is incorrectly introduced, causing broker service
unavailability while upgrading brokers in heterogeneous hardware config
clusters. Sometime broker can’t find n
