[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7618) start-dfs.sh and stop-dfs.sh are not working properly

2011-09-09 Thread Devaraj K (JIRA)
start-dfs.sh and stop-dfs.sh are not working properly - Key: HADOOP-7618 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7618 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components:

JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Can someone with JIRA admin privileges see if the default sorting order for attachments be changed to be by date instead of by name? Ordering by date helps in picking up the latest patches easily. Thanks, +Vinod

RunJar classloader issues

2011-09-09 Thread Ferdy Galema
Sometimes when running hadoop jobs using the 'hadoop jar' command there are issues with the classloader. I presume these are caused by classes that are loaded BEFORE the commands main is invoced. For example, when relying on the MapWritable in the command, it is not possible to use a class that

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
+1. In addition, I've found easier for identifying the right patch to use a version suffix, like HADOOP-1234v2.patch. Maybe we should recommend something like that as a naming convention in the HowToContribute On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Uma Maheswara Rao G 72686
+1, that is nice point. Thanks, Uma - Original Message - From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Date: Friday, September 9, 2011 3:09 pm Subject: JIRA attachments order To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Can someone with JIRA admin privileges see if the default sorting > order for > attachments

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread John George
+1. Changing default to 'sorted by date' helps. John Vijoe George Edackattukudy On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:01 AM, "Uma Maheswara Rao G 72686" wrote: > > +1, that is nice point. > > Thanks, > Uma > - Original Message - > From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Date: Friday, September 9, 2011 3:09

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Ted Dunning
If you post the same patch with the same name, JIRA helps you out by greying all the earlier versions out. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:03 AM, John George wrote: > +1. Changing default to 'sorted by date' helps. > > John Vijoe George Edackattukudy > > On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:01 AM, "Uma Maheswara Rao G

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7619) Incorrect setting JAVA_HOME variable under Cygwin on windows

2011-09-09 Thread Serg Melikyan (JIRA)
Incorrect setting JAVA_HOME variable under Cygwin on windows Key: HADOOP-7619 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7619 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affe

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Doug Cutting
On 09/09/2011 07:27 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > If you post the same patch with the same name, JIRA helps you out by greying > all the earlier versions out. Indeed. That's the best practice, not to add version numbers to patch files, for this very reason. We should perhaps note this on: http://wik

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Wow, I didn't know that! Learn something new everyday, thanks guys. Cheers, Chris On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 09/09/2011 07:27 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> If you post the same patch with the same name, JIRA helps you out by greying >> all the earlier versions out. > > In

Research projects for hadoop

2011-09-09 Thread Saikat Kanjilal
Hi Folks,I was looking through the following wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopResearchProjects and was wondering if there's been any work done (or any interest to do work) for the following topics: Integration of Virtualization (such as Xen) with Hadoop toolsHow does one integr

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6553) Delegation tokens get NPE when the renewer is not set

2011-09-09 Thread Owen O'Malley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-6553. --- Resolution: Duplicate HADOOP-6620 fixed this. > Delegation tokens get NPE when the renewer

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Robert Evans
Can I ask, though that we do add branch information in the patches. Too often a patch is intended to apply to some branch other then trunk, and there is no easy way to tell what branch it was intended for. --Bobby Evans On 9/9/11 10:52 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote: Wow, I didn't kn

RE: Research projects for hadoop

2011-09-09 Thread Segel, Mike
Why would you want to take a perfectly good machine and then try to virtualize it? I mean if I have 4 quad core cpus, I can run a lot of simultaneous map tasks. However if I virtualize the box, I lose at least 1 core per VM so I end up with 4 nodes that have less capabilities and performance tha

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7620) All profiles should build the javadoc

2011-09-09 Thread Owen O'Malley (JIRA)
All profiles should build the javadoc - Key: HADOOP-7620 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7620 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Owen O'Malley Currentl

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Ravi Prakash
But what if I want to see an incremental diff between two patches? I don't want to review the whole patch everytime. Maybe I just want to re-review the changes made to a patch. I would then have sort the patches manually using time. I think its better to have version numbers in that case On Fri,

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Eli Collins
How about we the how to contribute page with a simple standard? jira-xyz.patch # for trunk jira-xyz-branch.patch # for a release branch, could use a shortened name, eg "20x" for branch-20-security and "append" for branch-20-append. Thanks, Eli On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Robert Evans wro

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Eli Collins
Personally I like version numbers as well, it allows me to refer to a specific version of the patch (vs a patch on a given time of date/date). I also notice some people use .txt which browsers can view in place vs .patch which will download by default unless you register a viewer. Thanks, Eli O

RE: Research projects for hadoop

2011-09-09 Thread Saikat Kanjilal
Thanks all for your feedback on this, I'll research some more and gather some benchmarks, also what about the provisioning of long running services via HOD, is anyone looking at this project or has done work on this? Regards > From: mse...@navteq.com > To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduc

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Harsh J
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Ravi Prakash wrote: > But what if I want to see an incremental diff between two patches? I don't > want to review the whole patch everytime. Maybe I just want to re-review the > changes made to a patch. I would then have sort the patches manually using > time. I th

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
Agreed. Furthermore, if I have 10+ versions of a patch, when getting feedback knowing for with version would be handy, having a single name makes this correlation difficult. Thxs. Alejandro [PS: I know, I should code better not have to go thru several versions] On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:08 AM,

Re: Research projects for hadoop

2011-09-09 Thread Andrew Purtell
Both Hadoop and virtualization are means to an end. That end is to consolidate workloads traditionally deployed to separate servers so the average utilization and ROI of a given server increases. Companies looking to consolidate data-intensive computation may be better served moving to Hadoop i

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Doug Cutting
On 09/09/2011 11:12 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > Personally I like version numbers as well, it allows me to refer to a > specific version of the patch (vs a patch on a given time of > date/date). Re-using the name doesn't hide the old versions, it just makes them gray. They're still listed, with dat

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Eli Collins
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 09/09/2011 11:12 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Personally I like version numbers as well,  it allows me to refer to a >> specific version of the patch (vs a patch on a given time of >> date/date). > > Re-using the name doesn't hide the old vers

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > Patches for trunk should be named: jira-xyz.patch > eg hdfs-123.patch s,patch,txt, since jira doesn't appear to pass a content-type to indicate it is readable by the browser (as you mentioned earlier).

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Doug Cutting
On 09/09/2011 01:08 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > s,patch,txt, since jira doesn't appear to pass a content-type to indicate it > is readable by the browser (as you mentioned earlier). I think Jira uses the content-type that the browser posts with. My browser (Chrome on Ubuntu) posts .patch files

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Aaron T. Myers
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Patches for a specific branch should be named: jira-xyz-branch.patch > where "branch" may be abbreviated, eg hdfs-123-security.patch > +1, if we ever hope to implement HADOOP-7435 [1], it will be necessary to standardize the branch-name-in-p

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Kirby Bohling
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Patches for a specific branch should be named:  jira-xyz-branch.patch >> where "branch" may be abbreviated, eg hdfs-123-security.patch >> > > +1, if we ever hope to implement HADOOP-74

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Doug Cutting
On 09/09/2011 01:38 PM, Kirby Bohling wrote: > Someday I wish Apache would find/adopt a distributed version control > system (I know about git.apache.org, but I mean pushing that further), > and use something like gerrit or review board. So if you have a > patch, or a series of patches, you'd just

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Kirby Bohling
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 09/09/2011 01:38 PM, Kirby Bohling wrote: >> Someday I wish Apache would find/adopt a distributed version control >> system (I know about git.apache.org, but I mean pushing that further), >> and use something like gerrit or review board.  So

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Doug Cutting
On 09/09/2011 02:15 PM, Kirby Bohling wrote: > Fair enough Doug. Somebody else will have to do that, I don't have > commit access (a pre-requisite for access to the private lists). I'd > make the suggestion there, but I literally can't. Such suggestions have been made before. What's lacking are

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Ted Dunning
Review board already works. Hbase uses it extensively. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Kirby Bohling wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > On 09/09/2011 01:38 PM, Kirby Bohling wrote: > >> Someday I wish Apache would find/adopt a distributed version control > >> syste

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Eli Collins
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Patches for a specific branch should be named:  jira-xyz-branch.patch >> where "branch" may be abbreviated, eg hdfs-123-security.patch >> > > +1, if we ever hope to implement HADOOP-74

Re: JIRA attachments order

2011-09-09 Thread Eli Collins
I updated HowToContribute, it people like this prose I'll advertise the change to *-dev. Thanks, Eli On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >>> Patches for a specific b

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml

2011-09-09 Thread Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers reopened HADOOP-5983: I can confirm that this issue still exists on branch-0.20-security. Reopening it so it can be

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7621) alfredo config should be in a file not readable by users

2011-09-09 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)
alfredo config should be in a file not readable by users Key: HADOOP-7621 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7621 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Compon

Re: Understanding execution flow of Hadoop code

2011-09-09 Thread ArunKumar
Hi ! I am interested in working of Jobtracker, Taskracker and Namenode stuff. My interest is in Scheduler working. As harsh mentioned for mapreduce , i have run a wordcount program and saw the flow of control from job submission, execution and completion. How do i go about it ? Thanks, Arun --